Thursday, 30 October 2014
Advanced search

Holding out for a hero

Ask a member of the public to name a great British engineer and you’ll probably get one name: IK Brunel. Ask for a living person and you’re more likely to get a blank face. While pure science boasts multiple prominent figures leading debate in popular intellectual and media circles, engineering remains in the background, seen as functional, important but not particularly exciting.

brunel

Great, but not exactly current

The public perception and image of engineering was a key topic of debate at this week’s UK Manufacturing Summit at the IMechE. The institution’s chief exec, Stephen Tetlow pointed out that while many engineers know Britain is the world’s sixth largest manufacturing nation (or seventh, depending on your league table), all you hear in the pub is how we don’t make anything any more.

Business minister Mark Prisk highlighted the fact that 43 per cent of graduates have a STEM related degree but only five per cent go into manufacturing. Perhaps there isn’t so much a shortage of skills as of one of enthusiasm. The session’s conclusion was that we need a better supply chain of young people, grabbing their attention while still in primary school, and nurturing their interest through A levels, degrees and apprenticeships.

We’re still left with the well-worn question of how to get young people (and the population in general) more excited about engineering. And one of the more interesting ideas of the day was a call for a TV show promoting the sector. Given the wealth of activity and innovation that goes on in Britain alone, this stuck me as a genuinely interesting proposition that really could work.

There are countless projects that could capture the imagination of the public. As a journalist for The Engineer, I frequently find myself explaining stories I’ve covered to friends who have no technical background but are fascinated nonetheless. (There’s always the possibility they’re just humouring me but my friends are generally pretty ruthless).

An engineering TV programme could reveal to the public how much manufacturing work still goes on here, and highlight the need to preserve and build the sector. Factory floor visits wouldn’t make for thrilling viewing, true, but testing the latest engine prototypes or seeing spacecraft with British-made components in action would get people tuning in.

Modern computer graphics can bring potentially dry and difficult subjects to life, as witnessed by the multiple well-received physics programmes of the last few years. And meeting the people whose lives are changed by technology, whether patients of robotic surgeons or developing world communities benefiting from new energy solutions, would hammer home the impact of engineering ideas on the real world.

Vital to any successful factual TV show are its presenters. You need intelligent, charismatic and entertaining guides to keep the pace, make people smile or gasp and explain the difficult bits without sending everyone to sleep. Engineering needs a TV champion. And at the moment there isn’t one.

Sure, there are journalists and presenters who occasionally cover the topic. Former Scrapheap Challenge presenter and sometime Red Dwarf star Robert Llewellyn has navigated Channel Five viewers through a reworking of Discovery Channel show How Do They Do It? and produced his own YouTube series (as well as hosting The Engineer awards for the past two years).

But what’s really needed is a voice that resonates with a younger audience and can connect the predominantly middle-aged white male world of engineering with our more plural, modern society. And that’s why no member of the Top Gear team should be considered. The last thing that’s needed is a badly dressed, conservative motormouth making jokes based on crude stereotypes.

And that’s not to say a middle-aged white man couldn’t do the job. Just look at Prof Brian Cox, the man who’s made science, if not quite cool, then mainstream, accessible and current. Indeed the words used at the IMechE summit were ‘a Brian Cox of engineering’. Cox is seemingly everywhere at the moment, so if he were given the role his fame would probably overshadow the whole project. But this should be the model.

Given the dearth of famous engineers or even famous people with engineering degrees, the field is open to suggestions. Dr Mark Miodownik, presenter of last year's Royal Institution Christmas Lectures, is currently working on television projects. And there are certainly plenty of science writers out there who could have a great stab.

The Engineer’s features editor, Stuart Nathan, suggested author and journalist Angela Saini, apparently described as the person who 'makes geeks cool'. An engineering graduate and former BBC reporter, she’s just published a book about the rise of India as a scientific superpower, entitled Geek Nation.

Unless we can find someone who can help grab the attention of young people and the wider public, we’ll just have to get working on a time machine so we can bring back Brunel.


Readers' comments (32)

  • Try Richard Noble, whose heading up the fantastic Bloodhound programme, endeavouring to excel 1000mph in a land vehicle.
    The project is also designed to attract the attention of as many schools as possible, with a view to create a desire in young people to become Engineers!

    Check out the website!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I suggest Tim Smit of Eden Project fame. He was interviewed on Radio 4's Saturday Live a few weeks back and genuinely seemed in touch with the world of the Engineer. I haven't ever heard that level of enthusiasm before, it was wonderful.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My nomination is Dr Carmen Torres-Sanchez

    http://hw.academia.edu/CarmenTorresSanchez

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It could be called "Tomorrow's World, Today"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Discovery Channel has been thinking along these lines too, specifically female. Try Konnie Huq or Susie Perry (sensible and knowledgeable when not 'entertaining' on the Gadget Show). Agree with the Top Gear problem - entertainers (clowns) rather than knowledge-givers (William Woolard or the late, great Raymond Baxter they ain't!) How about Sqn Ldr Andy Green? Certainly better dressed than James May...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What about Andrea Rodney of Hone-All Precision? Andrea was a panel member at the Summit and seems to couple a real passion for manufacturing and engineering with an apparently down-to-earth approach that would be great for a television programme such as this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What about a link with areas of popular culture that already hold sway but expanding the engineering links e.g. Formula One where we lead the world with a number famous names such as Adrian Newey or the British Cycling team and the engineering that went in to developing the track bike, or ...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Take a look at the work of the Bluebird Electric land and water speed records and you will see an exciting and relevant engineering project as well as over 100 years of engineering pedigree from the Campbell family now in its third generation with Don Wales (who also holds the world record for Steam Cars). I was so inspired, as a teenager, by the accomplishments of Donald Campbell I went into design and innovation and now run the Bluebird Project with Don Wales and try to get young engineers involved at every stage. The project has spawned manufacture of electric vehicles and boats.

    Richard Noble's Bloodhound project is incredibly exciting, but Bluebird Electric is dealing with technologies the next generation will be utilising in their every day lives.

    www.bluebirdspeedrecords.com

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think the biggest issue the programme needs to tackle is to overcome people's indifference to engineering.

    To this end, the point of such a programme should maybe not be to highlight flagship engineering projects but rather to highlight all the things that we take for granted in our everyday lives that would not be possible without engineering.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Here's one for you: a documentary series covering one of the nuclear new builds. How many boxes would this tick? All engineering disciplines are on site throughout the duration of the project. Visually, the site is rammed with the sort of very large equipment needed for a big civil project (and the shiny stuff too prior to going live). The entire thing is deadline driven, adding to the tension that a skilled documentary maker could convey. Mix in some 'human interest' elements, like young people doing their first job a long way from home and you've surely got a BAFTA winner in the making.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article