Wednesday, 03 September 2014
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Blaming costly wind farms or greedy energy firms won't solve our energy problems

Deciphering energy bills is a nightmare process. The complexity of variable, multi-tiered tariffs, discounts, taxes, levies and distribution costs make it very difficult to work out how much utility firms actually charge us for energy. It’s probably one of the reasons why more people don’t take advantage of the ability to switch to a cheap provider.

It gets even more difficult to understand where all the money comes from and goes to as you move up the business chain to a world of wholesale prices, subsidies, government budgets and feed-in-tariffs.

This is the problem with the energy market: nothing is simple. There are no easy answers to the issue of rising bills that don’t involve ripping up the countryside, dumping radioactive waste and provoking runaway climate change.

Even the supposed energy panacea of the moment, fracking, offers very little in the way of a secure solution because the UK is a small island operating within a European gas market and so is unlikely to see the transformation of the energy (and natural) landscape the US has experienced in recent years.

This week we’ve heard how the big energy firms are being “forced” to raise their prices, because rising wholesale costs and the government levy on bills used to invest in energy efficiency, renewable generation and to support vulnerable consumers. To be fair to SSE, which is putting prices up by 8.2 per cent, the company is making a loss at the moment. But then that hasn’t stopped it from increasing the dividend paid to its shareholders.

However, the situation is far more complex than can be summed up just by calling energy firms greedy or complaining about government subsidies for wind farms. The government says supporting renewable energy will keep energy costs lower than they would otherwise be in the long run, and they may be right.

While oil and gas prices have risen, the wholesale cost of power in Europe – which makes up the biggest part of our bills – has actually come down in the last few years due to falling demand, increased efficiency and an oversupply of energy from all the renewable installations that have come onto the grid, supported by various government subsidies.

Yet prices are at near record levels, not just because subsidy and investment costs are passed on to the consumer, but also because it’s harder for traditional utility firms to operate when they have to shut down their gas plants to prevent an oversupply of wind power overloading the grid.

Facing an increasingly uncertain position and an unstable policy landscape, the companies are also reluctant to invest at a time when we need to carry out massive upgrades to the grid and develop new forms of generating capacity to make the necessary curbs to our carbon emissions in order to prevent dangerous climate change.

The Royal Academy of Engineering this week became the latest group to warn of potential blackouts in the UK in the next few years, not because we need to build more power stations now but because the market isn’t functioning in the way we need it to.

Faced with such a complicated and confusing situation, it’s very difficult to know how we can address the problem. But I’ve come to two conclusions. Firstly, the UK needs to get used to the idea of paying more for power. The era of cheap energy isn’t just over; it was an illusion in the first place. Yes, UK energy prices may have been kept down in the last few decades by an oil boom that is inevitably if not consistently declining at the same time as global demand for energy is massively increasing.

But in previous generations we subsidised the fossil fuel industry (and to some extent still do), produced nuclear power without taking into account its radioactive waste and pumped millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere in a way we now know is unsustainable. So we need to move to less damaging ways of generating electricity that will eventually come down in price but for now require large amounts of investment to get them off the ground (just as the oil and gas industry has had for many years).

My other conclusion is that politicians need to stop announcing headline grabbing policies that only attempt to address the symptoms not the cause of the problem. Labour’s suggestion of a price-freeze only further destabilises the situation and makes it even more risky for energy firms to invest the money we need them to. And the Conservatives’ suggestions that consumers should be automatically placed on the lowest possible tariff and be able to switch supplier more easily ignores the fact that competition for customers is a very small factor in the prices of the small number of firms that dominate the consumer market.

Where our energy comes from and how much we pay for it are two of the biggest challenges facing our society . Let’s stop pretending we can address them overnight with simplistic measures that in the long-run will only make things worse.


Readers' comments (31)

  • I suggest everyone reads the 'Zero Carbon Britain' report produced by the Centre for Alternative Energy (http://zerocarbonbritain.com/). This shows how we could resolve both supply and demand in a sustainable way...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I suggest everyone reads the 'Zero Carbon Britain' report produced by the Centre for Alternative Energy (http://zerocarbonbritain.com/). This shows how we could resolve both supply and demand in a sustainable way...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I must agree that we have to make the most of the foolish massive investment in wind-power. However, the issue of pricing of energy does deserve more consideration.
    Those of us who have been involved in power generation for many years will remember that the CEGB used to publish its generating costs regularly and these allowed users to plan their costs and to question inordinate price rises. The "Free-market" has enabled generators and distributors to hide behind a plethora of excuses that are not in the public domain. It would appear that opacity allows much larger profits than transparency did.

    It is almost amusing to see the fear generated by price-capping threats.
    The power generating industry needs to be brought to heel and the sooner the better for everyone but the power giants.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The problem of capacity has been driven by the hopeless insistence that coal fired plants are shut down. Whatever we in the UK or Europe may achieve in the so called global warning debate, the continued expansion of Asian coal burning makes our efforts of minimal consequence, it is all very well standing on the moral high ground, but when the lights go out, no one will see you there.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AD & Biogas from every form of compostable material not used in more economic way (recycling of paper & card ~only after checking of NO better use of packaging than just one use transit) could add to UK energy source supply. When farm slurry & sewage added in as "feedstock" & not needing landfill or other disposal this ought to be viable & reduce L.Auth's costs

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The false fantasies of being in the public's best interest, regarding privatising the utilities, is eventually showing it was at the public's expense. Take EDF for example. They, in a way, are like the old CEGB as they are owned by the French government. EDF continues to be a successful and profitable company. When this country had nationalised industries making good profits the government privatised them for a quick short term gain to the crown coffers, no wonder this country is in such a financial mess. The other trouble with our governments, as the article partly divulges, is the complication of certain sectors of privatised industry with regard to subsidies that many are unaware of. Many power customers do not realise they are subsidising wind, solar, elderly, etc and assume this is paid from the increasing taxation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Energy production needs to be safe, inexhaustible and nearly free. Not just for the UK but for the world - that should be our goal for humanity. Getting there will be hard on our generation and the next few generations to come, but it’s a goal worth striving for.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yet another opinion piece based on the assumption that we "need" unlimited cheap electrical energy. We do not; we are an animal species powered by an efficient internal metabolism.

    The UK population could have comfortable and probably more interesting and enjoyable lives if we cut out over-consumption, either 3 or 4 electricity free days per week, or intermittent supplies every day, or rationing, or other demand management through smart metering.

    There are a million and one ways to use less or no electricity at all or even have home which are energy positive (though that tends to dd to the problem of too much at the moment). We should be looking at inherently affordable approaches instead of a) committing to systems we can't afford to dismantle (Nuclear) or too variable to be grid connected at large scale (Solar).

    Small isolated solar / battery setups mass produced and located at every house or postcode scale would provide adequate power for essential services.

    Only idiots prefer the electric guitar to acoustic, and the same goes for virtually every other technology. It really does appear that quality of life (and apparently the capacity for rational thought) goes out of the window when Electricity comes in through the door.

    Why does nobody understand the difference between "useful" and "essential"?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We should finally introduce a serious carbon tax and stop subsidizing. This would be simpler and more efficient.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How cab they pay dividends and remove even more money from the company when they are making losses already?
    It is like looting a burning house because the police is busy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article