Advanced search

MoD to increase Chinook fleet

UK defence secretary Bob Ainsworth announced today that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) is to give a major boost to the military helicopter fleet with the provision of 22 new Chinook helicopters.

The first 10 new Chinooks will start to roll off the production line in 2012 and be completed in 2013, increasing air support on the front line in Afghanistan.

The Chinook fleet in total will increase in size from 48 to 70 airframes, which will include eight Mk3 Chinooks and replacements for two Chinooks lost on operations.

The announcement is part of a new Future Helicopter Strategy that will deliver a 40 per cent increase in the number of lift helicopters available for use on operations in extreme conditions, such as those in Afghanistan.

The new strategy will see the ageing Sea Kings, which the Royal Navy and RAF currently use, being taken out of service early. The navy’s future helicopter requirements will be met by a combination of the Merlin fleet and new Wildcats.

The army will also operate Wildcats alongside the Apache. It will mean that following the retirement of Puma from 2022, the UK’s military will operate four core helicopter fleets of Chinook, Apache, Wildcat and Merlin, with around 65-75 of each aircraft.

News of the strategy comes as a report published today by the National Audit Office (NAO) pours criticism on MoD programmes for being unaffordable.

The report warns that the MoD’s short-term approach of reducing equipment on some projects and taking the decision to cut others will lead to long-term deficit increases.

According to the NAO, in 2008-09 costs on 15 defence projects increased by £1.2bn with two thirds of this increase directly due to decisions to slow projects.

The MoD has also taken the decision to save £194m by reducing Lynx Wildcat numbers by 23 per cent, from 80 to 62 helicopters, cutting planned flying hours by a third.

The NAO claims that unless the MoD addresses the underlying budgetary and governance issues it will not consistently deliver value for money or the operational benefits.

Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, said: ‘The MoD has a multi-billion pound budgetary black hole that it is trying to fix with a “save now, pay later” approach.

‘This gives a misleadingly negative picture of how well some major projects in the MoD are managed, represents poor value for money and heightens the risk that the equipment our armed forces require will not be available when it is needed or in the quantities promised.’

Ian Godden, chairman of A|D|S, the UK’s AeroSpace, Defence and Security trade organisation, said: ‘More helicopters for our troops in Afghanistan are of course welcome - but as ever, we have to question at what cost this will be to the armed force’s future capability.

‘So often in the past we have seen programmes accelerated to provide vital services at the detriment to other programmes causing greater costs and loss of services, and there is a very real fear that this will result in the same.

‘Today’s announcement is like painting over the damp patches in your house, giving a superficial fix to a far deeper problem that will only re-emerge later and in a far worse condition.’

Readers' comments (2)

  • The MOD has in my opinion had this sort of problem even in the 1980's. Troops required equipment in the Falklands but were told that due to spending cuts they could not order essential supplies unless they were desperately needed. Of course, even with the air bridge, everything became desperate but due to similar thinking back in the UK these problems were not properly addressed. It seems that the MOD has to appease it's political masters to such an extent that troops and equipment take second place to the way the gov’t. wants to be seen in the short term, They do not seem to listen to senior forces officers who love to save money to make the Armed Forces into a viable proposition. Instead the little men in grey suits who never need to see an enemy face carry on making all the decisions that ultimately cost the UK much more.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yet again it seems our Government is ignoring the Country's own Manufacturing Industry and buying American made Chinooks. British-built Merlins are far superior aircraft and could have been in service much sooner. These Chinooks could be built at Agusta Westland who already have a licence. The Italians are building some at Agusta so why is British taxpayers' money being spent in the USA? This is madness when we need to protect our own Industry more than ever.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Current Issue

The Engineer 14 May 2012

Poll

Local authorities in Cumbria and Kent are discussing the possibility of deep-level nuclear waste repositories, where waste will be sealed into underground vaults for thousands of years. What are your feelings about this method of disposing of high- and intermediate-level nuclear waste?

Previous Poll

Will the government's proposed large infrastructure projects be sufficient to lift Britain out of a second recession?

Click here to see the results and comment.