Tuesday, 30 September 2014
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Grounded Dreamliners could resume flights within weeks

Commercial flights of Boeing’s grounded 787 Dreamliners could resume within weeks following changes to the design of the aircraft’s lithium-ion batteries the company has claimed.

The entire fleet of fifty 787s was grounded by regulators in January following a battery fire on a aircraft parked in the US, and a smoking battery on an aircraft flying over Japan.

Boeing’s plan to address these battery problems - which has been approved by the FAA - includes enhanced testing and monitoring during the manufacturing process, changes to the design of the battery itself, and the development of a new battery enclosure, designed to further reduce the risk of fire.

‘We’ve come up with a comprehensive set of solutions that result in a safer battery system,’ said Mike Sinnett, vice president and chief project engineer, 787 program, Boeing Commercial Airplanes.

Boeing 787 Battery

Boeing 787 Battery

To optimise the manufacturing process, Boeing worked with Thales, the provider of the integrated power conversion system, and battery maker GS Yuasa to develop rigorous new testing and monitoring procedures designed to reduce the possibility for variation in the production of the batteries. 

According to Boeing, each cell will go through more rigorous testing in the month following its manufacture including a 14-day test during which readings of discharge rates are being taken every hour.

The three companies have also decided to narrow the acceptable level of charge for the battery, both by lowering the highest charge allowed and raising the lower level allowed for discharge.

Two pieces of equipment in the battery system – the battery monitoring unit and the charger are being redesigned to the narrower definition. The battery charger will also be adapted to soften the charging cycle to put less stress on the battery during charging.

The engineering team is also looking at improving the insulation around the individual cells within the battery, and believes that the use of electrical and thermal insulation installed above, below and between the cells will help keep the heat of the cells from impacting each other.

The team has also made changes to the battery case that contains the battery cells and the battery management unit. Small holes at the bottom will allow moisture to drain away from the battery and larger holes on the sides will allow a failed battery to vent with less impact to other parts of the battery.

The battery case will sit in a new enclosure made of stainless steel. This enclosure will isolate the battery from the rest of the equipment in the electronic equipment bays. It also will ensure there can be no fire inside the enclosure, thus adding another layer of protection to the battery system. The enclosure features a direct vent to carry battery vapors outside the airplane.

A view of the new enclosure that will surround the Dreamliner's redesigned batteries

A view of the new enclosure that will surround the Dreamliner’s redesigned batteries

According to Sinnett, the design of the new enclosure entirely eliminates oxygen, making the containment unit self-inerting. Inerting is a step above fire detection and extinguishing as it prevents a fire from ever occurring. ‘We tried to find a way to introduce a fire in the containment but it just wouldn’t happen,’ he said.  ‘Even when we introduced a flammable gas in the presence of an ignition source, the absence of oxygen meant there was no fire.’


Readers' comments (3)

  • I'm rather reminded of the Apollo re-design after the fatal launchpad fire (although thankfully this is less extreme) where you cannot help but think "why didn't they design it like this from the start?"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lithium Cobalt chemistry was the (not very well understood) fashion when Boeing specified it in a large cell configuration in 2007. Since then most manufacturers of heavy duty batteries have moved on to Lithium Iron Phosphate, Lithium Nickel Oxide, etc. fabricated in small cells and multiplexed. Boeing has the wrong (least stable) chemistry in the wrong format. A massively over-engineered vented container system is now required to protect the aircraft. This is lousy engineering.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ‘Even when we introduced a flammable gas in the presence of an ignition source, the absence of oxygen meant there was no fire.’

    Sounds like the testing was more aggressive this time?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article