Advanced search

Public favour rail upgrades over HS2, says survey

New research suggests most people believe the £42.6bn cost of the High Speed 2 rail network should be spent on upgrading existing infrastructure.

The vast majority (74 per cent) of respondents to a poll commissioned by the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) said they would never or rarely use HS2, and 58 per cent said the money would be better spent on the existing network – almost double the number of those who oppose the project outright.

Almost two-thirds (68 per cent) of respondents said they believed the UK’s rail network was worse than those in other Western European countries. But the IMechE said failing to build HS2 would lead to a continued worsening of the existing network compared to other countries, particularly through overcrowding, and that the government and industry needed to do a better job of communicating the benefits of the project.

‘This isn’t some sort of white elephant,’ the IMechE director of engineering Dr Colin Brown told The Engineer. ‘This will help capacity on the other parts of the network because it takes a lot of the [existing] high-speed passenger activity out.’

HS2 would also ensure the British rail industry maintained a skills base and a familiarity with the latest technology that would enable future capital projects and have a positive effect on the rest of the network, he added.

‘If we do not have a sequence of projects our infrastructure will stay stuck in the 1960s. If you go to China, they have an intrinsic belief that good infrastructure leads to good business.’

The government has claimed that taking intercity trains off the existing network onto the high-speed link between London, Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds would increase Britain’s rail capacity by 143 per cent of volume, compared to 53 per cent for upgrade programme that would also require a substantial period of engineering works.

However, others have claimed that estimates for future passenger growth have been exaggerated and that other smaller projects would be more cost-effective in reducing existing overcrowding and with less disruption to the network than HS2.

Brown said the survey also indicated that the project could free up space on the road network because around half of the 21 per cent of people who said they would occasionally or frequently use HS2 said it would replace existing journeys they made by car.

Opinion on HS2 among the 2000 people interviewed was split almost evenly, with 33 per cent supporting and 31 per cent opposing the project, with a further 30 per cent saying they were indifferent.

Of those who opposed it, 80 per cent said the project was too expensive, 73 per cent said the alternative of upgrading the existing network would be a better use of money and 62 per cent said it would damage the UK countryside.

In response to the survey, HS2 lead spokesperson Ben Ruse said: ’It is high time we put to bed one of the common misconceptions to overshadow the project. HS2 is not being built at the expense of other transport projects in the country. The Government is investing more than £56bn on roads, other rail & local transport between 2015 & 2021.

’The  truth is that even if we spent £20 billion patching and mending the existing main lines, it would deliver less than half the benefits of HS2 – and would require weekend closures on the East Coast and Midland Mainline for up to 14 years.

’In addition to supporting up to 400,000 jobs across the UK, taking freight off the motorways and providing faster journey times between our major cities, HS2 will also integrate seamlessly into the existing rail network. For example, high speed trains will be able to stop at Crewe Station and carry on the West Coast Mainline towards places such as Liverpool and Preston.’ 

Readers' comments (14)

  • The tunnels are not high enough , they were built in the 1800's when trains were fairly simple and small in size !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I live in the Southeast the garden of England. We have HS1 running through our county.

    I still don't see what benifits we actually get from it. (Apart from the empty trains whizzing across the Medway bridge).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Unfortunately our politicians think we are all too stupid to check whether the assumptions used to justify projects such as HS1 are actually born out once the project is completed. The case for HS2 is based on A. The value of the time saved and B. A predicted massive increase in business travel between the centres served by the new route. The first is just plain silly and the second is very unlikely given the existing trend towards more efficient working through improved communications technology. I doubt whether HS2, if built, will ever reach even 50% or the capacity used to justify it. Have you used the M6 Toll? It is empty. Has it reduced congestion on the M6 round Birmingham which was the main justification used to promote the project? Answers on a postcard!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I find the comments here and in the media in general quite depressing. The UK really needs to wake up to the modern era. Why are we continuing to think that a 19th century infrastructure is good enough? High speed rail is an essential transport requirement. Yes it is expensive to install, especially in a crowded island such as ours, but come on Britain! Surely the Dawlish incident should proove to all that our current network is really not fit for purpose. China have built more than 3000km of high speed lines in the last decade, yet here we are arguing over one short section of line that will take a couple of decade to build.

    I think HS2 should be billed as the first of a series of lines linking all of the UKs major cities to each other to form a network. Where is the courage and enterprise that built the original UK rail network?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say


Related images

My saved stories (Empty)

You have no saved stories

Save this article