Tuesday, 21 October 2014
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Time for another landmark in British computing

Tomorrow marks the 20th anniversary of a great landmark of British engineering: on 6 August 1991, a young researcher from London working at European nuclear research centre CERN published the world’s first website using the first web browser on the first web server.

By inventing the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee created a tool that would change many aspects of our lives, from how we communicate and gather information to the way we shop and have fun. It helped bring the internet into public consciousness and shaped the way it developed – indeed many people still confuse the web and the internet.

But despite being invented by a Brit, the web quickly came to be dominated by American entrepreneurs and innovators. Think of a famous web company and it will likely have originated in the US: Google, Facebook, eBay, Twitter. (The only British example I could think of was the Internet Movie Database – IMDB – and even that is now owned by Amazon.)

In fact Britain has lagged behind in general over the last two decades when it comes to the computer and electronics industries. The time when companies like Acorn and Amstrad were turning innovation into popular and lucrative products was over relatively quickly. Today we have no big electronics manufacturer to compete with Sony, Philips or Apple. ARM Holdings may have processors in 20 per cent of the world’s PCs and almost every brand of mobile phone you care to mention, but the company is the exception rather than the rule.

Video games represent one sector of the industry where Britain has punched above its weight over the last 20 years –­ Wimbledon-based Eidos created Tomb Raider and Lara Croft, arguably one of the most famous video game characters ever, while a significant cluster of firms has grown up around Dundee. But even here the industry has struggled recently, with most UK companies going under or being bought up by foreign publishers.

In a market where many other countries offer significant tax breaks to games developers, a debate is still going on between British industry and the Treasury over what support government can provide. George Osborne scrapped tax relief proposals shortly after the 2010 election and, despite recent plans for more R&D credits, industry bodies say they are struggling under the burden of HMRC.

For all this gloom, however, there might now have an opportunity to change the fortunes of the UK’s computer and electronics sector. The internet and how we use it are changing. The web might not be dead but the amount of time we spend on it looks only likely to decrease as more and more people buy smartphones and access the internet through dedicated applications (apps) – a quarter of adults and half of teenagers now own a smartphone, according to research published this week.

This cultural shift creates a new chance for British firms to innovate and for creative entrepreneurs to bring new ideas to the fore. Apps and smartphones provide a way for companies to develop software products and services at relatively low cost and put them in front of a large global audience with ease. If companies can find new ways to make the most of this rapidly growing market then tax breaks become less important.

What Britain would really benefit from though is a shift to more of a Silicon Valley way of thinking. Around San Jose in California are thousands of high-tech companies all striving to become the next Twitter or Intel. They have strong links to academia but a ruthlessly commercial focus. There are even Silicon Valley boot camps for up-and-coming entrepreneurs.

An attempt to recreate such an environment in the UK is underway in East London. The area around Old Street has become known as Silicon Roundabout and the government hopes to see the area between there and the Olympic Park in Straford become a technology hub. Companies including BT, Vodafone, Cisco Systems, Facebook and Google have already committed to developing facilities in the area while Imperial, UCL and Loughborough universities have signed on as academic partners. And the Technology Strategy Board has launched a £1m competition for funding for digital entrepreneurs.

The web was and is an incredible tool, and we should be proud of being able to add Berners-Lee’s name to the likes of Babbage and Turing in the list of great British contributors to the world of computers. But digital technology is the fastest moving of them all, and unless we seize the initiative as it undergoes its current cycle of upheaval then we’ll find ourselves left behind once again.


Readers' comments (6)

  • Berners-Lee was sufficiently savvy to avoid the usual manner in which the UK system and the Establishment treats genius. Poor Alan Turing (probably the reason, along with other inventors that we do not presently speak German!) was hounded to suicide. Babbage died in a lunatic asylum, primarily because his ideas were ridiculed/ignored/stolen!

    My advice to any UK based inventor: go quickly to a nation that will value your contribution: the clerks here who will have far too much say in any exploitation of your skills will not.
    MJB

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The treatment of today's brilliant scientists aside, it's worth pointing out that Babbage suffered a mental breakdown following the deaths of his wife, father and two of his children in one year, and Turing committed suicide following chemical castration as a punishment for 'gross indecency' ie because he was gay.

  • Great article and good to see the London Silicon Roundabout mentioned.

    Michael your advice to 'Run away to a nation that will value your contribution' isn't the best way to create the next silicon valley here in UK.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting that the research is about ownership, not usage. The raison d'etre of the smartphone is as a vehicle to sell a contract, all my stepson's peer group "have" a smartphone, very few actually use them for much other than phone/text because it is simply too expensive. The wide number of different deals available makes sure that the customer remains confused and gets ripped off every time, (a technique seemingly adopted by the energy companies). There are very few actual situations when instant internet access through a handheld unit is of any practical use or confers any financial advantage, good for the pub quiz, but they are already onto that one. I neither want or need to surf the net on my phone, my fridge, my microwave, or my toilet. I use my computer because it gives me the best experience. Whilst I agree with the overall direction of the article, I feel the (unqoted) source of this survey is merely attempting to "talk the industry up".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The research was conducted by Ofcom as part of its Communications Market 2011 survey. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/market-data/communications-market-reports/cmr11/

    For the specific statistic quoted see here: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/market-data/communications-market-reports/cmr11/uk/1.37

  • I take on board the editors comments with thanks: I was aware of Babbage's 'history' and that of Turing: my point is that it is rarely concerns of an inventor with their technology that is the vehicle for catastrophic problems: but a complete failure on the part of any social/legal/support 'system' to recognise that Genius does not operate as normal humans do: sets its own 'rules' and should be recognised for such and allowance made.

    I am confident that there are a lot of lawyers and patent agents who believe that Berners -Lee was indeed 'mad' (I am sure he is not!) for not trying to make money out of his pivotal contribution to the ascent of man!

    Best wishes
    Mike B

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mike: I think your advice is second on the list to most UK inventors, one is invent, two be ready to leave before the RDAs, Biz Link etc. kill any enthusiasm you have for progressing it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I worked for a company which became american, we developed a lot of new products, which were never given to our plant to manufacture, but taken to 3rd world nations, to max profit, beware if you work for an american company, the doller is king, our plant has closed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article