Saturday, 18 May 2013
masthead+quote+image

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.

Report comment to moderator

Mandatory All fields must be completed.

Headline

Last week's poll: What's the likely future for carbon capture and storage?

Comment

By the time carbon capture and storage technology is developed there will be little need for it. The combustion of fossil fuels is just a blip in the energy supply system. For a relatively short period it superseded renewable energy derived from windmills, wood burning, sails and horse power! Energy is now starting to be obtained by the electro-chemical conversion of renewable energy sources. As with any new technology, the cost of fuel cells is coming down as technical maturity and economies of scale are reached. Instead of digging up more carbon and storing it for hundreds of thousands of years, why not recycle that which we already have? Engineers have developed successful prototypes which extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and synthesise it with hydrogen to form gaseous or liquid fuels. With fuel cells, the overall efficiency could be greater than at present without adding to atmospheric carbon dioxide. Alkaline Fuel Cells reach 60 to 70 % efficiency with increased hydrogen obtained by water shift reactors, while Solid Oxide fuel cells can top 80% at high temperatures. Britain should be doing more to support the engineers developing innovative technologies for the new clean energy markets opening up globally.

Posted date

15 Aug 2012

Posted time

1:12 pm

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Digital Edition

The Engineer May Digital Edition

Poll

Forward-looking flying car specialist Terrafugia has unveiled a new autopilot-equipped STOVL concept which it says could be on sale in 8-12 years. But will the science-fiction staple of the flying car ever take off?

Previous Poll

NASA chief Charles Bolden says that the agency is moving forwards with plans for a manned Mars mission, but there are significant ‘technology gaps’. Which of these is likely to be the most difficult to overcome?

Read and comment on the results here

Advanced search