Friday - 05 September 2008

Letters

Reactor danger

Published: 16 June 2008  09:00 AM
Source: The Engineer

We must safeguard against nuclear bombs or aircraft strikes on nuclear reactors — a possibility that must be accounted for over the 50-year life of a reactor.

An article in the Scientific American magazine — possibly July 1979 — said the effects of a nuclear bomb being dropped on a reactor would mean most of the radioactive material within the reactor being dispersed.

Lethal doses of radiation poisoning for 50 per cent of the population would be for hundreds of miles downwind. An aircraft strike may be less severe, but still terrible.

Nuclear reactors should be built in nuclear-proof bunkers — preferably on sites suitable for waste disposal, so it can be disposed of on site. We already have an underground power station, Dinorwig, so the cost and technology should not be that prohibitive. And anyway it could go into the terrorism counter-measures budget.

The risk of attack is hopefully small, but the consequence of an incident is so dreadful that it must be avoided.

Other risks, such as tidal waves and earthquakes, while rare in the UK, should also be considered.

Duncan Irvine, Aylesbury



Thank you for your comments. It is our understanding that current nuclear reactor designs do take into account aircraft strikes — Editor





Latest Jobs
Job TitleJob LocationJob Position
Process Operations Manager ...United KingdomPermanent
Process Operations Manager ...North WestPermanent
Test Electrician...Glasgow AreaPermanent
Project Managers...LancashirePermanent
Senior Project Manager...KentPermanent
Project Leader / Senior Project Leader...HampshirePermanent

User Account Logon Form

Quick Search Form

Advanced Search

Adverts

The Magazine
Subscribe
This Issue >
Digital Edition >
Free Copy >
Break Line

Engineering Talk

Search the world's number 1 design news source... updated daily

Break Line




Break Line
Recruiter of the Week Fluor LtdBreak Line
Break Line