Advanced search

UK engineer develops own life-saving implant

A serious heart problem inspired UK engineer Tal Golesworthy to develop a device that offers hope not just for himself but for thousands of other patients with the same condition.

In 2000, Tal Golesworthy, a process engineer from Tewkesbury, was told that the aortic root in his heart had expanded to 4.8cm and was in danger of splitting. He had two choices; undergo surgery to insert a mechanical valve or risk a sudden and fatal heart attack.

The first option filled him with almost as much dread as the second. The surgery would mean that he would be placed on Warfarin, a blood-thinning drug that carries the risk of severe bleeding. ’That’s not something I wanted to rely on for the rest of my life,’ said Golesworthy. ’The thought of that dismayed me more so than the surgery.’

open-heart surgery

Open-heart surgery is highly complex. The Bentall procedure takes about five hours and involves cutting the damaged section of the artery and removing the aortic valve

Golesworthy suffers from Marfan syndrome, an inherited disorder that affects the connective tissue of the body. It causes problems with many of the body’s systems including the spine, joints and eyes. But its effects are most serious in the aorta, the main arterial conduit from the heart, which may dilate and ultimately rupture.

Around 12,000 people in the UK are said to have the condition. In many cases, if their aorta appears to be dilating too quickly, they are offered a procedure known as Bentall surgery. This takes around five hours and involves a heart-lung bypass. The damaged section of the artery is cut out and the aortic valve is removed and replaced with a graft and a mechanical valve.

But Golesworthy thought he could engineer a better solution. What excited him was the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computer-aided design (CAD). He believed that by combining these technologies with rapid prototyping (RP) techniques he could manufacture a tailor-made support that would act as an internal bandage to keep his aorta in place.

The concept, he hoped, would reduce the risk of harmful clots forming due to the mechanical valve and importantly, eliminate the need to take Warfarin. Time was crucial and if Golesworthy was to save himself, he had to move fast to get the idea off the ground. In 2001, he enlisted the help of Prof Tom Treasure, a cardiothoracic surgeon at Guy’s Hospital, and Prof John Pepper, a surgeon from the Royal Brompton Hospital.

’It seemed to me to be pretty obvious that you could scan the heart structure, model it with a CAD routine, then use RP to create a former on which to manufacture a device,’ explained Golesworthy. ’In a sense, conceptually, it was very simple to do. Actually engineering that was significantly more complex.’

The process of developing a scanning protocol proved to be difficult as the movement of the heart complicated the images and made their positions unclear. The engineers, working alongside medical radiographers, found that they had different perspectives. ’They wanted pictures that showed the structures in a way that their colleagues could understand. What we wanted were images with which we could take dimensions,’ said Golesworthy.

Steady nerves

Steady nerves: in the traditional technique of aortic valve replacement surgery, all surgical sutures that will be holding the valve are in place and the new aortic valve is lowered into the patient’s aorta.

By scanning the heart at the same point in the cardiac cycle, the team was able to mitigate some of the dimensional inaccuracies. Once acquired, the information was used in a CAD process that would convert the data into a life-size replica of the aorta. A number of RP techniques were tested, including fuse deposition modelling and stereolithography, with the team finally opting for selected laser sintering (SLS).

’We realised fairly early that with RP we would not be able to produce the finished device, but that we should be able to produce a perfect 3D thermoplastic model of the aorta,’ said Golesworthy. ’The challenge then was to find a way of producing what was almost always going to be a textile implant to fit this model.’

The team looked at a number of different processes, such as 3D embroidery, but ended up using a standard medical polymer, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in a textile solution that allowed them to form a mesh directly onto the former. The mesh weighed less than 5g, was an exact fit for the ascending aorta and could be sutured into place by the surgeon. The process, from proposal to final product, took just under two years.

3D thermoplastic model

Above: the team used rapid prototyping to produce a perfect 3D thermoplastic model of the aorta and then set about developing a textile implant to fit it

’My aorta was dilating all through that period,’ said Golesworthy. ’When you’ve got the scalpel of Damocles hanging over your sternum, it motivates you into making things happen and so they do…to me it seemed like a ridiculously obvious solution. The only way to do this was with CAD and RP. It shouldn’t have taken an engineer to realise that, but it did.’

Golesworthy believes that projects such as this demonstrate that the interface between engineers and the rest of the world isn’t functioning in the way it should. ’When it does function, huge advances can be made in a very short time period, on very little money,’ he said. ’We have changed the world for people with aortic dilation and we have done it on a fraction of the cost.’

