Biodiesel production method could reduce fuel's drawbacks
Share
A new method of producing biodiesel from microalgae aims to overcome some of the previous drawbacks of the fuel.
Using a novel catalyst, the researchers at the Technical University of Munich were able to produce saturated hydrocarbons suitable for use as high-grade fuels in vehicles.
For the production of biofuels, microalgae are an interesting alternative to conventional oil-containing crops such as soybean and rapeseed.
‘They grow significantly faster than land-based biomass, have a high triglyceride content and, unlike the terrestrial cultivation of oilseed plants, their use for fuel production does not compete with food production,’ said project lead Johannes Lercher of Munich.
Previously known methods for refining oil from microalgae suffer from various disadvantages. The resulting fuel either has too high an oxygen content and poor flow at low temperatures, or a sulphur-containing catalyst may contaminate the product. However, other catalysts are still not efficient enough.
The Munich scientists developed a new process, for which they have developed a novel catalyst: nickel on a porous support made of zeolite HBeta. They have used this to achieve the conversion of raw, untreated algae oil under mild conditions (260°C, 40-bar hydrogen pressure).
After an eight-hour reaction, the researchers obtain 78 per cent liquid alkanes with octadecane (C18) as the primary component. The main gas-phase side products are propane and methane.
‘The products are diesel-range saturated hydrocarbons that are suitable for use as high-grade fuels for vehicles,’ Lercher said.
Readers' comments (2)
Trevor Best | 12 Jan 2012 2:44 pm
This looks promising but_ using nickel and zeolite at 260c looks to be an expensive and non-climate change sympathetic method. Nickel has to be mined and transported, zeolight needs to be produced and the application of so much heat may produce the fuel but can it be called "Biogas" with the emphasis on friendly fuels?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Brian C | 12 Jan 2012 3:59 pm
The catalyst is as unoffensive as is chemically possible (not especially hazardous, no handling concerns). Catalysts are used at part per million concentrations, so the environmental impact is miniscule, not to mention the GHG from production and transport of the catalysts.
The largest resource costs are the 8 hour heating at 260C and water use for algae growth. However, even those fall in line with currently available methods.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment