Wednesday, 22 May 2013
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Photovoltaic system could offset diesel power generation

A low-cost and readily deployable concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) system could offset diesel power generation in remote locations.

Toronto-based Morgan Solar is currently finalising the design of its CPV cell before ramping up to full commercial production.

The device is a thin circular sheet of PMMA [poly(methyl methacrylate)] plastic some 30cm in diameter with a specially etched optical pattern that focuses light onto a tiny 5 x 5mm PV cell housed on an electronics chip.

The cell is a multi-junction type made from germanium gallium arsenide, with an efficiency between of 39–42 per cent, which compares with 15–17 per cent for standard crystalline silicon PV.

‘The light streams in through the optic and is concentrated onto a surface on the inside where it is then fired through a small injection point in a light guide — so that all the light coming in never escapes,’ said company vice-president Nicolas Morgan. ‘The property we’re taking advantage of is called total internal reflection and it’s the same property that keeps light inside a fibre-optic system.’

Multiple individual cells are arranged in panels are placed at each corner of a rectangular aluminum frame. This quad unit can be deployed in as little as 30 minutes, making it suitable for supplementing diesel generators in remote locations.

Indeed, the idea for the technology came when one of Morgan’s engineers was working for Doctors Without Borders in the Congo.

‘There will be colonies on the moon before there is grid connection to Shabunda [territory]; it’s sad but that’s the truth,’ said Morgan. He added: ‘The entire Cayman Islands are run off diesel — it’s insane.’

The company believes it can replace up to 40 per cent of diesel generation and could therefore find a market in places such as India, where some 10–20 per cent of power generation is off-grid diesel.

Readers' comments (2)

  • Although CPV is with high cell efficiency, silicon PV panel with lower cell efficiency is much cheaper than CPV. PVinsights, http://pvinsights.com/ , indicated that CPV is too expensive to be massive produced in the future.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @PVinsights: If the link provided comparison CPV data it would be helpful but it doesn't compare. Or is this data you charge for so we must pay to see you are correct? Should we just trust you? A potential 40% efficiency (from the article) is huge and implies the entire cost structure changes. My only reason for pause/pushback is the claim "silicon much cheaper" seems rather dismissive without data everyone can look at for explanation. kyle sager heliocurrent.com

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Digital Edition

The Engineer May Digital Edition

Poll

Digital healthcare gives clinicians the ability to monitor patients in their homes, rather than in hospital. Will this create problems or opportunities?

Previous Poll

Forward-looking flying car specialist Terrafugia has unveiled a new autopilot-equipped STOVL concept which it says could be on sale in 8-12 years. But will the science-fiction staple of the flying car ever take off?

Read and comment on the results here