Thursday, 30 October 2014
Advanced search

Hydrogen breakthrough paves way for ammonia-fuelled cars

British scientists have proposed a way of making it easier and cheaper to run hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles by filling them with ammonia. 

The researchers have developed a way to cut the costs of making hydrogen from ammonia, which can be transported and stored much more easily than hydrogen in tanks similar to those already used by filling stations for liquid petroleum gas (LPG).

This method of cracking ammonia using relatively cheap sodium rather than an expensive catalyst could pave the way for fuel-cell vehicles to make their own hydrogen from a widely available chemical, rather than carrying a tank of very high-pressure hydrogen and requiring expensive new infrastructure.

Alternatively, combining a small amount of hydrogen with the rest of the ammonia would enable it to be burned in an optimised but conventional internal combustion engine (ICE), the researchers from the ISIS Neutron Source facility in Oxfordshire claim.

Several major car manufacturers are planning to launch commercial hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles in the next few years, including Toyota, Honda and General Motors. But there are major fears about the difficulty of creating a hydrogen fuel infrastructure – as well as the perceived dangers of the potentially explosive gas.

/r/k/e/14EC2754_Ammonia_storage_research.jpg

Source: STFC

Principle investigators Dr Martin Owen Jones (left) and Prof Bill David with their ammonia decomposition reactor.

Prof Bill David, whose research team at ISIS has built a 20cm3 proof-of-concept reactor, said ammonia could be stored at much lower pressures than the 700 atmospheres typically used to store hydrogen for use in vehicles.

‘We would store the ammonia at 20 atmospheres so it would be straightforward to store it on forecourts,’ he told The Engineer. ‘If you’ve got the equivalent of LPG tanks on your forecourts you don’t need to worry about expensive hydrogen infrastructure.’

He added that an ammonia-fuelled ICE could be almost as efficient as some current engine designs. ‘The ammonia’s performance is not as good as petrol or diesel but it’s in the same ballpark. I reckon we can easily get 40 miles to the gallon with a tank of ammonia, so it has a range way beyond what you’re going to get with an electric car.’

Old idea, new solution

Current methods of producing hydrogen from ammonia rely on precious metal catalysts such as ruthenium at very high temperatures. The ISIS solution – which was actually first recorded by British chemist Arthur Titherley in 1894 – is to react the ammonia with sodium to produce sodium amide, which then breaks down into nitrogen, hydrogen and the original sodium.

Although the reaction still requires temperatures of 400°C, this is lower than those needed for a catalyst-based reaction. A constant flow of ammonia would mean only a small amount would need to be heated at any one time, making it possible for a conventionally sized car battery to start the process.

Ammonia is one of the world’s most widely produced inorganic chemicals. Conventionally it is manufactured from hydrocarbons but using biogas or hydrogen made using renewable energy would offer a low-carbon alternative.

David admitted that converting hydrogen into ammonia and then back again created inefficiencies but said it was a better way of storing the fuel than using large amounts of energy to compress it. ‘If you want to make hydrogen compact then ammonia is probably the best way,’ he said.

The first ammonia-burning vehicle was a bus created in Belgium in 1943, and several other ammonia-fuelled cars have been built in recent years, notably the adapted Toyota GT-86 sports car produced by Italian tyre firm Marangoni.

But David said the advantage of turning some of the ammonia into hydrogen was that it made it easier to combust the fuel and reduced the need for expensive catalysts.

Prof Robert Steinberger-Wilckens, chair in hydrogen and fuel cell research at the University of Birmingham, said using sodium and ammonia in place of hydrogen would increase the weight of the fuel by a factor of at least four, but that the overall weight may still be less than that of a high-pressure hydrogen tank.

‘I believe this solution could work well for small, portable applications,’ he told The Engineer via email. ‘I doubt the extra energy required for first producing ammonia and the cracking it at high temperatures will be justified for any applications requiring larger flows of hydrogen.’

The ISIS Neutron Source, which is operated by the Science and Technology Facilities Council, enabled the researchers to prove the exact nature of chemical reactions taking place as the ammonia reacted with the sodium to produce hydrogen. Their research is published today in The Journal of the American Chemical Society.


Readers' comments (10)

  • The problem with using hydrogen for automotive purposes is that the losses in the total energy cycle are too high. Due to that it will never be able to compete with other energy carriers and may even batteries be preferable in the long run. Adding another inefficient stage to it what is proposed does not help.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gerard McEk - that's true, but the point is this allows you to store energy at a density that's very similar to that available in petrol and much higher than will ever be possible with batteries. Of course it can't compare with carbon fuels, but that not the point. Its not a replacement but a successor for when carbon fuels are too polluting/too expensive/too scarce / too politically unpalitble / too insecure

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ammonia is extremely corrosive and toxic. How are you going to handle it safely? A punctured fuel tank is incredibly dangerous. No thanks. I'll take hydrogen any day over ammonia. One of the reasons that ammonia was replaced by freon in refrigeration for domestic use was safety.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • James Jones - Ammonia is toxic and corrosive, but 100 million tonnes of it are made every year and used all over the world, as anhydrous ammonia, in farms with very few accidents. In addition there are ways to make ammonia tanks very safe using incredibly cheap materials. Hydrogen is explosive between 4 and 96% concentration and tanks are meant to be at 700 atmospheres. While ammonia is toxic and corrosive, its toxic at the 1000ppm level and the nose detects it at the 1-2ppm level. Its so much easier to handle ammonia than hydrogen as you can clearly see from the safety literature associated with the two gasses. However, its a matter of choice. High pressure and highly explosive for a hydrogen tank that will take you 500km vs. a smaller, less wasteful tank that contains a toxic and corrosive gas. It seems to me that the infrastructure costs, in the region of $trillions, for a distributed hydrogen network weigh very heavily against it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • IF we use hydrogen as a gas with out pressure it would be cheap to make and safer. It has been done and will cost pennies to do it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • With EURO6 requirements many diesel cars will require either ammonia or urea injection for SCR units for NOx compliance. Also ammonia plants are almost identical to conventional SMR hydrogen plants, with an air injection after the reformer furnace. Ammonia may have major risks - but it's already on it's way to a petrol station near your home...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 1: Exactly how would your average motorist deal with a Sodium Fire ? It's not your average problem.

    2: Have you ever experienced the effects of breathing a significant release of ammonia. I have.

    NH3 in forecourt tanks at 300psi - No Thanks !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Safe ammonia storage: http://www.amminex.net/technology/the-solid.aspx

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Usig a liquid store such as suggested is an excellent idea for utilising the existing infrastructure and certainly preferable to pure Hydrogen storage. What became of the idea along a similar vein as this using Methanol and reforming at elevated temp on board the cell. I think Ballard proposed this some time ago.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The first ammonia powered vehicles were streetcars that ran in New Orleans in the early 1900s.

    The French engineer Charles Tellier was a pioneer in the field of solar energy. In 1885, he installed a roof-top solar collector very similar to the flat-plate collectors used today for heating domestic water. His collector system was composed of ten units made of two iron sheets riveted together and connected by piping to form a single array. The collector plates were filled with ammonia, and after exposure to sunlight, sufficient pressure was created in the ammonia gas to power a water pump that Tellier had placed in his well, at the rate of some 300 gallons per hour during daylight.

    The first ammonia fuelled vehicles were developed in Italy and Norway in 1933, more than a decade before the buses in Belgium were converted. Hydrofuel Inc. and a sister company converted a 1981 Chev Impala and drove it across Canada in 1981 and in 2007 converted a Dodge Ram diesel truck to use ammonia and diesel fuel. http://www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/POWER/ammonia/ammonia.htm AND http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vwmzkn0paM AND www.NH3fuel.com

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article