BAE to work on Mitsubishi jet
BAE Systems has signed an agreement with Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation of Japan to work on a new regional jet that should consume less fuel and emit less noise and fumes.
According to the agreement, the global defence, security and aerospace specialist will provide design integration and certification services for the propulsion systems of the next-generation Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ) aircraft.
An engineering team from BAE Systems’ Regional Aircraft business at Prestwick in Scotland will influence the new aircraft’s powerplant, pylon, nacelle, auxiliary power units and fuel systems.
The MRJ aircraft, a 70-90-seat family of twin-engine regional jets, will be powered by Pratt and Whitney PurePower PW1000G engines.
Mitsubishi has scheduled its first flight for 2012 and entry into commercial service is likely to be in 2014. Some of the current MRJ customers include All Nippon Airways and Trans States Holdings of the US.
Alan Fraser, managing director of BAE Systems Regional Aircraft, stated that the new contract took years to negotiate. ‘I believe we have a strong track record of experience and expertise and the award of this contract demonstrates the trust that Mitsubishi has in our people. This will allow us to build upon our existing capabilities and leverage them on to the next generation of aircraft. We hope this will be a first step in a developing relationship with Mitsubishi for the MRJ.’
Yukihiko Nakata, vice-president of system design at Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation, said the relationship with BAE Systems could help Mitsubishi develop a strong and firm position in the future regional jet market.
BAE Systems Regional Aircraft works with commercial and defence customers on their aircraft portfolios, fleet support and engineering. The company has a trading portfolio of more than 200 aircraft.
Separately, business at BAE Systems has been relatively unscathed by the revelation on 5 February that it is being fined a total of almost $400m (£256m) by the US Department of Justice and £30m by the UK Serious Fraud Office for providing false information on US regulatory filing and not disclosing accounting records on payments made to a former marketing adviser in Tanzania.
The US Department of Justice announced BAE Systems will pay a $400m fine for intentionally failing to enact appropriate, anti-bribery preventative measures, which contrasts assertions it made to the US government.
In a statement, the Justice Department condemned BAE Systems for making hundreds of millions of dollars in payments to third parties with full knowledge that money would be passed on to foreign government decision makers to favour the company in the award of defence contracts.
It also alleged these payments were not disclosed to the State Department as US laws and regulations require the necessary export licences.
In a statement, BAE Systems chairman Dick Olver said: ‘In 2000, the company gave a commitment to the US government that it would establish and comply with defined US regulatory requirements within a certain period and it subsequently failed to honour this commitment or to disclose its shortcomings.’
Under the agreement with the Serious Fraud Office, BAE Systems will plead guilty to one charge from 1999 of breach of duty to keep accounting records in relation to payments made to a marketing adviser in Tanzania. The company will pay an agreed penalty of £30m, comprising a fine to be determined by the court with the balance paid as a charitable payment for the benefit of Tanzania.
‘In the years since the conduct referred to in these settlements occurred, the company has systematically enhanced its compliance policies and processes with a view to ensuring that the company is as widely recognised for responsible conduct as it is for high-quality products and advanced technologies,’ added Olver.
Most popular
-
Is 3D cinema all it's cracked up to be?
-
EADS aircraft runs on algae biofuel
-
Brunel student creates missing link for cyclists
-
Forgemasters saga raises concerns over coalition business policy
-
Conservative donor 'tried to invest in Forgemasters'
-
Stealth overcoat hides military equipment
-
The Hayward Legacy
-
Cornell robot breaks walking distance record
-
Turbine to produce electricity from river or tidal streams
-
Qinetiq solar-powered aircraft set to break endurance record
Most commented
-
Is 3D cinema all it's cracked up to be?
-
The Hayward Legacy
-
Forgemasters saga raises concerns over coalition business policy
-
EADS aircraft runs on algae biofuel
-
Brunel student creates missing link for cyclists
-
Oil over troubled waters
-
Engineers must grab their share of the limelight
-
Ceramic plate speeds blood cleaning
-
Conservative donor 'tried to invest in Forgemasters'
-
Where's my jetpack?
Most emailed
-
EADS aircraft runs on algae biofuel
-
Projects aim to make the most of captured CO2
-
Qinetiq solar-powered aircraft set to break endurance record
-
Cornell robot breaks walking distance record
-
Contracts and Projects Tracker: Who's doing business and where
-
Brunel student creates missing link for cyclists
-
Turbine to produce electricity from river or tidal streams
-
Stealth overcoat hides military equipment
-
Willetts casts doubts over nanotechnology centres
-
Scientists develop nasal-based communication device






Readers' comments (1)
Anonymous | 12 Feb 2010 9:57 pm
I am not an engineer, nor do I work within any part of manufacturing but, like most Brits, wish to see UK engineering companies flourishing in the world markets again.
It is sad that BAE took a decision some years ago to permanently withdraw from the designing and building of commercial aircraft. Nevertheless, it is good to see that they have "kept their hand in" by using their expertise with the now defunct Avro RJ series to set up an operation, similar to the myriad of consultancies established within the privatised rail industry. If BAE can earn some extra pennies by giving technical assistance to overseas manufacturers, then it is all "grist to the mill."
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment