Advanced search

Siemens and BMV unveil wireless EV charging station

Siemens and BMW have entered the wireless electric vehicle charging market with their version of inductive technology.

The two firms launched their non-contact charging station at manufacturing fair Hannover Messe last week in advance of a government-funded trial scheme in Berlin planned for June this year.

Inductive charging allows motorists to recharge their electric vehicles’ batteries just by parking their car over the wireless station, making the process quicker and simple, and reducing the changes of wear and tear or damage from vandalism.

Halo IPT, a spin-out from Auckland University, became the first company to launch commercial wireless vehicle technology in November 2011 following more than a decade of trials.

Siemens now intends to test its own 3.6kW charging technology in an electric vehicle to determine what improvements would be needed to integrate the system into series-produced vehicles under real-life conditions.

‘A big obstacle to the expansion of electric mobility is the lack of an extensive and reliable charging infrastructure,’ Siemens said in a statement.

‘Because electric cars have to recharge their batteries more often than vehicles with combustion engines need to refuel, various charging techniques are required that are adapted to the needs of the drivers and vehicles.

‘Siemens’ inductive energy transmission concept would make it possible to automatically recharge vehicles such as taxis waiting at cab stands.’

It added: ‘The associated charging stations can be easily incorporated into practically any setting, making them nearly invisible and effectively protecting them against vandalism and wear and tear.’

The charging stations are connected to the public grid by an underground primary coil. A secondary coil is attached to the car and when the driver starts the charging process, an electric current begins to flow through the primary coil.

The resulting magnetic field induces an electric current in the secondary coil, which recharges the battery. Electricity is transmitted from the grid through all of the components to the battery at an efficiency of more than 90 per cent.

The magnetic field is generated only in an exactly predetermined area between the two coils, which are typically between 8cm and 15cm apart.

The system therefore generates a magnetic field whose strength in and around the vehicle is far below the internationally recommended limit of 6.25 microteslas. 

The system could also enable the car to serve as a storage unit where most of the energy it uses is surplus electricity from solar- and wind-power facilities.

Readers' comments (7)

  • As a radio enthusiast I wonder what frequency these 3.6Kw transmitters will be using and how much interference they will cause to other radio users, The potential for RFI disruption will be considerable.

    Plugging in a cable will be bad enough with high power switching converters in large scale use, there are bound to be problems with poorly designed or faulty units generating RFI.

    Enter the Interference Police, stage left!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "The magnetic field is generated only in an exactly predetermined area between the two coils, which are typically between 8cm and 15cm apart"

    So what happens if you park 6" to the left? I doubt most people could position a car more accurately than that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • These systems typically operate in the kHz range on an assigned frequency. They are filtered to ensure that any spurious emissions comply with international RF emissions limits the same as any other electrical product. There will no interference or they would be called to book very quickly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Apart from RF interference questions I assume the distance mentioned is the vertical gap between the coil in the ground and the other in the car, which in imperial terms gives a clearance of between c.4 and 6 inches. Just the right height for road humps etc to rip the system to shreds.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Like Simon, I am a radio Ham so share his concerns. I think JohnG is being very naive if he honestly thinks that there will be no interferance to other systems.
    Previous 'segregated' sytems have proven this not to be the case. Power Line Data Transmission being one example.
    I did the same mental arithamatic to JohnK and concluded that some form of retracting mechanism would be required to tuck the coil out of harms way during driving.
    Let us not be too sceptical, we need to investigate any avenue to make alternative energy transport viable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is undestood that, the charging process has to be initiated by the vehicle driver, then of course an extending/ retracting mechanism for vehicle borne coil might have been thought of, already.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Kevin & Nizar. Yes, agree some form of retracting mechanism would clearly seem needed.... adding weight, as coils would then need a seperate supporting frame and raising/lowering mechanism and latching device. This would also have a significant failure potential. Dropping the coil assembly toward the road at 70mph.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say


My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article