New report recommends the continuation of fracking in UK
A new report has given the green light for the UK to continue with fracking, a method of extracting natural gas that is mired in controversy.
Fracking involves drilling a well up to 2km deep and pumping high-pressure water, sand and chemicals into shale rock in order to release methane gas.
The government-commissioned independent report suggests that fracking shale should be expanded across Britain, despite concluding that fracking was responsible for earthquakes that occurred in Blackpool last year.
The report — written by Peter Styles, professor of applied and environmental geophysics at Keele University; Brian Baptie of the British Geological Survey (BGS); and Christoper Green, an independent fracking expert — found Cuadrilla Resource’s fracking activities near Blackpool caused two minor tremors of magnitudes 2.3 and 1.5 in spring last year after the company attempted to extract methane from Lancashire shale.
‘There’s no record of a quake at this size doing any structural damage,’ said Styles. ‘But they would be strongly felt, and there is a possibility of superficial damage.’
Cuadrilla terminated fracking at its Preese Hall site after the earthquakes were felt at the surface. However, British earthquakes of magnitude 3 have been generated for decades as a result of coal mining and still take place regularly without impact.
The report, which will now go out for a six-week consultation, claims that fracking should go ahead in Britain providing it is carried out under what would be some of the strictest guidelines in the world. Specifically, the report recommends four precautions that should be taken at Cuadrilla’s Preese Hall site and other projects in Bowland Shale. They are:
- Hydraulic fracturing should include a smaller pre-injection and monitoring stage before the main injection;
- Hydraulic fracture growth and direction should be monitored during future treatments;
- Operations should monitor seismic activity in real time; and
- Operations should be halted and remedial action instituted, if events of magnitude 0.5ML or above are detected.
The expert panel believes fracking at the Blackpool site will probably lead to more quakes but they will be too small to cause structural damage above ground.
Mark Miller, Cuadrilla’s chief executive, said: ‘We are pleased that the experts have come to a clear conclusion that it is safe to allow us to resume hydraulic fracturing, following the procedures outlined in the review.’
He said the company is already amending its procedures in light of the suggestions put forward by the experts.
David MacKay, chief scientific adviser to the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), said: ‘If shale gas is to be part of the UK’s energy mix, we need to have a good understanding of its potential environmental impacts and what can be done to mitigate those impacts.
‘This comprehensive independent expert review of Cuadrilla’s evidence suggests a set of robust measures to make sure future seismic risks are minimised — not just at this location but at any other potential sites across the UK.’
As well as earthquakes, shale gas has been linked to ground-water contamination and air pollution — particularly in the US, where it now accounts for almost 30 per cent of total US natural gas production.
While the exact amount of shale gas in Britain is not known, it is being pursued by energy companies and potentially — in light of this report — the British government.
Last year, Cuadrilla estimated that 200 trillion cubic feet of shale gas lies beneath the Lancashire region alone. According to the Wall Street Journal, this would be enough to meet UK gas demand for 64 years. However, BGS estimated that the reserves contain only 4.7 trillion cubic feet of shale gas — one 40th of the amount calculated by Cuadrilla.





Readers' comments (5)
Martin Bove | 18 Apr 2012 1:42 pm
We should be investing in renewable energies not more fossil fuels which are causing climate change. Fracking has caused serious problems in the USA and Canada, with methane coming out of peoples' water taps and pollution to aquifers from the chemicals used !
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Chris P | 19 Apr 2012 5:18 am
The other issue that has come up is that a good percentage of the methane leaks and causes problems with ozone in the vicinity of the wells. It is also a really bad gas for global warming. There are problems with the disposal of fracking fluids and the trucks that take away the residual fluids.
It would be much better to insulate houses.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Peter Doodes | 19 Apr 2012 9:01 am
"British earthquakes of magnitude 3 have been generated for decades as a result of coal mining". In no way Caudrilla does this statement give the green light to Fracking. Coal mining does not depend on forcing chemicals deep underground to pollute the water supply. The earthquakes directly caused by Fracking in the Blackpool area occurred in an area not known for seismic problems! Caudrilla admits that earthquakes will continue saying that "they are not likely to cause any "significant" damage. As a friend wrote to me "I suppose we are expected to swallow that mollification ..along with the chemicals they intend to force down there too.. with NO POSSIBLE WAY to control which rivers/aquifers they get to when they migrate along fault lines. Good point Vanessa
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Rosie | 19 Apr 2012 12:36 pm
I suppose the fact that everyday life will be rendered intolerable for the many people who will live in the vicinity of these sites is of no importance at all to those who are blinded by greed. And what heritage are we passing on to our grandchildren?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
steve | 3 May 2012 4:30 pm
With the utmost respect, as I understand, this process is banned in France and Bulgaria, mostly because the public are not comfortable with this. Surely it seems foolhardy to continue with this form of exploration as it is proven to cause earthquakes. Surely we are not that absent minded or greedy? Please, for the sake of the people and the good of the land, desist.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment