UAV for nuclear scouting missions
Students at Virginia Tech are modifying a remote-controlled helicopter to fly autonomous missions over and around areas hit by a nuclear attack.
The helicopter’s main mission would be to help military investigators detect radiation levels, and map and photograph damage.
‘It’s for a worst-case scenario,’ said project leader Kevin Kochersberger, a research associate professor of mechanical engineering and director of the Virginia Tech Unmanned Systems Laboratory.
Kochersberger and his team re-engineered a remote-controlled Yamaha-built Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) RMAX helicopter to fly in fully autonomous mode.
They also created flight control software algorithms that will direct the helicopter to radioactive sources on its own accord. To carry out various missions, the researchers outfitted the helicopter with various ’plug-and-play payloads’ as the vehicle’s weight capacity is limited.
The payloads are easily loadable and unloadable boxes that fit under the helicopter’s main body, carrying devices that would detect radiation levels in the atmosphere and on the ground, and take video and still images of damage. Flight control software would allow the mission to be changed mid-flight.
One payload is a miniature robot on treads that can be launched via a tether wire from the helicopter to collect evidence. The helicopter would hover over the robot, and pull it back via the wire. A student team is building this robot, which will be able to perform ‘chunk’ sampling and vacuuming.
The robot is expected to easily manoeuvre any terrain, including expected bomb craters, as part of its investigation, said Michael Rose, a graduate student in mechanical engineering. The team also plans to make the robot waterproof.
The group also designed a downward-looking stereo camera system mounted to the helicopter, to image affected areas. The cameras would allow for computerised 3D terrain mapping of affected areas.
It is expected that the helicopter will have night-vision capabilities, and enhanced imaging technologies that improve vision through smoke and fog as the project progresses, Kochersberger said.
The project — already funded at $735,000 (£488,484) with an additional $650,000 allocated for 2010 — is overseen by the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency and spearheaded by the Department of Energy’s Savannah River National Laboratory.
Plans call for the helicopters to be mission-ready in three years.
Most popular
-
Bad business of biofuels
-
Combustion engine doubles thermal efficiency
-
'Unconventional' drilling could free trapped Chilean miners
-
Fuel-cell technology may increase CCS plant efficiencies
-
ICL project supplies solar power system to Rwandans
-
Aerobatic Cri-Cri plane completes initial flight
-
August's top ten engineering industry contract wins
-
Eye of the beholder
-
Shape-changing UAV supports maritime operations
-
TSB funds 'smart' energy meter projects
Most commented
Most emailed
-
Combustion engine doubles thermal efficiency
-
Fuel-cell technology may increase CCS plant efficiencies
-
Bad business of biofuels
-
Fast-forward fashion
-
F1 technology used to treat musculoskeletal conditions
-
Researchers expose BPA health risk
-
Offshore oil industry receives safety warning from HSE
-
Urea could enable PEM fuel cell commercialisation
-
Carnegie spin-out to develop robotic systems with NREC
-
Statoil looks to develop first floating offshore wind farm






Readers' comments (1)
Ashley Bryant | 5 Mar 2010 4:05 pm
Why is it that amidst the credit crunch the US can still invest in high-technology research programmes, when here in Europe we can't/don't?
Even if it were the case, the paperwork required to submit proposals is so overwhelming, that only those larger businesses that can absorb this type of overhead actually get the chance of securing funding.
I can't see how the UK is going to continue to be an economic power if we refuse to nurture high technology businesses from the SME sector, which after all represents at least 90% of the total number of UK based businesses.
If it were, then at least the chances of UK developed technology and UK high-technology jobs would have a greater chance of remaining in the UK, rather than when market conditions get touch, overseas owned businesses pull their R&D / manufacturing facilities from the UK and consolidate in their country of origin.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment