Jason Ford
Jason Ford
News editor
Sport, security and surveillance
Briefing starts the week with hearty congratulations to the nation’s paralympians, who this weekend nudged the UK to second in the games medal table.
Yesterday, ParalympicsGB won seven golds in five sports and 18 medals in all, with David Weir contributing to this tally with victory in the T54 5,000m wheelchair race.
This week sees Weir’s racing chair designer Dan Chambers pick up a prestigious award of his own from the Royal Academy of Engineering, which is to award him the Sir Frank Whittle Medal.
Chambers, co-founder and director of Draft Wheelchairs Ltd, is being acknowledged for his ‘outstanding and sustained achievement’ and will pick up his award as part of Dr Amit Goffer’s public lecture entitled Powered exoskeletons: overcoming vertical mobility impairments.
Goffer’s lecture forms part of RAEng’s Side by side: innovation in disability sport series of events that take place this week that will showcase engineering innovation in disabled sports.
Questions were raised over the weekend about the extent to which innovation should help athletes, with the Mail Online reporting accusations of ‘technological doping’ from a French paralympic official, who believes ParalympicsGB’s investment in advanced equipment is turning the event into ‘the equivalent of Formula 1’.
In the Mail Online report Rudy Van Abeele, the French Paralympic team’s deputy manager, was joined by Suzanne Harris-Henry, secretary-general of the Jamaican Paralympic Committee in questioning the costs of elite racing chairs, arguing that their price puts other nations at a disadvantage.
On a different level entirely, South African paralympian Oscar Pistorius has raised questions about the length of blades worn by fellow competitors in track events.
The Olympics and Paralympics have so far been a huge success for the organizing committee and everyone involved in keeping London moving.
One wonders how much work has gone on behind the scenes in order to keep the games safe?
In a related theme, the Centre for Defence Enterprise (CDE) has issued a call for research proposals for security and intelligence applications.
The call, issued on behalf of MI5 and GCHQ, is keen to receive proposals from organisations - particularly SMEs - that have not previously worked with the security and intelligence agencies.
MI5 is said to be particularly interested in covert surveillance techniques and threat identification.
For example, when investigating a terrorist, what covert surveillance techniques could be employed to gain knowledge of the terrorist’s location and activities?
Similarly, once aware of a terrorist threat to a crowded environment - but without some of the specifics - how could the threat be identified?
GCHQ’s focus is on online identity assurance and management, as well as open source analytics to help identify and classify different types of behaviours or significant events.
According to CDE, this call for proposals focuses on short three month proof-of-concept and/or demonstration-of-benefit studies that have the potential to lead to next generation solutions for a range of security challenges.
This could be partial demonstration of a new technology, or a theoretical or experimental approach that allows a better understanding of the proposed systems/techniques.
Subject to a successful security check, successful applicants will be invited to a half day seminar to launch the call on 3 October 2012 in central London. Find out the specifics by clicking here.
Finally, a survey published today shows that trading conditions remained tough for Britain’s manufacturers over the last quarter.
Issued by EEF and business advisers BDO, the survey shows a weakening in output and orders, with slower demand at home and abroad hitting order books.
According to Tom Lawton, head of Manufacturing at BDO, Europe continues to serve as a drag on exports and previously buoyant emerging markets are beginning to falter.





Readers' comments (5)
Peter Field | 3 Sep 2012 1:51 pm
The paralympics is well worth while and indicates to all just what one is capable of especially if disabled. Look up to the stars; not at your feet. This ethos is especially important at a time the Government must make cut-backs and get more "disabled" back into work.
What is plainly ridiculous, however, is for the world in general to take the medal league table seriously because only a small proportion of countries have the technical and economic ability to provide the athletes with the necessary accessories and training. The same applies to a lesser extent to the olympics.
The medal table makes the UK feel good but a fairer table would be to indicate medals won per population and economic output with a suitable combination being per GDP of each country.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 3 Sep 2012 3:42 pm
I suppose we could all go back to pogostick racing and throwing the orange in order to "level the playingfield" That is a sure way to achieve nothing for those who strive to overcome their disabilities with the help of us all.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
reece | 3 Sep 2012 9:57 pm
The tech invented for these games will go on to help people with disabilities in the future just as f1 technology gets into everyday cars. This should be invested in more by other socieities and not less by the UK. Go team GB!!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Stuart Caines | 4 Sep 2012 9:44 am
First of all congratulations to Dan Chambers for the recognition of his achievements. Secondly, as far as "technology doping" is concerned, it's outrageous. There are no rules against the equipment being used and the option is open to all countries.
One can appreciate the smaller countries who can't afford the research and development but isn't this argument of it must be a fair contest against the original spirit of the games? It was created to give people with disabilities from the war the chance to be active and get involved.
Nowadays the games should purely be about those athletes overcoming their disabilities and striving to do the best they can; medal tables should be irrelevant. As long as each individual athlete can say they tried their absolute hardest that is all that matters.
You can't blame technology, some of the technology has actually made the game safer, wheelchair design for the basketball is a key example!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
mikeblamey | 8 Sep 2012 4:52 am
Technology -Don't ya luv it..and its advance is the very reason and route whereby we, as Engineers,make our marks on the ascent of mankind. The fact that we have to do so in a society still far too dominated by the 'meja' and the arts? -who are the primary proponants of the nonsense that is league tables, celebrity culture and the jeer, snear and smear nature of t6oo much of our, sadly, adversarial society...is annoying.
Congratulations to all those who have, as Engineers and technologists, had any part in creating the outstanding structures, systems and mechanisms which have allowed ordinary persons who had a misfortune to rise far above it -and the rest of us - and show extraordinary.
Best wishes
Mike B
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment