Advanced search

Structural batteries could offer support to soldiers on front line

Scientists at BAE Systems have demonstrated a method of storing electricity that could have initial applications on the battlefield.

The so-called structural batteries are designed to lighten the load of soldiers carrying rucksacks, which can typically weigh more than 71kg and be filled with numerous electrical items, but have also been demonstrated in an electric racing car.

BAE Systems claims that the patented structural batteries store the electrical energy within the physical structure of devices and help to reduce or eliminate the need for traditional batteries, which create weight and bulk as well as the burden and cost of carrying spares.

The materials were designed to help create smaller, cheaper military platforms and equipment to meet future demands, said Stewart Penney, commercialisation manager at BAE’s Advanced Technology Centre.

’We’ve been looking at a range of technologies that would deliver multi-functional materials and this work has spun out of that,’ he told The Engineer.

’The reason for doing it is to basically improve the efficiency of platforms. If you look at some of the requirements for military platforms in 10, 15, 25 years, to deliver that type of capability you need to go about doing it in a slightly different way.’

According to the defence company, the benefits for the defence sector have already been demonstrated in a micro unmanned air vehicle and a rudimentary torch. These have subsequently gained the interest of the UK Ministry of Defence as a demonstration of the obvious advantages for the UK armed forces.

To demonstrate the technology’s application beyond the battlefield, BAE Systems has also applied the technology through a partnership with race car manufacturer Lola. The Lola-Drayson B12/69EV 850hp Le Mans Prototype car incorporate structural batteries to power some of the on-board electronic systems. Lola-Drayson hope the vehicle will be the world’s fastest electric racing car.

Alex Parfitt, capability technology leader for materials at BAE Systems, said: ‘Structural batteries can be used in virtually anything that requires electricity, from small gadgets to entire vehicles. It can not only support our soldiers on the front line but also revolutionise technology in the consumer market by allowing more efficient, elegant and lighter designs.’

To develop this technology, scientists at BAE Systems are said to have merged battery chemistries into composite materials that can be moulded into complex 3D shapes, thus forming the structure of the device itself. It can then be plugged in when it needs recharging or utilise renewable power sources, such as solar energy.

The process makes use of nickel-based battery chemistries, which are commonly used in defence technology, and future developments will enable the integration of lithium-ion and lithium-polymer chemistries found in consumer electronic products such as mobile phones, MP3 players, laptops, tablets and portable games. This will not only lead to improved product designs but — eliminating the need to buy batteries — will reduce the lifetime cost to the consumer, as well as having environmental benefits.

Current development has demonstrated the ability to store useful energy in composites such as carbon fibre and glass-reinforced plastic, but in the future it could also be incorporated into fabric for a wide range of lightweight applications, from tents with their own power supply to making electric blankets a literal reality.

Readers' comments (2)

  • We are a PR firm in NY and saw the article on structural batteries and just wanted to pass on some information on some new battery technology for soldiers.

    The battery business has applications in communications equipment, UAVs, submarines, satellites, and thermal imaging equipment. Recently, the Company’s Soldier Worn Integrated Power Equipment System (SWIPES) was named one of the Army’s Greatest Inventions: http://www.efbpower.com/index.php/swipes/.

    http://www.efbpower.com/images/stories/swipes/sw_soldier2.jpg

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm not sure I understand this.
    The weight of the batteries has not been eliminated or reduced just built into the fabric of the device. A small saving in weight may be made as the battery does not require its own packaging. However, incorporating this means the user is locked in (even more deeply than Apple MacAir?) to the supplier and has no chance for after market equivalents?
    Is this change indicating that henceforth batteries are not to be considered 'consumable' or 'replaceable' items?
    The idea is 'patented' but I'm sure I've seen prior art for this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Current Issue

The Engineer 14 May 2012

Poll

Local authorities in Cumbria and Kent are discussing the possibility of deep-level nuclear waste repositories, where waste will be sealed into underground vaults for thousands of years. What are your feelings about this method of disposing of high- and intermediate-level nuclear waste?

Previous Poll

Will the government's proposed large infrastructure projects be sufficient to lift Britain out of a second recession?

Click here to see the results and comment.