Sunday, 12 February 2012
TE Masthead
Advanced search

Perth hosts 7kW VAWT prototype

Windworks Engineering has taken the wraps off a new Vertical Axis Wind Turbine and disclosed that it had erected a 7kW prototype at its testing facility north-east of Perth, Australia.

Windworks Engineering has taken the wraps off a new Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) and disclosed that it had erected a 7kW prototype at its testing facility north-east of Perth, Australia.

The 7kW design, with a wing height of 5.5m, will now be tested to evaluate its aerodynamic performance as well as stability, sound and vibration levels under various wind regimes. This will be followed by the trialling of a selection of permanent magnet generators.

The Windworks turbine, which has its main rotor-shaft arranged vertically, as opposed to horizontally, does not, like its Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT) cousins, need to be pointed into the wind to be effective. It also rotates at low speeds and hence emits little noise, an advantage on urban sites where wind direction is highly variable.

Despite their benefits in low-wind situations, VAWT turbines are not as efficient as their more common horizontal counterparts, a fact acknowledged by the engineers at Windworks Engineering. It admitted that while the efficiency of HAWTs in wind-tunnel testing may be as high as 45 per cent, a typical VAWT design may only achieve between 25-35 per cent efficiency.

However, it also claimed that efficiency of HAWTs in operation is significantly reduced due to inefficiencies resulting from the turbine not fully facing the wind at all times, as well as lengthy maintenance shutdowns. This, the German company said, causes the effective efficiency of the HAWTs to drop to about 25 per cent over their lifetime.

Windworks also added that its design will be considerably less expensive than a horizontal design to commission. That is because, while horizontal turbines require deep foundations, the vertical turbine can be built on much shallower foundations and can be erected without the need for cranes.

The Windworks VAWT, with a vertical-support column and three vertical, aerodynamic wings, sports a generator that sits low to ground level, minimising maintenance costs, as well as reducing the complexity of the foundations.

The new turbine is also said to eliminate problems that have arisen at many HAWT windfarms, where birds and bats have been known to fly into the spinning blades. Engineers at Windworks claim that because their design appears as a solid mass to wildlife, the design does not have the see-through effect common in HAWT designs and so birds and bats fly around it.

The turbine is silent too because there is no compression of air between the wings and the support column as with the HAWT. The Windworks VAWT is also smaller than a comparable HAWT and creates less shadow and visual impact.

Windworks does not plan to build or own a manufacturing facility to build the VAWT turbines. Contractors manufactured the prototype turbine in Australia and future manufacturing will be sourced and tendered from Asian companies under the supervision of Windworks. Agreement in principle has been reached with Siemens to build and supply the electric system for the turbines.

Windworks plans to develop turbines for domestic, commercial and industrial use ranging from 2.5kW to several MWs in capacity.

David Wilson



Readers' comments (5)

  • Windworks do not seem too keen to show many pictures of this turbine, but if it's the one in the picture on their home page then there's nothing new in its design; it's a Savonius drag type. While I am in favour of wind energy, this just seems to be more hokus pokus wind power engineering, and that we get too much of.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You are right and wrong, Windworks will not show to much detail because they can't commit to the design as of yet. But if you look closely at what has been supplied the design is not of the Savonius drag type, because the 3 blades are actually specifically designed aerofoils, and therefore operate due to the lift pricipal of aerodynamics.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can someone ( a competent engineer would do fine) please carry out a proper study on the real amount of energy developed by wind power versus the amount of energy consumed to put them up and operate them?
    This is not determining how many angels can stand on a pin, it's ordinary engineering to answer critical questions.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I just finished my 500 watt double rotor axial flux generator and planned to VAWT. Can anyone help me to build VAWT blade or wing to get 500 watt or more?

    Thank you.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • VAWTs could be the best method of harvesting wind energy. HAWTs are limited by stress factors to around the 7.5 mega watt level. The limit for VAWTs on the other hand is a massive 750 mega watts with lift technology using simple mechanical control of AOA for all wind speeds.
    They can have greater output per frontal area to the wind than HAWTs dependent on geometry.
    A 750 mega watt VAWT would be massive but takes up a fraction of the land area required for a HAWT farm of the same capacity.
    The slow moving airfoils on a big VAWT would not create noise or impact wildlife.
    A marine varient is could also harvest wave energy.
    Happy to explain how to interested parties subject to an NDA.
    gy.mercer@ntlworld.com

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Current Issue

Poll

How is the engineering and technology sector benefitting from a renewed focus on apprenticeships?

Previous Poll

Will the government's proposed large infrastructure projects be sufficient to lift Britain out of a second recession?

Click here to see the results and comment.