Advanced search

Engineering needs to invest in work experience

Engineering graduates don’t have enough practical skills. There’s an argument that we’ve heard so often it’s become a cliché. ‘University courses teach you the theory but you need real work experience before you’re ready for the job,’ argue not only outright critics of our academic system but also employers who say they are struggling to recruit young people with the right skills.

In the current depressed economic times, it’s never been more important for engineering graduates to have a work experience placement on their CVs. The Higher Education Careers Services Unit (HESCU) says 10 per cent of recent engineering graduates are out of work – higher than for graduates of social sciences such as psychology and geography. So job applicants are facing stiffer competition than probably ever before.

Students are well aware that work experience is key. ‘There has been a significant rise in the number looking for internships,’ says HESCU’s deputy director of research, Charlie Ball. The number of students and graduates viewing engineering internship opportunities on the Prospects careers website has increased by 27 per cent between 2009 and 2011.

But new research suggests that engineering companies just aren’t offering the placements that employers themselves say are so important. In a survey of engineering graduates from predominantly top-ranking universities, the number one complaint against potential employers was the lack of opportunity to experience the world of work.

‘It was the most passionate part of their response,’ says Chris Philips, chair of the TARGETjobs Engineering Forum, which carried out the survey of 1000 graduates through its careers website. ‘Students are broadly content that their degrees taught them technical skills and employability skills, but there aren’t enough relevant work placements over the whole spread of engineering companies. They also felt they were competing with European students who have placement opportunities built into the degree courses. UK students are feeling double crossed.’

Of course many companies do offer work experience schemes to young people of different ages. According to the IET’s latest skills survey, 60 per cent of firms have taken on interns in the past 12 months. But the issue is how many placements there are compared with the number of graduates and jobs. As an example, energy firm Centrica is hiring 17 graduate engineers from a variety of disciplines this year but only offers 10 summer work experience placements. And competition is fierce. In total the company has 140 places for its graduate and summer placement schemes but receives around 5,500 applications.

If the problem is as widespread as students seem to feel it is, then the industry really needs to take note because it could be damaging what is already a struggling skills market. Depending on whom you talk to, either there aren’t enough engineering graduates, or their skills don’t meet the requirements of employers, or too many of them are going into other industries. Employers who tell students they can’t have a job without work experience but then don’t offer any placements could be exacerbating all these problems.

If students are turned away from engineering jobs they could be more likely to look to other sectors, not least those that offer more money for their problem solving skills. Universities can only do so much: industry needs to play its part in training the engineers of tomorrow, especially if such a premium is put on practical job experience. And if young people are assessing the employability of different subjects – increasingly likely now that the cost of a degree has tripled – they’ll be less likely to choose engineering if they feel their three years of study won’t lead to a job.

So why aren’t more placements available to young people? Although health and safety bureaucracy can cause a serious headache for those setting placements for under-18s, they shouldn’t have the same trouble accepting university students. ‘Once they become adults, young people have a lot more common sense,’ says John Nollett, managing director of steering system manufacturer Pailton Engineering, which employs 150 people and places both under- and over-18s in work experience and apprenticeships. ‘We have a robust health and safety regime in place already for our employees so we’re not worried about older people doing work experience.’

A problem for some firms, particular smaller more specialised ones, is that students don’t have enough knowledge to be able to drop in for a few weeks and gain meaningful experience. ‘Our work is so specialist that we can’t just take anyone – they need proper training,’ says Michelle Rix, operations manager at green energy firm Ecotricity, which doesn’t offer work experience to engineering students.

‘Companies do appreciate that if you can’t do work placements properly you may as well not do them at all,’ says Philips. And this is the biggest problem for engineering firms: work placements cost time and money, which many companies can ill afford especially in the current economic climate. ‘Senior executives say they get the need for more work experience but it’s a resource issue,’ says Philips, who adds that many companies he has spoken to are planning to put more money into work experience schemes.

Increased commitment from employers does seem like the key way this situation can be improved. Another could be closer cooperation between industry and academia to ensure universities are turning out graduates with the skills needed to make them employable. Perhaps more courses should look at incorporating placements into their curricula.

‘The sector needs to ask if it is properly articulating what it needs to universities and if it is being realistic,’ says Ball. ‘What are the skills deficiencies and can employers address this problem themselves? But we have to be nuanced about our approach. We need to make the case that being an engineer is an excellent career option. Engineering employers and universities need to have a good thoughtful dialogue and not blame each other.’

What is clear is that we need a long-term solution and investment in young people. Refusing students work experience placements might save some cash in the short-term but is only storing up problems for later on.

