Tuesday, 02 September 2014
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

SABRE engine passes milestone tests

British engineers have successfully tested new engine technology that could pave the way for a high-speed orbital spaceplane.

The team from UK firm Reaction Engines announced this morning that the SABRE engine technology, which could power a reusable spaceplane known as Skylon capable of entering orbit without additional rockets, had been proven in tests evaluated by the European Space Agency (ESA).

Skylon2

Reaction Engines has been testing the SABRE heat exchanger and anti-frost system using a standard jet turbine engine

The company called the technology, which could also lead to supersonic flights from Europe to Australia in four hours, ‘the biggest breakthrough in aerospace propulsion since the invention of the jet engine’.

Reaction Engines’ CEO Tim Hayter said the SABRE engine, which utilises both jet turbine and rocket technology, would be made possible by the company’s innovative pre-cooler heat exchanger.

‘The heat exchanger is the thing that cools the air from 1000ºC to -150ºC in 1/100th of a second,’ he told a press conference. ‘This means that we can build a hybrid air-breathing rocket engine. This is going to permit orbital and high-speed propulsion.’

He added that as well creating the possibility for six to 15 times more space launches than are currently performed, the technology could improve the fuel burn of existing gas turbine technology by five to 10 per cent, leading to savings of an estimated $10bn to $20bn for the airline industry.

Other applications may also be possible, he said, including a 15 per cent efficiency improvement in multi-stage flash (MSF) desalination, which is typically used to create drinking water in many Middle Eastern countries.

The heat exchanger, which rapidly cools air so it can be compressed and fed into the rocket combustion chamber, is made possible by secret technology that prevents frost from forming and blocking the exchanger’s pipes.

With this in place, the exchanger can displace 400MW of heat energy with a weight of around 1.5 tonnes, less than one per cent of the weight of current technology.

Reaction Engines has also developed a way to manufacture the exchanger, which is formed from hundreds of millimetre-thick pipes arranged in a spiral formation, that involves checking it for sub-microscopic holes.

sabre

The Sabre engine, with its heat exchanger system in place

After successfully completing 141 tests with the engine and pre-cooler installation, the team plans to design the full SABRE engine and build a demonstration model, largely from existing gas turbine technology, as well as flight-testing the installation.

This is the latest development in the technology’s long history, which dates back to a Rolls-Royce/British Aerospace project in the 1980s that was shut down when the government withdrew funding but rescued by the engine’s designer Alan Bond, who founded Reaction Engines.

Bond said the company will also look at setting up a consortium to manufacture the engine and eventually develop Skylon. ‘Reaction Engines has never had ambitions to build all of that itself,’ he told the press conference, adding that the firm would look to work with the likes of Rolls-Royce, BAE Systems or Astrium.

skylon

The Skylon spaceplane is a single-stage-to-orbit design

Nigel McNair Scott, the company’s chairman and a major shareholder, said Reaction Engines would inevitably have to take a partner and were talking to a lot of people but that it was too early to consider takeover offers.

For more in-depth information on SABRE and Skylon, take a look at our recent Q&A with the Reaction Engines team.


Readers' comments (17)

  • I am a great follower of SABRE and Skylon. I have been following your progress for many years.
    Even through the British Government has not helped you much, please do your best to keep it British!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Brilliant news!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Brilliant news.

    I personally think they be better off going the Space X route and build everything themselves in house at a single factory, finance through licensing on it technology and private investors.

    Going the consortium route is very much old space an will only wast time and money in the long term. Government should finance the construction of a UK space port capable of support Reaction engine operations, even if it just use for polar launches and flying Skylons out to their customers.

    But at all costs let keep this, invented in Britain, built in Britain by British workers, and finance by British financiers employing British workers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Unfortunatey if it is a viable proposition with a chance of contributing to the nations finances. You can rest assured that the educated idiots who run this country will ensure it gets no financial support and ends up with the chinese

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fantastic
    this will be the only rational way to get into space for a reasonable cost-KEEP GOING

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Brilliant work by some very very Brilliant Engineers. As has been said, we simply have to keep this British. Properly funded this can be a huge success and proof that we really can do anything given the will to make it happen. Many of the team at REL have dedicated their lives to this project, they deserve nothing less than to see Skylon take to the sky and beyond using their fantastic engines with a big fat Union Jack on the side, all built in Britain by British Companies. A Great day indeed!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is it UKIP day in the Engineer (joke)? Yes brilliant work. I see no problem with partnering with other countries including the Chinese, the Indians and Brazilians. If I recall there are benefits from launching near the equator in many mission scenarios.

    Surely forms of licensing of the engine technology (a la ARM) are worth looking at, but maintaining a high level of investment in R&D is also needed. Many UK companies & banks need to take a risk & release some of their cash mountains to maintain momentum in this wonderfully ambitious project.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is brilliant. But what have the ESA got to do with it? Why are they always involved in our space projects?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ESA was involved in funding the proof-of-concept tests.

  • They also act as independent validators for the technology. Which is important as there relatively few people around that are capable of validating this technology and confirming whether it can do what the engineers claims it can.

    An for RE to get funding from the private sector they need more than just their own words to convince investors to get their check book out. Having organisations like ESA, Nasa supporting what you are telling the investors help immensely loosening that check book.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • congratulations ,Hope the whole engine components will withstand the heat of 1500degree celcius when travelling in mach2 above

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article