In May 2004, Golesworthy became the first recipient of his own invention after undergoing surgery at the Royal Brompton Hospital. Since then, 23 patients have successfully had the implant fitted and another seven are hoping to undergo the procedure. According to Golesworthy, the technique will soon replace the Bentall procedure and could be used to treat other heart conditions.

An implant is not the only option. One further area that could in the future prove beneficial to people with Marfan syndrome is tissue engineering. But Golesworthy is concerned that with tissue engineering, as with other areas in medicine, engineers are not getting as involved as they should be. He believes that the multi-disciplinary teams undertaking the research currently do not have the best skills base.

’They are all biologists and medics, and they need process engineers,’ he said. ’To tissue engineer an aorta and ascending valve outside of the body you have got to mimic the conditions in which they would normally grow. You need a bioreactor extraordinaire and that, really, is process engineering.’

With funding constraints likely to impact on healthcare research, the ability of engineers to work alongside biologists and chemists in the future will prove crucial. As Golesworthy proved, despite the millions being poured into medical research, sometimes it just takes an engineer to see the solution in areas where others have been unable to.

Early efforts at tailored aortic supports failed due to technology restrictions

Wrapping the aorta with artificial material isn’t a new idea. More than 20 years ago, US surgeon Francis Robicsek attempted to fashion an external, hand-tailored support for the aorta. The proposal was made before the widespread use of CAD, MRI and RP. Materials such as polypropylene, nylon and knitted Dacron were proposed, with Dacron being the most popular. However, attempting to accurately recreate the shape of the aorta using material cut during surgery proved extremely difficult and the technique never caught on. Instead, off-the-shelf composite valve conduits were offered as a more realistic solution. ’Technology has allowed us to revisit the idea,’ said Golesworthy. ’The aorta is such an extraordinary shape that you can’t possibly do it by a “taking a yoghurt pot I prepared earlier”. The only way was to bring scanning, CAD and RP together.’

Readers' comments (26)

  • Absolutely fantastic.
    Congratulations Tal.
    Its amazing what you can do today you couldn't do 20 years ago.
    Sounds like a start-up waiting to happen.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excellent outcome!
    Well done.

    I definitely think Engineers need to be more involved with the medical side of things.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is very good news. It shows when two different professions combine you can solve a lot of problems. Wonderfull

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tal had a great motivator, and those that have and will not have to undergo the Bentall procedure should be thankful.

    I think that in the past surgeons and other fields such as pilots had a much more mechnical outlook on life and this enabled them to think more practically and work with engineers more closely. Now engineering, as with surgery, is often more reliant on singlular techniques than broad outlook and problem solving.

    Well done the team !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Introduction of computer aided engineering applied to medicine: That's one small step for an engineer, one giant leap in medical history !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This has clearly been a great medical and engineering success. However, it begs the question why have there only been 23 operations in 7 years if there are 12,000 sufferers? I wonder if there is resistance from the medical establishment to an idea from 'without'. If so, this would be the main stumbling block to overcome in establishing multi-disciplinary solutions to medical problems.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I underwent the Bentall Graft Procedure in 1996. At that time it was the only option, it was successful and I was most grateful to Prof. Tom Treasure and the St. George's team.
    My brother and son, subsequently met Tal and Prof. John Pepper and were amongst the first to benefit from " Tal's Exostent ". Having talked to Tal and read up on the procedure I had no hesitation in encouraging ( nagging ) them to go for it. Fifteen years on, still on Warfarin and now afflicted by Atrial Fibrillation, oh how I wish Tal had waved his wand a little sooner. Well done Tal, Prof. Treasure, Prof. Pepper and all The Team !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Both inspirational and humbling in what it will achieve for patients and as landmark progress toward broadening medecine's awareness & acceptance of the potential of collaboration with non-medical creative expertise.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Congrats Tal! What a great example of applying an engineering solution to a problem.

