Monday, 28 July 2014
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Holding out for a hero

Ask a member of the public to name a great British engineer and you’ll probably get one name: IK Brunel. Ask for a living person and you’re more likely to get a blank face. While pure science boasts multiple prominent figures leading debate in popular intellectual and media circles, engineering remains in the background, seen as functional, important but not particularly exciting.

brunel

Great, but not exactly current

The public perception and image of engineering was a key topic of debate at this week’s UK Manufacturing Summit at the IMechE. The institution’s chief exec, Stephen Tetlow pointed out that while many engineers know Britain is the world’s sixth largest manufacturing nation (or seventh, depending on your league table), all you hear in the pub is how we don’t make anything any more.

Business minister Mark Prisk highlighted the fact that 43 per cent of graduates have a STEM related degree but only five per cent go into manufacturing. Perhaps there isn’t so much a shortage of skills as of one of enthusiasm. The session’s conclusion was that we need a better supply chain of young people, grabbing their attention while still in primary school, and nurturing their interest through A levels, degrees and apprenticeships.

We’re still left with the well-worn question of how to get young people (and the population in general) more excited about engineering. And one of the more interesting ideas of the day was a call for a TV show promoting the sector. Given the wealth of activity and innovation that goes on in Britain alone, this stuck me as a genuinely interesting proposition that really could work.

There are countless projects that could capture the imagination of the public. As a journalist for The Engineer, I frequently find myself explaining stories I’ve covered to friends who have no technical background but are fascinated nonetheless. (There’s always the possibility they’re just humouring me but my friends are generally pretty ruthless).

An engineering TV programme could reveal to the public how much manufacturing work still goes on here, and highlight the need to preserve and build the sector. Factory floor visits wouldn’t make for thrilling viewing, true, but testing the latest engine prototypes or seeing spacecraft with British-made components in action would get people tuning in.

Modern computer graphics can bring potentially dry and difficult subjects to life, as witnessed by the multiple well-received physics programmes of the last few years. And meeting the people whose lives are changed by technology, whether patients of robotic surgeons or developing world communities benefiting from new energy solutions, would hammer home the impact of engineering ideas on the real world.

Vital to any successful factual TV show are its presenters. You need intelligent, charismatic and entertaining guides to keep the pace, make people smile or gasp and explain the difficult bits without sending everyone to sleep. Engineering needs a TV champion. And at the moment there isn’t one.

Sure, there are journalists and presenters who occasionally cover the topic. Former Scrapheap Challenge presenter and sometime Red Dwarf star Robert Llewellyn has navigated Channel Five viewers through a reworking of Discovery Channel show How Do They Do It? and produced his own YouTube series (as well as hosting The Engineer awards for the past two years).

But what’s really needed is a voice that resonates with a younger audience and can connect the predominantly middle-aged white male world of engineering with our more plural, modern society. And that’s why no member of the Top Gear team should be considered. The last thing that’s needed is a badly dressed, conservative motormouth making jokes based on crude stereotypes.

And that’s not to say a middle-aged white man couldn’t do the job. Just look at Prof Brian Cox, the man who’s made science, if not quite cool, then mainstream, accessible and current. Indeed the words used at the IMechE summit were ‘a Brian Cox of engineering’. Cox is seemingly everywhere at the moment, so if he were given the role his fame would probably overshadow the whole project. But this should be the model.

Given the dearth of famous engineers or even famous people with engineering degrees, the field is open to suggestions. Dr Mark Miodownik, presenter of last year's Royal Institution Christmas Lectures, is currently working on television projects. And there are certainly plenty of science writers out there who could have a great stab.

The Engineer’s features editor, Stuart Nathan, suggested author and journalist Angela Saini, apparently described as the person who 'makes geeks cool'. An engineering graduate and former BBC reporter, she’s just published a book about the rise of India as a scientific superpower, entitled Geek Nation.

