Advanced search

Researchers seek to improve design of hypersonic engines

Stanford University researchers are hoping to improve the design of hypersonic aircraft engines by running simulations on thousands of computers at once.

The $20m (£12.5m) Stanford Predictive Science Academic Alliance Program (PSAAP) funded by the US Department of Energy aims to model how fuel and air flow through a scramjet engine so that engineers can make their designs safer and more reliable.

‘Some of our latest calculations run on 163,000 processors simultaneously,’ said the programme’s faculty director Prof Parviz Moin in a statement. ‘I think they’re some of the largest calculations ever undertaken.’

A scramjet engine enables aircraft to fly at many times the speed of sound by burning fuel in an airflow that is already moving at supersonic speed.

However, the extreme mechanical forces acting on these engines make them very vulnerable to failure if conditions are not exactly right.

Last year, a test flight of the hypersonic Boeing X-51 Waverider ended prematurely after a problem known as an unstart occurred. It’s this issue that the Stanford researchers hope to address.

‘If you put too much fuel in the engine when you try to start it, you get a phenomenon called “thermal choking”, where shock waves propagate back through the engine,’ said Moin.

‘Essentially, the engine doesn’t get enough oxygen and it dies. It’s like trying to light a match in a hurricane.’

PSAAP’s aim is work out exactly what the uncertainties are in modelling a scramjet engine so that engineers can build enough tolerance into their designs to allow the technology to function in different circumstances.

‘When you base decisions on computations that are in some way imperfect, you make errors,’ said Juan Alonso, associate professor of aeronautics and astronautics.

‘Not only that, but these hypersonic vehicles are themselves subject to uncertainties in how they behave in the air.’

Understanding these uncertainties could also help improve other complex simulations, he added.

‘These same technologies can be used to quantify flow of air around wind farms, for example, or for complex global climate models.’

Readers' comments (3)

  • Very interesting, and very clever.

    Does it add that much to what we already know. And can it really help in aerodynamic development?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NATO RTO's department has already done a lot of work about this. The research is not really new

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • sounds like an expensive way to say the solution is to slow the air down and cool it in a pre cooler to make it more dense before running it into a turbine engine, like the 1980's satan hypersonic engine(classified UK official secrets act) and the sabre engine(same as satan pretty much only design changes to avoid official secrets act from 20 years ago) so I ask you what's an aurora if it's not a hypersonic hydrogen snorting monster built in the 80's when the UK shared classified engine tech with the USA?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say


My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article