Saturday, 25 May 2013
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Back to the future with the strangest flying machine

I love ekranoplans. And I’m not alone.

For those not in the know, ekranoplans resemble a cross between seaplanes and hydrofoils. Essentially aircraft, they exploit a phenomenon called the wing-in-ground effect, where flying close to a surface gives a winged body extra lift.

Weird-looking things, ekranoplans. They tend to have stubby, wide wings; fuselages which turn into speedboat hulls at the bottom; dramatic, sweeping tailplanes; engines in odd places. And they can be huge. The best-known one is the ex-Soviet military Lun-class, often known in the West as the Caspian Sea Monster; weighing 400 tonnes and 73m long, it’s one of the largest aircraft ever built, with four turbojet engines mounted on either side of its cockpit and carrying six missile launchers in ridged dinosaur-like crests across its back.

The dinosaur aspect is part of its appeal, because ekranoplans are, to all intents and purposes, extinct. Although the Caspian Sea Monster was a spectacular sight when it was in service in the late ’80s, only one of the leviathans was ever to take to the seas, and it now sits, rusting massively and picturesquely, in a dock in the Russian city of Kaspiysk — a wonderful gallery of photos, taken by a Russian enthusiast, can be seen here. Although the Soviet Navy also used a smaller class of ekranoplan, they never really took off elsewhere, which is why the Russian name is usually used.

Lun

Source: Wikipedia Commons

The Lun-class Caspian Sea Monster was designed to carry Soviet troops and tanks

There’s a lot of enthusiasm around for this sort of other-worldly, dead-end technology. Ekranoplans, even though they’re in the past, seem to belong to a future that never happened; they’re a seductive vision of what might have been. Those romantic types among us like to think of worlds where transatlantic zeppelins plied the skies, while sleek ekranoplans skimmed the world’s great lakes and waterways. Who wouldn’t love to think of speeding above the surface of the English Channel or Lake Erie — or the Caspian, or the Black Sea — with a rooster-tail of spray rising behind the swept-back wings of a luxurious sea-skimmer?

You can see this retro-futurism everywhere. Whenever film-makers want to evoke an eerie alternative present, they stick some airships on the screen. The polished brass and varnished wood of Steampunk — an imagined Victoriana where steam technology was developed to an extreme and Babbage got the funding for his Difference Engine — is around everywhere, powered by appreciation for the satisfying clunk and whirr of mechanisms rather than the sterile, plastic-coated bleep of electronica and the beauty and individualism of the hand-crafted over the anonymity of mass-production. I believe that this may have some significance for the image of engineering, but that’s a matter for another blog.

But back to ekranoplans, and it seems that all is not lost for these spectacular watercraft. For the latest ekranoplan fan to come out of the closet is none other than swashbuckling aerospace pioneer Burt Rutan, founder of Scaled Composites, inventor of the X-prize winning SpaceShipOne and father of Virgin Galactic. Rutan’s latest project — he calls it his retirement project — is a hybrid ekranoplan/seaplane. Rutan is building the craft purely as a personal pleasure vehicle, planing to fly it over the lakes in Northern Idaho near his home, but he also wants it to be able to soar out of ground effect to fly to other lakes and rivers. A stylish water-hopper; it’s enough to gladden the heart of any retro-futurist.

And that’s not all. Although I haven’t been able to find any confirmation elsewhere, the wikipedia page for the Lun-class says that the Russian Ministry of Defence has approved a revival of construction of the craft, to begin next year. The mind boggles uneasily as to what plans Vladimir Putin might have for it, but the Caspian Sea Monster might fly again.

Readers' comments (16)

  • Great article! I too imagine these beasts in a perverted parallel technological world - sort of like a machine in Terry Gilliam's film 'Brazil'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • James May did a piece on Ekranoplans for his 'Big ideas' show some time ago, and I remember having a look through some articles on the net about them back then, and I don't think the Lun-Class Ekranoplan is THE Caspian Sea Monster...the one they called the Caspian Sea Monster was a reasearch craft from athe 60's and was even bigger than the Lun...100m+ and 540 tonnes! it didn't have the armaments you see in the photo above, and had a 'v' shaped tail...you can see it on youtube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8Nu94khHoo

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I heard that the fuel efficency of this type of craft is very good, better than an aircraft that first has to reach 31000 feet. Can anyone confirm that?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Presumably they are a dead-end technology because they cannot cope with heavy seas? Does anyone know? How far above the waves does the ground effect extra lift function? Moderrn technology might be able to control the height more effectively than older systems and make the craft a practical proposition.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • That has got be the queerest and most magnificent machine I've ever seen in my life. Stunning! Makes me wonder what other gems lurked behind the Iron Curtain?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Stephen B Whiteley...I read that the Caspian Sea Monster tests in the 60's had it 'flying' at about 20m above the surface, but it was only rated at 3m...I totally agree though, I think they only worked on the Caspian Sea for a reason...minimal compensation required for waves due to it being an enclosed body of water, surely as soon as it hit the open seas, the ground effect would be disrupted by the waves effectively causing a change in distance between surface and 'wing'?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am sure there is a very nice and efficient buggy whip design out there somewhere. The commitment of scarce resources to its production, redesign and development is not recommended however.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ekranoplanes will never be competative to conventional jet planes because of air resistance while crusing at sea level. Jet planes have minimum air resistance reducing the fuel cost /km and minimum disturbances from thunderstorms, sea tides conditions and navigational restrictions. Besides they will add to pollution

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Iranians recently unveiled a squadron of mini ekranoplans - a terrifying thought for all shipping in the Gulf. Guestimates put production costs at a few tens of thousands of dollars, they could be launched in swarms. http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/28/iran-unveils-squadrons-of-flying-boats/

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Stuart,

    Thank you so much for this point of history.
    The link and the photo's are just brilliant.
    thank you

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Digital Edition

The Engineer May Digital Edition

Poll

Digital healthcare gives clinicians the ability to monitor patients in their homes, rather than in hospital. Will this create problems or opportunities?

Previous Poll

Forward-looking flying car specialist Terrafugia has unveiled a new autopilot-equipped STOVL concept which it says could be on sale in 8-12 years. But will the science-fiction staple of the flying car ever take off?

Read and comment on the results here