Monday, 20 May 2013
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Team reveals breakthrough in chemical catalyst development

Minnesota University engineering researchers are leading an international team that has made a breakthrough in developing a catalyst used during chemical reactions in the production of chemicals such as petrol.

‘The impact of this new discovery is enormous,’ said the team’s lead researcher Michael Tsapatsis, a chemical engineering and materials science professor in the university’s College of Science and Engineering. ‘Every drop of gasoline we use needs a catalyst to change the oil molecules into usable gasoline during the refining process.’

According to a statement, the research improves efficiencies by giving molecules fast access to the catalysts where the chemical reactions occur.

The research team built the prototype of the new catalyst using highly optimised ultra-thin zeolite nanosheets. They used a unique process to encourage growth of these nanosheets at 90º angles. The arrangement of the nanosheets makes the catalyst faster, more selective and more stable, but can be made at the same cost (or possibly cheaper) than traditional catalysts.

With faster catalysts available at no extra cost to the producer, production per manufacturing dollar will increase. With a higher output, it is conceivable that consumer costs will drop.

This new discovery is said to build upon previous discoveries at Minnesota University of ultra-thin zeolite nanosheets used as specialised molecular sieves for the production of renewable and fossil-based fuels and chemicals.

These discoveries, licensed by start-up company Argilex Technologies, are key components of the company’s materials-based platform. The development of the new catalyst is complete, and the material is ready for customer testing.

‘This breakthrough can have a major impact on both the conversion of natural gas to higher-value chemicals and fuels and on bio and petroleum refiners,’ said Cesar Gonzalez, chief executive officer of Argilex Technologies.

‘Using catalysts made by this novel approach, refiners will be able to obtain a higher yield of desirable products such as gasoline, diesel, ethylene and propylene. At Argilex, we envision this catalyst technology platform to become a key contributor to the efficient use of natural resources and improved economics of the world’s largest industries.’

The research, carried out in conjunction with researchers from institutions in Tokyo, Abu Dhabi, Korea and Sweden, is to be published in the 29 June 2012 issue of Science.

Readers' comments (3)

  • "consumer costs will drop"

    Err... Refinery capacity will increase where there's already overcapacity in the market.

    Will closing Coryton result in lower fuel prices?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's really about making refining more efficient. This could give refiners a bigger technologicial edge, improving margins and allowing U.S. refiners to export refined products which improves the trade defecit.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fuel prices will drop if we use less fuel. This catalyst will not reduce fuel prices, but then we shouldn't want lower fuel prices anyway. How would the driver be encouraged into a more efficient car if not by fuel prices.
    The US trade deficit would be improved by switching to more efficient cars and use of cars and other transport systems.
    The catalyst system, if it works will be licenced to future refinery operators anyway, I don't see why anyone would replace an existing refinery.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Digital Edition

The Engineer May Digital Edition

Poll

Forward-looking flying car specialist Terrafugia has unveiled a new autopilot-equipped STOVL concept which it says could be on sale in 8-12 years. But will the science-fiction staple of the flying car ever take off?

Previous Poll

NASA chief Charles Bolden says that the agency is moving forwards with plans for a manned Mars mission, but there are significant ‘technology gaps’. Which of these is likely to be the most difficult to overcome?

Read and comment on the results here