Friday, 24 May 2013
masthead+quote+image

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Mandatory All fields must be completed.

Headline

Government drops plan to buy F-35 for navy's aircraft carriers

Comment

Given the B has conducted well in excess of 100 ship borne take off and landings vs the C's 0 I'd go with the B because it almost means the two carriers will be commissioned. One in service and one at extended readiness for a continuous capability. EMALS smelt high, high risk that could have sunk carrier ops. Factually the B has a larger payload and range than a FA18 A/B because it does not have to have fuel reserves for aborted traps. What's more with rolling vertical landings the B can carry back ordinance and fuel. It is also a force multiplier given it can operate off USMC LHD's and LPH's as well as those of our allies. As for the French argument that was a chimera. The C was too heavy to launch let alone recover from the CDG. Ironically, the B can easily operate from the CDG. at last commonsese that will see s get the two carriers instead of one.

Posted date

11 May 2012

Posted time

8:52 pm

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Digital Edition

The Engineer May Digital Edition

Poll

Digital healthcare gives clinicians the ability to monitor patients in their homes, rather than in hospital. Will this create problems or opportunities?

Previous Poll

Forward-looking flying car specialist Terrafugia has unveiled a new autopilot-equipped STOVL concept which it says could be on sale in 8-12 years. But will the science-fiction staple of the flying car ever take off?

Read and comment on the results here

Advanced search