Unless we can find someone who can help grab the attention of young people and the wider public, we’ll just have to get working on a time machine so we can bring back Brunel.


Readers' comments (32)

  • "Factory floor visits wouldn’t make for thrilling viewing, true, but testing the latest engine prototypes or seeing spacecraft with British-made components in action would get people tuning in."

    Do we know this to be fact? I personally am fascinated by how various manufacturing processes are done ... but I'm an engineer (by education).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What about Dr Sue Ion, late of BNFL well qualified and an excellent communicator

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Vital to any successful factual TV show are its presenters. You need intelligent, charismatic and entertaining guides to keep the pace, make people smile or gasp and explain the difficult bits without sending everyone to sleep. Engineering needs a TV champion. And at the moment there isn’t one."

    Do we know this to be true? The History Channel and Discovery Channel cover their topics and we never see the commentator.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Top Gear snobbery is not required.
    How about Dyson, Sinclair, Whittle, Cosworth or Chapman?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • For my choice I feel James Dyson would be a great inspiration and should be well known to most.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I know Angela Saini and she is a great - she truly 'makes geeks cool' while enthusing about the power of engineering and technology to change the world.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark Williams and Chris Barrie have both presented engineering programs in a knowledgable and informative manner and been entertaining too. Similarly Dick Strawbridge. Yes, I watch too much Discovery Channel!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think Mr. Neale has the right approach. (American talking here, hope I'm not intruding). There's a show over on this side of the Pond called NCIS, about the Naval Crime Scene Investigation teams. While fictional, it promotes the use of science and engineering in the solution of crimes or odd situations. A weekly show that highlights a problem, then shows how engineers go about tackling it, with actors - because we all know how well we engineers do in a public setting! - and a few special effects for the kiddies, might be very helpful. I know when I do volunteer lectures at the local schools, everyone knows who Special Agent Gibbs is - the team leader on NCIS.
    With the right syllabus, Discovery or some other channel might be interested?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I read this article with interest and agree with the conclusion it comes to, including the mention of my good self.
    However an important part of this debate is the broadcasters themselves and the enormous fear and resistance to make a TV series about what they would describe as 'such a dry subject.'
    In many ways I am in a very good position to get a show which covers engineering on the telly but it is incredibly difficult. I've been trying week in week out for the last 3 years.
    Cooking, home decorating, singing, dancing or covering unknown celebs in insects is easy to get on the box. A show about engineering is very very difficult.
    Scrapheap had a very big impact and I'm very proud of my involvement in it, we did cover a great many engineering concepts over its ten year history and I know from many people I've met it fostered a life long interest in this vitally important area. There is no way we'd get a show like Scrapheap off the ground now, and as some readers may know, I am now aiming my energies toward online distribution, thankfully with some success.
    www.llewtube.com for more details

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would take a different approach and not use one person, but a team of engineers from all backgrounds to give a wider scope of engineering. In addition I would be promoting engineering among the young, particularly in schools to stimulate the youngsters. At this age they are more receptive, and ask poigniant questions as most have inquisitive minds. Stimulating youngsters would be beneficial for the future understanding of all aspects of engineering.

    How could this be done? speakers at school careers classes would be a start, then make it interesting but not gimicky. Show how engineering influences all spheres of life from what they wear to the everyday items they take for granted. Explain the wide ranging scope of engineering from electronic to mechanical, and how it interacts with science, technology, and everyday commodities.

    Such discussions need engineers with wide ranging skills, and it should be a two way interaction rather than a talk. This means no agenda or schedule, rather let the children lead the discussion and let it develop.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

Related images

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Digital Edition

The Engineer July Digi Issue

Poll

Should deepening tensions with Russia - and concerns over the impact of economic sanctions - influence the UK's energy policy?

Previous Poll

Europe's largest tidal array in the Pentand Firth off Orkney will eventually generate up to 86MW of power. What will it take for tidal energy to make an appreciable contribution to the UK's energy needs?

Read and comment on the results here