Advanced search

New technique paves the way for 3D-printed aircraft wings

Aircraft wings built with 3D printers could be a step closer thanks to a technique developed by BAE Systems.


Source: BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre

BAE Systems has developed a technique for reducing distortion in metallic 3D printed parts by relieving internal stresses.

The company has developed a process to prevent large metallic structures made using additive manufacturing from distorting or building up internal stress during printing, potentially paving the way for making components strong enough to use in aircraft.

The technique involves an established way of making metal parts stronger by rapidly and repeatedly striking them using an ultrasonic tool – a form of peening – applied as each layer of the component is laid down by the 3D printer in order to relieve stresses and improve the material’s microstructure.

Civil aircraft manufacturers including Boeing and Airbus are already using 3D printing to produce small components such as hinges as a way of reducing waste of expensive materials such as titanium.

Scaling up the process to large and complex metallic parts could also the enable the creation of more complex shapes – for example hollow and therefore lighter wings – and make production of a small number of these components more cost effective.

But increasing the size of 3D printed parts raises the chance that the internal stresses that build up as the material cools will lead to problems, said Andy Wescott, a senior research scientist at BAE’s Advanced Technology Centre.

‘As the material contracts it creates residual stress that is locked into the part,’ he told The Engineer. ‘This can manifest as distortion but also affects the mechanical performance.’

With BAE’s technique, a layer of material is laid down, melted into shape using a laser and left to cool before being cold worked using the ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT). The next layer is then deposited, heated and the process starts again.

‘It’s not just the cold working step that produces the positive result,’ said Jagjit Sidu, the ATC’s technical leader for additive manufacturing. ‘It’s the combination of the cold working with the heat treatment. It all becomes part of the deposition process.’


Source: BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre

A comparison of the microstructure of 3D-printed parts made with and without the treatment.

UIT is typically used to treat welded areas in metallic structures in the rail and oil and gas industries to increase their fatigue life.

An ultrasonic transducer causes the tool head to vibrate at a very controllable rate and impart powerful compression forces while only placing a small load on the tool itself, allowing it to be handheld – or in this case fitted to a robot, meaning it could be easily integrated with additive manufacturing systems.

The BAE team, which also included group leader for materials engineering Stephen Morgan, developed a feedback system that uses load cells in the base plate, onto which the structure is printed, to measure the strains as they form and adjust the UIT to correct them in real time.

Asked how much time the treatment added to the 3D printing process, Westcott declined to give a specific figure but said: ‘It is a quick manual or automated process. From the measurements obtained from our strain measuring system, the surface quickly becomes saturated and no further amount of treatment has any effect.

‘Obviously, if you treat every layer it is a longer process than if you treat every five layers, but optimising the process will be the subject of further work.’

The company has demonstrated the technique by producing 3D printed structures up to 1m in length and has applied for patents on the UIT process and the feedback system.

Now the researchers plan to further optimise the process and build a better understanding of where to apply the UIT in larger and more complex parts, in order to be able to move towards prototype components.

Readers' comments (4)

  • I am pleased to learn that the time-honoured technigue of hitting unsatisfactory aircraft parts has been revived. The earliest documented instance of the method that I can find was the use of a sledge hammer at Castle Bromwich for adjusting Spitfire wing attachment points. I am sure there are plenty of other applications to be found. Great stuff. Keep on re-inventing the wheel & who knows where we will end up!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A good approach in additive manufacturing technique. Optimizing the process for controlling the stress due to hand held tool and mainly controlling the strain from measurements in situ may be a cumbersome effort. Good luck.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I helped etch these :) -->much fun. Andy did all the polishing leg work. So pleased we got this out into the public domain.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Isn't it amazing to know that simple load cells can actually measure such a big thing like this aircraft? The transformation in our technology is definitely reliable and convenient for any kind of heavy-duty measurements.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say


My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article