Thursday, 31 July 2014
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Authorities pinpoint cause of 787 battery fire

The US National Transportation Safety Board has identified the origin of a battery fire that occurred on a Japan Airlines (JAL) 787 at Boston Logan Airport in January.

The aircraft was on the ground in Boston on January 7, 2013 when the auxiliary power unit battery (APU) of a JAL 787 experienced severe fire damage.

This and other incidents led the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to issue an emergency airworthiness directive that required airlines to temporarily cease flights of the 787 whilst battery failures were investigated.

‘US airlines carry about two million people through the skies safely every day, which has been achieved in large part through design redundancy and layers of defence,’ said NTSB chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman. ‘Our task now is to see if enough - and appropriate - layers of defense and adequate checks were built into the design, certification and manufacturing of this battery.’

After an examination of the JAL lithium-ion battery, which was comprised of eight individual cells, investigators determined that the majority of evidence from the flight data recorder and both thermal and mechanical damage pointed to an initiating event in a single cell.

According to NTSB, that cell showed multiple signs of short circuiting, leading to a thermal runaway condition, which then cascaded to other cells. Charred battery components indicated that the temperature inside the battery case exceeded 500 degrees Fahrenheit.

As investigators work to find the cause of the initiating short circuit, they ruled out mechanical impact damage to the battery and external short circuiting. It was determined that signs of deformation and electrical arcing on the battery case occurred as a result of the battery malfunction and were not related to its cause.

Hersman said in a statement that potential causes of the initiating short circuit currently being evaluated include battery charging, the design and construction of the battery, and the possibility of defects introduced during the manufacturing process.

During the 787 certification process, Boeing studied possible failures that could occur within the battery. Those assessments included the likelihood of particular types of failures occurring, as well as the effects they could have on the battery. In tests to validate these assessments, Boeing found no evidence of cell-to-cell propagation or fire, both of which occurred in the JAL event.

In a related development the FAA has announced that it has granted Boeing permission to conduct test flights of 787 aircraft to collect data about the battery and electrical system performance while the aircraft is airborne.


Readers' comments (1)

  • I wonder if they use a balance charger on the battey?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Digital Edition

The Engineer July Digi Issue

Poll

London Mayor Boris Johnson is lobbying for a £10 additional charge for diesel cars to drive into Central London by 2020, and for road tax on diesel cars and all pre-2006 cars to be increased, to counter air pollution. What option most closely matches your opinion on this?

Previous Poll

Europe's largest tidal array in the Pentand Firth off Orkney will eventually generate up to 86MW of power. What will it take for tidal energy to make an appreciable contribution to the UK's energy needs?

Read and comment on the results here