Wednesday, 30 July 2014
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Does Sony’s smart wig take wearable computers too far?

Wearable electronics will change everything, we’re told. A coming slew of new technologies from head-mounted computers like Google Glass to colour-changing, smartphone-charging, solar-powered t-shirts are going to integrate electronic systems even more closely into our lives. Our devices won’t be a touch away: they’ll be hands-free, always on, seeing what we see.

The latest idea in this vein to emerge is for a so-called “smart wig”: a device incorporating sensors, a communication interface and an actuator for tactile feedback all hidden within a hairpiece. Sony have just filed a patent application for such a product outlining how they imagine it might work and what it might be used for.

The application makes for some entertaining reading. The smart wig might be used as a navigation tool, particularly for blind people, by detecting surround objects using ultrasound and using vibrations or even small electric shocks to alert users when they need to change direction.

The wig could monitor users’ health or contain a video camera along the lines of Google Glass but also be used as a remote control device operated by facial expressions. The hairpiece itself could even alter its appearance in response to changes in mood.

/c/d/u/TE_Sony_smart_wig.jpg

Sony’s “smart wig” could provide feedback through vibrations or electric shocks through the skull.

This takes a rather farcical turn when the application mentions “dynamic” fake moustaches. Imagine encountering someone in the street making rather strange facial gestures and then watching their hair turn green and their moustache start pointing to the sky. It’s this nonsensical picture that hints at the root of what might be wrong with an admittedly original and imaginative idea.

The advantages Sony describe of a smart wig are that it would be more comfortable than other wearable devices, more likely to be instinctively protected by the user because of its location, and invisible to other people (although there’s also an optimistic suggestion that a visible version could become fashionable).

I remain to be convinced, however, that most people would want to wear a device so integrated into their person that other people would have no idea what they were doing as they twitched their facial muscles or appeared to talk to themselves.

We’ve written before about how Google Glass might find its niche as more of a professional tool than a general device widely adopted by the public. Part of the reason for that suspicion is wearing Google Glass makes people look pretty ridiculous. But at least you know what they’re doing when they tilt their head and shout ‘Ok Glass, take a photo’.

A smart wig might similarly have some great specific applications: the blind person’s location sensor sounds like a good one, and people taking part in medical trials might be much more open to wearing a simple head-mounted sensor than covering themselves in electrodes.

But while not having a pretentious glasses frame plonked on your face could be an attraction to the general public, plugging in an unnecessary hair piece and shouting commands at it doesn’t sound like that much of a better way to active your computer.

Computer companies are striving for ever-greater integration of their devices to the point we barely know they’re there. But do we really want that? Smartphones have had revolutionary effects on our lives both positive and negative. They may distract us from what’s going on around us but at least we have to stop and think about using them separately and can then return to what we were doing.

What remains to be seen is whether true multi-tasking is really possible. Can we safely drive and monitor all the information being flashed before our eyes by our head-mounted screen? Can we hold a conversation if our computer is near-enough wired into our head? Perhaps we can, but sometimes it’s nicer just to leave our phones in our pockets.


Readers' comments (16)

  • RF Sources slowly are reaching the human head. It must create some worry for sure.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sounds like it could have a few uses in areas where people do not need to overly interact with the thing, health monitoring, the guidance for the blind being two.

    Surely input could be picked up from the user's thought patterns, maybe not with current technology, but if you're going to shoot for the moon as this concept appears to, then push a few boundaries

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Great for covert operatives (ok, spys), where they could have lots of high tech "stuff" warning them if they were going to be attacked from behind, where to go, or look etc, yet not be so obvious tech users...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's going to put a whole new meaning to 'tearing your hair out"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is a great pity that these time wasters have nothing better to do, solve some real problems rather than dreaming of what might be (for some).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Like I said with Google Glass, wearable tech that distracts the user with HUD's of any kind should be shelved until they perfect driverless transportation. Once they can get a car from point a to point b without human interaction - then wearable tech will have it's niche. It's bad enough with people who text and drive, can you imagine if you are merging into rush hour traffic on the 101 and weather/traffic report suddenly appears in front of your eyes?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The prospect of a wig with a head-up display is currently causing some amusement at Engineer Towers.

  • I presume any comms could be made via the hairport - or would this be too much toupee - doh!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Great concept!
    Add this to the story about the washable antenna (complete with all manner of bells and whistles) also in today's issue and a visit to the barber for a 'short-back and sides' should be fun!

    I have a recollection -buried deep and possibly even covered by the Official secrets act- that one of my US clients (I shall not name them!) was asked by Uncle Sam if it was possible to incorporate a particular metal filament into the material which (sold world-wide) ended up as the 'scrambled egg' that adorns the full dress uniform head-gear of senior officers in many Services: good and bad, friend and foe! It was hoped to spot them from space?
    Best
    Mike B

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A hat could look less ridiculous with different styles depending gender and age. As I now have very little hair, suddenly appearing with a wig would make me look stupid

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I used to work for Sony and have patents with them. They make a lot of money off of patent licensing and will patent anything not totally off the wall that is relevant to their business. It is also used as a defense mechanism and, as happens here, you wonder where there product development is really going.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Digital Edition

The Engineer July Digi Issue

Poll

London Mayor Boris Johnson is lobbying for a £10 additional charge for diesel cars to drive into Central London by 2020, and for road tax on diesel cars and all pre-2006 cars to be increased, to counter air pollution. What option most closely matches your opinion on this?

Previous Poll

Europe's largest tidal array in the Pentand Firth off Orkney will eventually generate up to 86MW of power. What will it take for tidal energy to make an appreciable contribution to the UK's energy needs?

Read and comment on the results here