Power generation reward scheme
From April, households and communities that install generating technologies such as small wind turbines and solar panels will be entitled to claim payments for the electricity they produce.
Energy and climate change secretary Ed Miliband today announced details of the feed-in tariff (FITs) for small-scale low-carbon electricity. It is estimated a typical 2.5kW well-sited solar photovoltaic (pv) installation could offer a homeowner a reward of up to £900 and save them £140 a year on their electricity bill.
From 1 April, those who install low-carbon electricity technology such as solar pv panels and wind turbines up to 5MW will be paid for the electricity they generate, even if they use it themselves.
Ofgem will administer the feed-in tariff scheme and suppliers will be responsible for paying the reward to their customers.
The level of payment depends on the technology and is linked to inflation. They will get a further payment for any electricity they feed into the grid. The scheme will also apply to installations commissioned since July 2008 when the policy was announced.
The energy secretary also revealed a blueprint for a similar scheme to incentivise low-carbon heating technologies in April 2011. It is believed this renewable heat incentive (RHI) will be a world first.
The incentive guarantees payments for those who install technologies such as ground-source heat pumps, biomass boilers and air-source heat pumps. Under the proposed tariffs the installation of a ground-source heat pump, which is one that uses the earth as a heat sink to store heat or as a source of heat, in an average semi-detached house with adequate insulation could be rewarded with £1,000 a year and lead to savings of £200 per year if used instead of heating oil.
Commenting on the FIT announcement today, Steve Mahon, chief investment officer at Low Carbon Investors, the investment manager for AIM-listed Low Carbon Accelerator, said: ‘We’ve long been in favour of feed-in tariffs as the best policy mechanism to stimulate the small-scale market.
‘Today’s announcement should help encourage the levels of finance required to make this a viable form of generation in the UK. It is encouraging to see that policy-makers have been long-sighted enough to make this an index linked payment so that real term returns will not drop as wider economic conditions change.’
‘I am concerned that the headline figures being quoted for financial returns could encourage people to make unwise investments,’ cautioned Doug King, Royal Academy of Engineering Visiting Professor in Building Engineering Physics at Bath University. ‘Unlike the previous capital grants scheme, feed-in tariffs will pay according to the amount of renewable electricity generated and studies have shown that small-scale renewable systems often generate far less in practice than originally anticipated.
‘A 2009 study of small-scale domestic wind turbines by the Energy Savings Trust found no urban or suburban installation that generated more than 200 units of electricity per year. Under the new feed-in tariff this level of generation would pay a homeowner just £69 per year on top of the electricity bill savings of £26.
‘I would encourage anyone planning to invest in renewable energy as a result of this announcement to have a proper appraisal of their generation potential. There is no question that a well-designed renewable energy system in the right location is a benefit.’
Most popular
-
Is 3D cinema all it's cracked up to be?
-
EADS aircraft runs on algae biofuel
-
Brunel student creates missing link for cyclists
-
Forgemasters saga raises concerns over coalition business policy
-
Conservative donor 'tried to invest in Forgemasters'
-
Stealth overcoat hides military equipment
-
The Hayward Legacy
-
Cornell robot breaks walking distance record
-
Turbine to produce electricity from river or tidal streams
-
Qinetiq solar-powered aircraft set to break endurance record
Most commented
-
Is 3D cinema all it's cracked up to be?
-
The Hayward Legacy
-
Forgemasters saga raises concerns over coalition business policy
-
EADS aircraft runs on algae biofuel
-
Brunel student creates missing link for cyclists
-
Oil over troubled waters
-
Engineers must grab their share of the limelight
-
Ceramic plate speeds blood cleaning
-
Conservative donor 'tried to invest in Forgemasters'
-
Where's my jetpack?
Most emailed
-
EADS aircraft runs on algae biofuel
-
Projects aim to make the most of captured CO2
-
Qinetiq solar-powered aircraft set to break endurance record
-
Cornell robot breaks walking distance record
-
Contracts and Projects Tracker: Who's doing business and where
-
Brunel student creates missing link for cyclists
-
Turbine to produce electricity from river or tidal streams
-
Stealth overcoat hides military equipment
-
Willetts casts doubts over nanotechnology centres
-
Scientists develop nasal-based communication device






Readers' comments (5)
CG | 3 Feb 2010 10:35 am
I see that the wind turbine size goes up to 5 mega watts in this feed in tariff. I wonder if this will give a boost to cooperatives, such as Windbay. Cooperatives are the way to go, if you want to invest in a wind turbine - size is almost everything, when it comes to returns on capital outlay. Not enough is known about wind co-ops, I had to Google to find Windbay.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Andrew Lord | 3 Feb 2010 1:47 pm
Thermal solar panels are not mentioned in this report. Thermal solar panels heat water which can be used to provide some of the domestic hot water in the summer and are a good renewable solution for some properties.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Ebrahim | 3 Feb 2010 4:28 pm
I have been inside a 3 MW wind power and 5 MW is much bigger. It is massive. I reckon the report meant 5 KW rather than 5 MW.
5 MW not yet produced in industrial scale let alone put it in your backyard.
Many thanks
Dr E Mirshamsi
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
peter field | 4 Feb 2010 7:30 pm
The full list of FITs is on the internet and there are ranges of tariffs for different sizes of installation; for wind, up to 5MW.
Size is everything.... unfortunately the tariffs reflect this and the rate for 1.5 to 5MW is only 4.5p compared with 34.5 for typical small domestic! The reason for this, as Professor King states, is that domestic renewables have a hideously low load factor as numerous detailed reports have proved. For wind, large land installations can be over 25% but for most domestic, load factors are between zero and 10%. The main risk of FITs, apart from defacing our towns and gardens, is an enormous drain on our economy as gullable home owners use up their savings on the high installation costs. Money also is forced out of the main electricity suppliers (forced to pay the FITs) who badly need it to replace conventional power stations. At last, OFGEM is starting to get alarmed at the total lack of any centralised control over energy.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
CG | 6 Feb 2010 10:27 am
If what Peter Field says is true, then this government is giving the highest subsidy to the least productive size of wind turbines - why am I not surprised?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment