Silent flight: Sikorsky's electric helicopter
An eco-friendly all-electric helicopter could one day change the face of urban transportation

Every good action film requires a helicopter chase scene. They usually feature a villain who hears a deafening noise before tentatively looking up to discover huge blades loudly churning the air overhead, blowing away trees and pedestrians. It’s a scene that has instilled the image of the helicopter in our minds. Noisy, powerful and versatile. A machine that only James Bond can elude.
But now a team at Sikorsky Innovation, the technology development arm of Sikorsky Aircraft, is attempting to turn that idea on its head by developing the world’s first all-electric, near-silent helicopter in a programme known as ’Project Firefly’. The team’s plan is to validate the benefits of the electric rotorcraft in flight while addressing some of the challenges of making an environmentally friendly helicopter both commercially and technically viable.
“If the trajectory continues as it is, the next five to 10 years are going to be interesting”
JONATHAN HARTMAN, PROJECT FIREFLY
’We’ve had electric cars, electric buses and electric street sweepers for a while now, but we really want to understand the unique difficulties associated with integrating electric propulsion into rotorcraft,’ said Jonathan Hartman, a programme manager for Project Firefly. ’In an ideal world, we would want an electric helicopter to compete on a one-to-one basis with your internal combustion aircraft today.’
Despite advances in electric powertrains for automotive applications, progress in aviation has been slow. The industry faces a very different set of challenges due to its high power requirements and Hartman believes that technology development has to begin now.

’You can either wait until your technology is fully commercially ready and then just integrate it into your product, or you can get out there ahead of time and start learning about all these issues that will come up during construction. That’s what we’re doing.’
The Firefly team has retrofitted a 50-year-old military S-300C design with an electric motor and digital controller, together weighing in at 180lb. Much of the S-300C’s original design has remained the same to keep costs down, with the main difference being the addition of an interactive LCD monitor in the cockpit. Two battery packs, each made up of 150 individual 45amp-hour (Ah) lithium-ion cells, are the backbone of the energy-storage system. They sit outside the aircraft much like an agricultural spraying kit, and run at 370V to provide enough power for a continuous 15-minute flight.
’That’s obviously not a lot of time,’ said Hartman. ’There is one technology that needs to mature to make this a commercial reality and that is energy-storage distribution. There are projects out there that we are watching. If some of the technologies that are on the bench now can come out and provide the energy-surge capacity they are claiming, we could well see helicopter endurances in the half hour to the hour range instead of just 15 minutes, which is exciting.’
Sikorsky claims it has increased the propulsion efficiency of the helicopter by around 300 per cent from baseline. The use of an electric motor reduces the complexity of the helicopter, cutting down on the number of components and reducing maintenance costs. There is also a reduction in vibrations and associated acoustics with electric propulsion, which could one day lead to a new series of low-observable, optionally manned aircraft for both military and civil applications.

The benefits, however, sit against a long list of challenges. The motor must be air cooled rather than liquid cooled, and has to remain at operating temperature while sitting on the ground. Sikorsky presented this problem to US Hybrid, which came up with an adaptation of a motor it uses for surface-vehicle programmes, such as the electric-powered Humvee for the US Marine Corps. The group provided 40 per cent more power and added a number of control laws to allow the motor to run at a constant high rpm.
While a conventional motor requires time to engage and build up torque, an electric motor can do this straight away so further control laws were added to prevent pilots from taking off and landing too quickly. Feedback from pilots also showed that the lack of noise could affect handling. ’Our toughest challenge was on the human factor side,’ said Hartman.’We have this electric helicopter that produces substantially less noise than a traditional helicopter. All of the pilot cueing is basically gone and that presents some unique difficulties that a pilot never had to worry about before.’
To address this, integrated sensors were added that feed real-time aircraft health information to the pilot through an interactive LCD monitor. Monitoring of health data is done automatically through the flight-control computer and any potentially hazardous conditions are avoided with automatic system re-routing or electric shutdown. As well as providing information to the pilot, the system tracks critical stages of flight in real time allowing the team to rapidly prototype new ideas as it goes through the development programme.
The issue that poses the greatest challenge, however, is weight. ’The helicopter itself weighs empty several hundred pounds more than it did in its legacy configuration,’ said Hartman. ’What we did in the project was take the maximum weight of the aircraft, subtract out the motor, the weight of the cockpit, control and the pilot and fill the rest of it up with batteries. They are not the most weight-efficient batteries that are on the market today, but we went for reliability over weight and selected safe components that we knew would work… If a bus loses charge that’s one thing, but if a helicopter suddenly loses charge then you have a problem.’

