Wednesday, 19 June 2013
Advanced search

UK sensors enhance electron microscopes

Advanced sensor technology could improve the quality of images from transmission electron microscopes.

TEMs are used to examine structures of materials

TEMs are used to examine structures of materials

Transmission electron microscopes are routinely used in laboratories to examine the structure of materials on a very fine scale. However, the charge-coupled devices (CCDs) they use as detectors to record digital images of such materials limit both the resolution of the instruments, as well as the speed at which they can capture images.

Ideally, it would be preferable to use an imager to capture the electrons transmitted through the thin specimens of materials directly, but since fast electrons have energies typically from 100kV to 300kV, this would destroy commercial semiconductor devices very quickly. Even if they weren’t, the high-energy electrons would quickly saturate the pixels in the devices, which would then produce unacceptable images.

Hence, the CCDs that are presently used to capture images from such microscopes are coupled to scintillators that convert the high-energy beam of electrons into photons before they are transferred through lenses or fibre optics onto the surface of the CCD which can then safely create the digital image.

However, not only does the coupling of the scintillator to the CCD introduce losses and inefficiencies, the resolution of the resulting image created by the CCD is limited too, as each electron that hits the scintillator generates light that is spread over many pixels in the CCD device.

For those reasons, researchers at Oxford and Sheffield universities led by professors Angus Kirkland and Nigel Allinson realised that they would need to develop new sensor architectures that were radically different from those of a CCD if they were to be used directly in a transmission electron microscope.

One group of such sensors under investigation by the researchers are called active pixel sensors (APS). Unlike the high-volume commercial CMOS APS counterparts commonly found in cameras that are manufactured on standard silicon substrates with a thickness of 0.5mm-1mm, these new radiation-hardened APS devices are built on substrates that are just a few tens of microns thick.

As a result, fast electrons with high energies that travel through the thin silicon devices will generate far fewer electron-hole pairs than they would through the thicker substrates, with the result that the saturation of the pixels in the devices is dramatically reduced.

Like commercial CMOS imagers, it is possible to address and read out signals from individual pixels or arrays of pixels from the radiation-hardened ultra-thin APS devices, unlike CCDs where the entire data from the device must be read out serially. This feature enables parts of an image captured by the device to be read out at thousands of frames per second.

One problem with such devices, however, is that because each pixel on the imager has its own set of logic associated with it, the fill factor - or the percentage area that can be used to capture electrons - can never be 100 per cent if it is illuminated from the front, unlike a CCD sensor that can achieve close to a 100 per cent fill. This problem can be overcome if the sensor is illuminated from the back

To address that particular issue, the developers have created a second class of detector that sports an entirely different architecture. In these so-called double-sided strip detectors (DSSDs), silicon strips are fabricated on both sides of a detector to provide a means of pinpointing the exact coordinates of any electrons that pass through it.

’Unlike CCDs, and APS detectors - which fall into a class of sensor called integrating detectors - the DSSDs are counting detectors that can determine the position of an incoming electron from the charge that accumulates on strips that lie orthogonally on both the front and the back of the sensor as the electron passes though them,’ said Kirkland.

If a fast electron should land between two of the silicon strips on the front of the device, it will generate a signal in both, with the result that it is then impossible to determine the exact location of the electron. However, the signals created by such electrons can then be rejected by analysing the readout from the device using software, eliminating any potential errors and ensuring the accuracy of the device.

’One advantage such devices have is that their modulation transfer function - a specification that incorporates both resolution and contrast data - is almost perfect. Another is that, because they are counting the electrons that hit them, they have an absolute ability to measure the differences between light and dark while never becoming saturated,’ said Kirkland.

“One advantage of DSSD devices is that their modulationtransfer function is almost perfect”
PROF ANGUS KIRKLAND

The disadvantage of the DSSD devices is that, unlike APS devices, they do not incorporate arrays of picture elements that can be read out individually, so they can only capture images at several frames per second. While that might be somewhat faster than a CCD, it is nowhere near the thousands of frames per second which can be captured with the CMOS APS devices.

Although each class of sensors has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, Kirkland said that there is no reason why both the APS and the DSSD sensors could not play an equally important role in capturing images directly from next-generation transmission electron microscopes.

’We anticipate that such microscopes will eventually have two sensors - one sitting above the other - which you can move in or out of the electron optical column. The fast programmable APS sensor will be used for real-time viewing of dynamic events. When you want the ultimate resolution, you will remove the APS sensor, insert the DSSD and use that effectively as a digital film,’ he said.

At the present time Kirkland said that several prototype APS devices have been fabricated and the first electron beam tests of those devices should take place over the next couple of months.

As for the DSSDs, work is somewhat less advanced, although several small prototypes have also been fabricated. Later this year Kirkland plans to make some larger-scale DSSDs and use those to record image data.

design essentials

The key facts to take away from this article

  • CCDs are currently used to capture images from electron microscopes
  • This can result in images with losses or that have a limited resolution
  • APS and DSSDs could help to obtain more accurate images
  • Researchers say both could be used to capture images in the future

 

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Digital Edition

The Engineer June Digital Edition

Poll

Many automotive companies are working technologies towards a 'self-driving' car. What are the biggest barriers to these finding a place on the road?

Previous Poll

What could universities do to prepare graduates better for careers in engineering?

Read and comment on the results here