Wednesday, 27 August 2014
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Scottish government approves world's largest tidal power scheme

The Scottish government has approved plans for a 10MW tidal power array on Scotland’s West coast, which when completed will be the largest of its kind in the world.

ScottishPower Renewables (SPR) will install ten tidal turbines, each capable of producing 1MW of electricity, off the Sound of Islay. The project will use HS1000 tidal turbines developed by Hammerfest Strøm, a company partly-owned owned by Iberdrola (SPR’s parent company).

The array will generate enough electricity for over 5000 homes – more than double the amount needed to power the island. SPR is currently constructing the first HS1000 device that will go into testing in waters off Orkney later this year.

‘The testing of the HS1000 machine in Orkney this year will help us to finalise our timetable for the demonstration project in Islay, but we will begin work on the project in 2012 and plan to have machines installed as early as feasible during the period 2013 to 2015,’ said Keith Anderson, chief executive of SPR.

The HS1000 device is based on a 300kW prototype, which has been installed in Kvalsundet in Norway for the last six years. The prototype device was the first turbine in the world to convert kinetic energy in tidal waters to electricity and deliver to the grid in 2004.

The Sound of Islay is a channel of water that separates the islands of Jura and Islay on Scotland’s west coast, and was chosen by SPR following a UK-wide search to find the best site for a demonstration project. The Sound of Islay benefits from strong tidal flows, shelter from storms and waves and has available grid capacity.

’Tidal power has long been considered as one of Scotland’s most valuable renewable energy resources and we have discussed its potential for many years. It is a first in terms of Marine Scotland approval for a tidal project in Scotland, and also a world first for an array of tidal power machines,’ Anderson said.

The Sound of Islay project will cost an estimated £40 million, covering manufacture, transport, testing and installation costs in addition to ongoing maintenance and infrastructure.

Scottish businesses have secured £4 million worth of contracts to make the turbines to be used in the development, with the largest contract going to Fife-based Burntisland Fabrication (BiFab).

Scottish Power Renewables also has preliminary plans for a 95 turbine tidal project at Ness of Duncansbay in the Pentland Firth which it has submitted to the £10 million Saltire Prize for marine energy innovation.


Readers' comments (14)

  • Coincidentally on the other side of the world in New Zealand, Conservation Minister Kate Wilkinson has signed off the 200MW (200 turbines) tidal power station at Kaipara Harbour.

    Astute readers will notice this is 20 times as large as the Scottish one.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm a bit concerned about the impact of the Scottish schemes on whales and dolphins.
    This week we heard of a St Andrews study which said the disturbance from offshore windfarms would lead to more beached whales.
    For one of the symbols of environmentalism to suffer this way would be most ironic.

    Now, New Zealand is noted for its whales and doplhins, though maybe less so in the Kaipara, but what about our large sea mammals there too?

    I note the Jura scheme is backed by the World Wildlife Fund, but have they now chosen to put carbon reduction before whales?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nowadays every project, to be approved, has to present an environmental impact assessment report, preformed by an indipendent certified body (e.g. CEFAS, see here http://www.cefas.co.uk/).
    Therefore:
    1) these risks should have been assessed
    2) if the project is publicly funded, these reports should be available on request

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So, it costs an estimated £40M with £4M in reciprocal trade, that means a £36M negative impact on balance of trade. I cannot remember all the Uk paid initiatives for development a trial in Scotland (staffa?), some trials in Devon, and some in the Humber. So, to sumarise my disappointment; we have spent a ridiculous amount of money on academic research, studies, trials etc - then we buy on from another country giving a double impact on our groaning economy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If the presence of whales and dolphins can be detected, eg by listening to their songs, perhaps some sonic alarms could be activated to keep them at a safe distance. Given the distance that sound propagates through water, I imagine something quite low power would be needed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is good news. However it is nowhere the energy available from the Severn barrage. We really need this and it will never be as cheap again.Tidal turbines are good if the conditions are unsuitable for barrages.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • THEN there is the Australian wave energy project run by Carnegie Energy - very exciting! Carnegie Wave Energy Limited (ASX:CWE) is focused on developing and commercialising its 100% owned CETO wave energy technology which is capable of producing zero-emission power and direct desalinated water.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The barrage could also provide a road link between South Wales and the Devonshire/Cornish peninsular

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fully support Eur. Ing. Graeme Vanner. Make it lagoon/pond based and you can extend the generation over a longer period and diminish environmental impact. The swishing of the Turbine should be alarm enough alarm for Dolphins and other large sea mammals?
    Barrage, water flow and tidal power generators can be effectively deployed in many communities around the coast and will bring employment with it....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'tonyw' (first blog) has it 'spot-on'..... not 'the largest of its kind in the world' at all. The Engineer's editors should check basic facts/claims independently instead of simply mindlessly 'parrotting' unjustified P.R. fed to them by developers/OEM's, trade associations, the government etc. And what a pity it's not by a British OEM, when DECC are trying to claim we're 'world leaders' at this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article