Readers' comments (29)

  • Being the parent of a recent graduate (1st), the reply from companies of "sorry need experience " is the common thread running through the responses to his 40 plus applications. He has been offered an internship at an international company, but the eight weeks offered will cost him a non refundable £8000 for the pleasure of gaining work experience with them. This on top of the student debt already weighing on his shoulders is just too much and he is considering forgeting the subect he has studied for to work in a supermarket, just to earn a living and start repaying the student loan. I despair for the future of this country.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • S Martin's comment:-Companies need to invest in training, Industry then needs to take the best of these and introduce them to degree courses, and give the best the opportunity to take these courses

    Have you tried to find a mechanical engineering degree course that a working apprentice could reasonably complete?
    I have not. Has anyone else?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I used to work in the transmitter division of a well known quango. From time to time we would have GEEs (Graduate Entry Engineers) visit for six week attachments. After six weeks here there and everywhere they would become managers! Now to be perfectly frank I only ever met one GEE who could solder, sharpen a drill and drill a hole properly. One memorable experience was when a GEE wanted to drill a 1/2" hole in an Eddystone die cast box. The workshop had a decent three phase Meddings drill press which had previously been used for drilling #60 holes in printed circuit boards. It was on its top speed. Enter the unpopular GEE. He fits the 1/2" drill bit into the drill chuck OK and switches on. The drill press hisses with the speed. All the workshop staff in the know take cover. As soon as the drill bit touches the box it grabs it, whirls it round and flings it through the window. Well at least he learnt something!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just managed to grab one of the very last apprenticeships at Taylor Woodrow, in the 80's. In those days I am sure the government gave a tax break for the apprentice place - therefore the entire £5k salary for the first few years and college costs where written off against tax. Win-Win situation all round I think....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • With British industry - it’s always someone else’s fault isn’t it?
    I train them up, they leave
    I don‘t train them, so they leave to get better work experience /training somewhere else.
    There aren’t enough people for what I want to pay them
    I have to bring in foreigners; they are the ones with the skills
    Blah, blah, blah
    Repeat ad nauseum until the lights go out.
    I have stopped listening now, those who adapt to the future - get one…..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'd like to know what happened to the requirement that for an (IMECHE) accredited degree, you had to do some workshop training. You can now, it seems, get to CENG without picking up so much as a file.

    Couple that with the ongoing discussions on the vastly reduced quality of degrees. First, you now need MEng to get chartered, secondly, even on MEng courses, students are not necessarily taught such basics as the beam bending formula, and expecting a Graduate to be able to solve a simple differential equation can induce total panic. Given the low standards from GCSE English, written work is frequently verging on the illiterate, and it seems the whole education system fails to impress on students the need to check their own work. No wonder we have serious issues- work experience is expected to pick up the gross failure of academia.

    Work experience was critical even when the infeed from the education system was fit for purpose, and I'm pleased to say we take a number of year-and summer- placement students.

    Of course, that's not enough. Now University fees have had to be increased to allow everyone to get a so-called degree, however facile the subject matter may be, young Engineers come to us saddled with debt, and we will need to find some way of mitigating this as the time they spend at university is having to increase. Unless slipping standards are reversed, it will soon be the case that we will be demanding PhD's from Graduate trainees, as some MEng courses are already inadequate.

    There is already a woeful shortage of good quality Engineers in this country and on my own experience of this year's Graduate cohort, 80% of Mech Eng graduates are not sufficiently prepared to enter a Graduate Training scheme; I cannot, for example, spare the time to give them the maths and physics preparation I had to show merely to get an offer of a place at university.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'd like to know why so many people can have a view on a subject that they don't actually know much about?

    I did have to pick up a file to pass my B.Eng degree surprisingly... IMechE qualifications do require an M.Eng that also requires a practical element of experience.

    Beam bending formula ARE taught at B.Eng level, I know because I struggled with it...

    Unless people work in universities (ie. lecturers on these courses) or they are the direct graduates coming out, how can people judge how the current crop of graduates are performing? Times change, technology changes with it, in 5 years time it may not be necessary to pick up that file to pass an Engineering degree - whose fault is that though?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Our company, an SME employing 30 people, has recently taken on a graduate as a trainee team leader in the factory.

    The person who has joined us is good, but did not have many applicants and our approach to our university contacts provided little support in this.

    Perhaps graduates ought to look beyond the large companies.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I was an apprentice electrician with shell in the mid 70's.our plant stopped taking apprentices in the mid 80's.eventually we had to employ contractors in their late 60's such was the shortageMy daughters school has stoped work experience and her dt lessons are next to useless.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say


My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article