Advanced search

Replacement patrol vehicle has detachable parts to deflect explosives

Supacat launches Snatch substitute

Armoured-vehicle manufacturer, Supacat, has unveiled its contender to replace the controversial Snatch Land Rover for the Ministry of Defence (MoD).

Developed in 1992 as patrol vehicles for use in Northern Ireland, Snatch Land Rovers have since been used in Afghanistan.
However, they were subject to criticism when a number of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) exceeded the level of protection offered, leading to soldier fatalities.

Supacat’s SPV400 has been designed in response to these concerns. Jim McKechnie, project engineer for the SPV400, said that building the 7.5-tonne vehicle from scratch allowed a higher level of mobility and protection.

’In the past there had been a tendency to start with a fast vehicle and then clad armour on. In the SPV400 we’re using the automotive chassis as the armour, so you don’t have to carry the extra weight penalty.’

The SPV400 has a V-shaped hull to provide mine-blast protection, with a separate composite crew pod. Additional protection is provided by the front and rear axles, which are mounted on detachable sub-frames to absorb and deflect a blast away from the crew pod.

Nick Ames, managing director of Supacat, said: ’With this design, what you’re going to avoid is the vehicle being picked up, flipped and turned. In the event of a blast, you’re actually going to see the front section come off. For me that is a relatively simple but, nevertheless, key advantage of this vehicle.’

The SPV400 will go up against the Ocelot, built by Force Protection and Ricardo, in the MoD’s Light Protected Patrol Vehicle (LPPV) programme to replace the Snatch Land Rover. A decision is expected to be announced by the end of the summer.

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • Approx 12 - 18 months ago I read a report on a similar vehicle built by Iveco in Italy & the MOD had approx 400 in storage pending a solution to a major communication problem ie the armour plating made it impossible to communicate with the crew via the latest MOD radio system, has this now been resolved, if so why are'nt the vehicles in use?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Current Issue

The Engineer 14 May 2012

Poll

Local authorities in Cumbria and Kent are discussing the possibility of deep-level nuclear waste repositories, where waste will be sealed into underground vaults for thousands of years. What are your feelings about this method of disposing of high- and intermediate-level nuclear waste?

Previous Poll

Will the government's proposed large infrastructure projects be sufficient to lift Britain out of a second recession?

Click here to see the results and comment.