Friday, 24 October 2014
Advanced search

March 1963: The Windscale AGR

At the beginning of the Swinging 60s, The Engineer reported on the commissioning of the UK’s experimental gas-cooled nuclear reactor. Almost 50 years later, we were there when it became the first reactor to be fully decommissioned.

The Sixties were about to start swinging, Britain was in the middle of Harold Wilson’s ‘white heat of technological revolution, and on the edge of the Lake District, a curious spherical structure had been built at the Windscale nuclear facility. In March 1963, The Engineer was marking the commissioning of a notable part of Britain’s pioneering role in the history of nuclear power: the Windscale Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactor, the forerunner for the AGR generation of nuclear power stations. Fifty years later, the WAGR still represents a milestone: it was the first power reactor in the world to be fully decommissioned.

WAGR

The WAGR complex, with the golf ball — containing the reactor and heat exchangers — in the foreground

WAGR was designed to test graphite-moderated, CO2-cooled reactors, which would replace the older Magnox reactors based on the technology developed for nearby Calder Hall, the world’s first operating power reactor (although it had mainly been used to make plutonium for nuclear weapons, and didn’t become a primarily power reactor until 1964). The Engineer’s lengthy feature describes the design of showing the reactor itself — mostly below ground level — and its fuel elements, all enclosed within the aluminium ‘golf ball’ which became an iconic part of the Windscale site, now subsumed within the larger Sellafield complex.

WAGR cutaway

Inside the WAGR golfball

The reactor was shut down in 1983, and became the demonstration project for decommissioning a nuclear reactor — a task which proved extremely tricky because, of course, it had not been built with decommissioning in mind; moreover, as became clear during the process, it contained many features which had been designed on the fly as part of the experimental nature of the project. I visited the site during the decommissioning project and it was an eerie experience — like many then-state of the art faciities built during the 1960s, it had the air of an abandonded James Bond villain lair. The engineers working on the project had to design equipment to dismantle the reactor and remove its components remotely, as I reported for Process Engineering (then a sister magazine to The Engineer) at the time.

Decommissioning at WAGR was completed in 2011 (six years later than scheduled), and once again The Engineer reported on it, making it one of the few technologies where we can claim to have been present from its earliest inception to its final demise.


Readers' comments (3)

  • Any chance of putting the original article up on the website as well?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Also a wonderful testimony on how badly engineering has been let down by successive governments from 'leaders to also ran' and now buying in the technology.

    Perhaps also a testimony as to the effectiveness of the propaganda of the anti-nuclear lobby, and one reason why we are now looking at a energy shortages as our coal fired stations are decommissioned.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So, "...from it's earliest inception to it's final demise.", we ought to know what the total cost was, what the taxpayer funded and what we got out of it. I bet it wasn't a profit.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article