Hartman is confident that with improvements in battery technology, weight will be reduced and reliability improved significantly allowing electric helicopters to compete with conventional aircraft. Hartman added that in the shorter term electric helicopters could have some interesting applications using endurances of between half-an-hour and an hour. ’My director has a fantastic vision. He would love to see a helicopter fly on a two-seat tour of the Grand Canyon. You and the pilot, no shaking, you don’t even have to wear headphones - you just enjoy the view. You can imagine something similar for applications in urban transportation.’
The Firefly project is undergoing component bench testing and is scheduled to move to ground testing and first flight early next year. It seems inevitable that at some point full-scale electric rotorcraft will be seen in our skies, but just when that will happen is anyone’s guess. ’I would need a crystal ball to tell you,’ said Hartman. ’But if the trajectory continues as it is, the next five to 10 years are going to be very interesting.’
The specs
Airframe: converted S-300C
System efficiency: 89 per cent during cruise, 91 per cent maximum power efficiency
Power: 190hp permanent magnet electric motor
Endurance: 15min
Lithium-ion battery: 150, 45Ah lithium-ion cells
Maximum velocity: 79knots
View results 10 per page | 20 per page







Readers' comments (14)
Anonymous | 16 Nov 2010 11:19 am
great innovation - hopefully it will be built
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 18 Nov 2010 9:11 pm
Wow! This is a great test for EVs. I wonder if anyone is working on electric airplanes, autogiros or airships. An autogiro may be able to fly a longer trip than a helicopter with many similar advantages. The great surface area an airship might make it a good photo-electric air vehicle. In any case this article is right about the need for a greater enerergy dense storage system than lithium-ion batteries. That would benifit all EVs.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Bob Wallace | 19 Nov 2010 6:40 am
Move to exchangeable battery packs and this could be a good vehicle to move people from city-center to the airport.
Those people who are "important" enough to jump traffic....
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 19 Nov 2010 9:44 am
The "eco-friendliness" of this gadget depends on where the original energy came from and the efficiency of its transmission to the rotors. Even if the original power source is "eco-friendly"rather than fossil fuel, say solar or hydro-electric, the transmission losses will be irresponsibly wasteful. The low energy density of the battery back again creates an unnecessary power demand to keep it in the air compared with conventional fuels.
A case of greenwash I fear.
It will probably be used by the police to sneak up on and persecute motorists.
Interesting to play with it though...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 19 Nov 2010 1:26 pm
"The "eco-friendliness" of this gadget depends on where the original energy came from and the efficiency of its transmission to the rotors."
Even when the power comes from a mixed grid, with today's balance of coal, gas, renewable and nuclear EVs are considerably cleaner than all but the highest mileage gas vehicles. You need to live in a state where 100% of power comes from coal, and the alternative is a 50mpg gas auto for EVs to stop making sense.
Most cars today have power trains that are a little over 15% efficient at turning the energy in gasoline into wheel motion. That's abysmal. Almost all the energy is lost to waste heat, transmission friction and vibration. Newer cars have engines that are about 20% efficient, and the most efficient engines in the world are currently pushing 35% efficient.
By comparison, an electric power train is upwards of 80% efficient. Most lack a transmission altogether, permitting the engine to directly drive the wheels, and electric motors (especially brushless DC) are reliable, low maintinence and offer 100% torque from 0rpm.
>>Even if the original power source is "eco-friendly"rather than fossil fuel, say solar or hydro-electric, the transmission losses will be irresponsibly wasteful
Actually the average transmission loss in the US is 6.5%. You lose more in the process of charging the battery (10%) than you lose in transmission.
If you consider burning coal mined in your state in a powerplant in your state, which then sends electricity to your home (and car) in your state "irresponsibly wasteful", what about drilling for oil overseas or in the deep ocean, then shipping it via oil tanker (which burns filthy bunker oil) to shore, where it's refined into various petrol derivatives, then shipped by diesel truck to distribution centers, then finally shipped again to local gas stations?
Gas doesn't arrive at your local Shell station by magic, you know.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 20 Nov 2010 11:01 pm
They are showcasing the wrong technology. It's the battery that has always been the problem since the days of the Ancient Egyptians when they used them for electroplating. Fix that and it's a game changer for the entire transport industry.....how long do we have to wait?
BTW, with respect to the properties of LIon batteries, wouldn't a hard landing cause the battery pack to catch on fire which would be extremely difficult to extinguish?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 22 Nov 2010 9:56 pm
a preponderance of the sound actually comes from the tail rotor!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
David Mayer | 25 Nov 2010 1:34 pm
Does anyone remember Blue Thunder - a silent police helicopter
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Ron Gremban, calcars.org Technology Lead | 26 Nov 2010 3:52 am
"I wonder if anyone is working on electric airplanes, autogiros or airships." We are! Bye Energy, in association with Cessna, Jeppesen, and many other well-known aviation partners, is working on a production-oriented electric propulsion system for a C-172, the most popular general aviation aircraft ever. Check us out at http://www.byeenergy.com/pages/green-flight-main.html .
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Abdolazim Hasseli | 27 Nov 2010 5:45 am
The idea is great but limit of energy storage capacity of today's batteries is frightening!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment