Thursday, 23 May 2013
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

This week in 1875

I still find going through automatic carwashes a somewhat unnerving experience - like being swallowed by a psychedelic nylon whale. The sooner the procedure is over the better. So I’ve never really pondered at any great depth where the technology originated.

Browsing through the early Engineer archives may just have provided the answer, though.

Pictured is an invention by the Earl of Caithness for cleaning train carriages. The article of April 1975 reports on a test of the device near the running sheds of the Great Northern Railway, at King’s Cross.

Carriage

The device could clean a train carriage in just over four minutes, compared with 25 minutes for one man by hand

‘The invention consists essentially of two large vertical brushes made of horsehair driven by a little steam engine.  Water is thrown upon the side of each railway carriage, 2ft in advance of the brush, from a vertical iron pipe pierced with small holes, placed at an average distance of 8in. from each other,’ the article reads.

The invention consists of two large vertical brushes made of horsehair

‘The time occupied in so doing was four minutes and a-quarter, and although this was the first experiment tried, the results were gratifying.’

Indeed, Lord Caithness himself was quoted in the article as saying: “I am told it takes a man twenty-five minutes to clean one carriage by hand.” The toils of manual labour not being something he was probably accustomed to, of course.

Still, the article wasn’t without some more in-depth post-analysis of the cleaning process.

‘During those four minutes it became evident that three conditions at least affected the results. The chief of these was the velocity with which each carriage was drawn by the locomotive, those which were passed most rapidly being less perfectly cleansed than those drawn more slowly. Another condition was the amount of pressure of the brushes against the sides of the carriage, which was completely under the control of the man who used the apparatus. A third condition was the distance between the holes in the vertical pipes.’

Certainly something to ponder next time your car is dutifully swallowed and ejected in a clean state. 

Readers' comments (4)

  • I'll keep a look out for those guys that work the brushes. I'm sure the're missing from my local wash station! I can imagine they were not so clean and well dressed after their task.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fast forward to the 21st century and the technology is now almost obsolete as we have a surplus of labour from the former eastern bloc countries to go back to performing the work by hand.
    That's progress.........

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wish I could find one of those "little steam engines" to which he refers so off-handedly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "The article of April 1975..." (sic).
    The two operators were probably still overdressed even that long ago.
    We should try this again: if the rollers could be made to run quickly enough and enough pressure was applied by the two chaps in hats, the train could be shot out the other end at some velocity. Repeated often enough at strategic locations we'd have a high speed rail network...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Digital Edition

The Engineer May Digital Edition

Poll

Digital healthcare gives clinicians the ability to monitor patients in their homes, rather than in hospital. Will this create problems or opportunities?

Previous Poll

Forward-looking flying car specialist Terrafugia has unveiled a new autopilot-equipped STOVL concept which it says could be on sale in 8-12 years. But will the science-fiction staple of the flying car ever take off?

Read and comment on the results here