    Although, isn't the idea of having engineers help solve problems in medicine what biomedical engineering is for? Granted biomedical engineering is still a fairly young field compared to other more traditional engineering disciplines, I'd say that the need for integration between engineering and medicine has long been recognized. The issue, thus I believe is whether biomedical engineering training programs are well developed/structured enough to generate capable professionals to meet those needs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is wonderful to read. This is speaking as a mother with a 3yo daughter who either has Marfan's (Our working diagnosis of the last two years) or the even rarer Beals.
    I wish there was more engineering solutions to help patients, especially in the area of scoliosis treatments. My little girl has a permanent heavy plaster / fibreglass jacket on 24/7. In the 21st century there has to be better options than this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Gwen, that sounds like an excellent use of this approach. Have you heard this interview with the CEO of Axial Biotech? FYI, my wife wore a brace for over 10 years, and is just fine today.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dean Kamen should give this guy a job.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hi I'm in Australia and don't have Marfan's but I do have an aorta that's grown to 50cm, any chance of bringing this system over here so my doc doesn't kill me?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I was diagnosed with an expanding aorta 2 years ago (not from Marfan's). The possible solution I was given if it continued to expand was surgery to insert a stent graft inside the aeorta to prevent it continued expansion. How is this any different ?
    my expansion has stopped so I'm not yet considering the surgery.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Obviously this is working, but I still would like to know if the supporting material expands and contracts with the same movement of the aorta? If so, does it lose its elasticity over time? If not, does it put pressure on the end points of the material? Thanks for a reply.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wonder if this kind of skunk works process would even be possible in the United States under our current regulatory and legal system.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "this demonstrates that the interface between engineers and the rest of the world isn’t functioning in the way it should."

    Yes yes yes. A small group of engineers in the company I work for has been pushing a solution to most of the really tough problems that my company is facing. Nobody believed it. The reasons stated: They knew the business and it won't work, or, It had been tried already and failed, etcetera. Well we finally found a champion and pushed it through and low and behold we now have lower costs, greater reliability, higher sales and more satisfied employees and customers. The nay sayers (almost everyone) are still bitter.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree that collaboration would be wonderful. However, here in the States, the FDA makes the new device approval process shockingly expensive and nearly impossible. Your device would probably cost up towards $500 million to bring to market.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yeah the medical process needs to be updated. But this happens in all fields. There has been research that has stated if you have a group of researchers or engineers you should have one person that knows absolutely nothing about the job to come into all the meetings and ask questions like why. Then it makes the researchers ask themselves why a lot of times while dumbing it down for someone they will notice that things they had assumed were needed are not thus simplifying the process. This would be awesome though if you needed a body part in the future you could ebay the schematics and use your 3d printer to churn one out.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GWEN - Have you seen the mesh and carbon filament "body armor" jackets for bicyclists? Something like that would resist the curvature and weigh far less.

    And - selective weakening of the muscles that are pulling the spine out of line with Botox has been done.

    iI don't have the references, but a search on PubMed for Botox and scoliosis might find something.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm a happily retired mechanical engineer. This story makes me want to go back to work. It shows the essence of engineering at its best. Thank you very much

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Look at all the failing implants being recalled. It's obvious properly trained and seasoned engineers of the proper disciplines were NOT involved. Lets hope Engineers rather than Lawyers make for a better outcome.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • it sometimes takes an "outsider" to see a solution.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Several thoughts:
    1. Mrs. Maloney, no one has replied to your question: 12,000 includes people who've already had the surgery or are not yet ready for it. Any surgery on a Marfan is risky. Although, if this procedure is what it's cracked up to be, it may actually be an early intervention solution.
    2. Am I correct in my understanding that this device goes *around* the aorta? (hence "exostent"?)
    3. Are they working on a version of this for the descending aorta?
    4. On the FDA: my daughter had a lensectomy a few years ago. The procedure is not recommended by the US NMF, but it has been done by non-Johns Hopkins affiliated Marfan ophthalmologists for decades very successfully.
    Anyway, there is a lens implant that has been successfully used in Europe on Marfan children but the FDA will not allow it. My daughter still can't see out of her right eye and won't be able to until she can get an implant.
    Her surgeon tried to make an appeal to the FDA unsuccessfully. My daughter's last check up was the first time I was in a doctor's office and the doctor brought his *lawyer* in! The lawyer was going over my daughter's file and making notes for his appeal to the FDA.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gosh the FDA is so dumb, I think its redundant! I think that in the information age we the people are a far better regulator of bad products. If a product doesn't work or makes you worse it would soon be all over the internet and that company would go out of business. Governments need to get out of the way

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As an engineer, I am delighted to see medics actually listening to Engineers. Barts Hospital in London employed a Design Engineer in about 1980 to design Orthopedic and nursing appliances. Clearly more hospitals should employ Engineers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say


Related images

Related videos

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article