Waste light captured from a mobile could charge its battery
Researchers are aiming to extend mobile phone battery life by capturing waste light from the screen and converting it into electricity.
A team from Cambridge University hopes to capture energy from organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) inside a phone by using thin-film photovoltaic (PV) cells built into the screen.
Prof Arokia Nathan, project leader and fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), told The Engineer that only 30–40 per cent of light generated by OLEDs is projected out of the front of the average mobile phone screen, with much of it being lost through the edges of the OLED.
Nathan and his collaborators at Canadian company IGNIS Innovation have created a proof-of-concept device that can harness this wasted light using PV cells around the edges of the display.
‘Once we have captured the light in the solar cell, that generates an output. It’s not very high but it’s something useful nevertheless,’ said Nathan.
The team, which was first based at the London Centre for Nanotechnology at University College London, believes that the captured photons could be used to help charge the phone and, because the technology can capture ambient light as well, it could one day lead to a phone that never has to be plugged in.
With current technology, the solar cells could generate up to 5mW for a typical 3.7in (9.4cm) smartphone screen, according to team researcher Arman Ahnood.
The electricity generated by the solar cell is used to charge up a supercapacitor, which in turn is discharged into a battery. The supercapacitor is used because charging the battery directly would involve implementing complex circuitry.
‘The amount of electrical power that the capacitors are able to store depends on how they are implemented,’ said Ahnood.
According to Ahnood, the thin-film capacitors, fabricated at Cambridge University, store charge for a period that is long enough for the battery to consume it.
Nathan explained the next step is to seamlessly integrate the technology and look at how efficient the whole system will be when it is used in a working mobile phone.
The team is also exploring different circuit designs and other materials in order to improve the energy-harvesting system’s efficiency.
Ahnood added: ‘We are looking at other ways to scavenge as much energy as possible, such as through vibrations and even human movement.’







Readers' comments (6)
Andy H | 25 Jan 2012 12:16 pm
Wouldn't it be more efficient to change the screen so the light isn't lost in the first place? Or at least less of it is lost.
Given that PV's are typically 15-20% efficient.
The gains are not going to be that significant.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Tim Perry | 25 Jan 2012 4:30 pm
I'm not sure if I have the energy to comment on this...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Graham Field | 25 Jan 2012 10:52 pm
Andy H is quite right. The only way to harvest sufficient light energy would be by placing the screen in strong direct sunlight, and I doubt that most LCD screens would last all that long if you did! Given that most mobile phones seem to spend their time in pockets or handbags, some sort of motion generator, akin to that used in some wristwatches, might be a better route to investigate.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Stephen Mosley | 26 Jan 2012 1:52 pm
I must admit my first thought was:
Waste in system identified - make system more efficient cutting cost and increasing life.
rather than:
Waste in system identified - create new system with additional parts to harvest waste and reintroduce it to system even though the laws of physics tell me that I'm going to lose some of it in this process anyway.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 27 Jan 2012 4:21 am
A mobile with solar charger (charge the mobile weekly once in the sun) would be a better option.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Krish Sound | 28 Jan 2012 3:04 am
I agree with all the above readers comments. Also this is similar to Prof. Yang Yang's research at University of California Los Angles (UCLA). The efficiency of the LCD Polarisers could be tackled first (root cause) then further improvements can be attempted.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment