Sunday, 19 May 2013
masthead+quote+image
Advanced search

Renewable hopes and concerns

As the world’s leaders prepare to meet in Rio at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development this week, closer to home there are several events looking at specific ways to address the issue of how to meet our energy needs without causing irreparable damage to the planet.

Advocates of biomass believe the raw material is suitable as a replacement for fossil fuels, but it is not sufficient for all applications and ranks in priority after food and feed.

These and other issues will be discussed at The European Biomass Conference and Exhibition thatkicks off today in Milan.

The week-long conference is billed as the world’s leading science-to-science, business-to-business and science-to-industry events for the biomass sector.

Day one sees the launch of the first World Forum on Fuel, Food and the Environment: The Bioenergy Challenge.

The organisers say the main purpose of the World Forum is to stimulate open discussion from all stakeholders on the future of bioenergy and biofuels, and specifically, how policy makers can steer a sustainable course through the many complex issues within the biofuel debate.

Issues to be debated by experts include: steps towards worldwide governance of biofuels; factors effecting the impact of biofuel production on food, environment and green house gas emissions; and regulatory approaches to reduce Indirect Land Use Changes effects on the environment.

Renewable, decentralised energy and the export opportunities it presents for UK companies is on the agenda at an event taking place tomorrow in Germany.

Decentralised Energy Solutions in Great Britain and Germany (Renewable Energy) has been organized by UKTI Germany, which says the event is a unique networking opportunity for British manufacturers of small and microgeneration technologies interested in the German market.

The UK and Germany have set ambitious emissions targets but both need to ensure a secure, stable and affordable energy supply. Decentralised generation solutions could play an important role on the road to achieving this goal.

Delegates will convene in Düsseldorf to look at PV, solar thermal, ground and air source heat pumps, wind turbines and hydro, and their respective roles in a decentralised energy system.

The workshop will explore these by looking at British and German frameworks and incentive schemes to support small and micro-generation technologies as well as market entry strategies.

Meanwhile in the UK itself, the Geological Society of London is holding a discussion on shale gas fracking. Research published earlier this year showed that there was a minimal probability that hydraulic fracturing for shale gas would contaminate shallow aquifers.

The paper’s lead author, Prof Richard Davies from Durham University, will speak as part of an public briefing where policy makers, industry representatives, scientists and the public can discuss the potential for shale gas as a UK resource and its safe extraction.

North of the border, Aberdeen is set to host Innovate with Aberdeen – A Funding Guide tomorrow, where Scottish technology companies are expected to gather to learn about access European funding.

Hosted by Aberdeen University and Scotland Europa, the event will see representatives from Scottish SMEs take part in round-table discussions on a range of funding-related themes including European funding, knowledge transfer partnerships and innovation vouchers.

Finally, the rumble of heavy army land systems will be heard around Millbrook in Bedfordshire this week as companies gather to show off their military hardware.

Taking place on the 20 and 21st, the organisers of DVD2012 say the event brings together the acquisition and support community with military stakeholders and industry organisations for two days of informal discussion, briefings, demonstrations and displays.

Readers' comments (13)

  • The only common thread about the comments on this thoughtful news piece prefacing Rio+20 is that lots of people have their own pet technological preferences and that they tend to denigrate those they don't like. So we have pro-Thorium reactor people, pro-hydro, pro Fusion (50 years of research and still dreaming!), pro solar, pro and anti-biomass, anti-wind, buy my wonder invention etc etc.

    Anyone who even half believes the climate change problem will quickly realise that we are going to need an awful lot of improved energy efficiency as well as a wide range of renewable technologies to get even close to turning the trend of disastrous climatic change. Though I'm quite pro-biomass - mainly due to it's flexibility in providing heat, power, liquid fuels and bio-chemicals, I wouldn't propose to create the straw man that many of the comments do in trying to run the whole country or the world on biomass. That makes little sense. Wiser analysis suggests 20-40% of global energy could come from this bundle of technologies without endangering food supplies or biodiversity.

    While Brian Wilson's comments on biomass are littered with basic scientific errors, the main point we all need to grasp is that we'd better start making decisions and shifting investment away from fossil fuels pretty quickly. Otherwise engineers will find their views sidelined.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with Stewarts comments and we need to stop bickering about which is best and just get on with all of it PDQ. We need investment now before we miss the boat. If we (UK), want to be self reliant on energy we must pull our finger out and do it, or else we will be left behind and be held to ransom by every one else who did get their act together!
    With all the expert engineering know-how and R&D in this country, it would be particularly galling to have to source and buy all of our reactors, turbines, wave/tidal machinery, etc from abroad just because we were too busy arguing over who should put up the money for the future, all of our future.
    What is the phrase? Use it or lose it, I believe. (Sheffield Forgemasters & Isle of Wight turbines spring to mind!)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The notion that this or any other western instrument of government is interested in true sustainability issues - and will actually do anything - is rapidly becoming obvious.

    Indeed the only so called solutions to this entirely bogus energy crisis are those being innovated by small independent researchers and other organisations that would be able to implement solutions but for the megalithic bureaucracies and spaghetti bowls of red tape.

    2,200 miles of waterways and no use of micro hydro

    Instead literally billions of the public purse thrown down the vortex of studies, impact assessments, strategic analysis and of course regulation designed to favour the nephilim of global corps.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article

Digital Edition

The Engineer May Digital Edition

Poll

Forward-looking flying car specialist Terrafugia has unveiled a new autopilot-equipped STOVL concept which it says could be on sale in 8-12 years. But will the science-fiction staple of the flying car ever take off?

Previous Poll

NASA chief Charles Bolden says that the agency is moving forwards with plans for a manned Mars mission, but there are significant ‘technology gaps’. Which of these is likely to be the most difficult to overcome?

Read and comment on the results here