Advanced search

London firm will remove the high capital cost of solar technology

Solar electricity for all markets

A new London-based photovoltaics company is preparing the commercial roll-out of low-cost solar-energy technology, which could be integrated into off-grid applications.

Solar Press said this technology would boost under-developed regions by providing electricity to billions of people who do not have access to or that currently lack this utility.

The current obstacle that stands in the way of expanding solar energy to these communities is the high capital cost of installing and producing photovoltaic power, using currently available technologies.

Omar Cheema, founder and chief executive of Solar Press, said his engineering team overcame this obstacle with a photovoltaic module and processing techniques that make solar electricity products affordable in all markets.

Its module design incorporates a polymer semiconductor and soluble small-molecule semiconductor and does not use rare earth materials, which most silicon-based solar modules do, he said. Also, unlike silicon-based alternatives, the Solar Press cells do not require clean room or vacuum environments and can be manufactured through printing machines in ambient conditions.

Cheema said his team has achieved a throughput of 10,000 to 100,000m2 an hour.

’The amount we can produce in an hour is as much as you could produce with silicon solar cells in a year,’ he said.

Cheema said that this will lead to a significant reduction in costs and will allow Solar Press to sell its solar cells for a fraction of the price of current technology. He also said that the efficiency of Solar Press’s modules is comparable to those based on amorphous silicon.

Solar Press has received funding and support from the Carbon Trust, a not-for-profit company set up by the government to accelerate the move to a low-carbon economy.

 

Readers' comments (3)

  • I know the article says London based, but will these cells be made in the UK?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A high volume PV module production system as described sounds attractive, but the lack of any information makes the story pretty ridiculous. What sort of conversion efficiencies and stabilities are we talking about? It says "similar to amorphous Si" (ie maybe between 1 and 4 % aka useless apart from little lamps to stick in the garden) - meaning if you can cover a few acres, you may be able to run a few more light bulbs, given a decent sized battery.

    This must have been written by some painfully ignorant marketing person as there are no serious, non-concentrator volume production PV systems that "unlike silicon-based alternatives, ... require clean room or vacuum environments" or "use rare earth materials, which most silicon-based solar modules do, he said". Maybe he was getting mixed up with high performance magnets?

    It could be an interesting technology if the article actually said something useful about it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No cost vs output figures given. Are we down to the magic $1 per watt installed yet?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Current Issue

The Engineer 14 May 2012

Poll

Local authorities in Cumbria and Kent are discussing the possibility of deep-level nuclear waste repositories, where waste will be sealed into underground vaults for thousands of years. What are your feelings about this method of disposing of high- and intermediate-level nuclear waste?

Previous Poll

Will the government's proposed large infrastructure projects be sufficient to lift Britain out of a second recession?

Click here to see the results and comment.