Perfecting large-scale battery technology is high on the agenda for the government. Stuart Nathan reports on the latest developments here and around the world.
An energy storage installation from UniEnergy Technologies
Energy storage is often seen as the most important missing part in the electricity infrastructure of many countries, not least the UK. The main reason for this is renewable power. Wind, solar and marine energy (wave and tidal) have the potential to generate large amounts of electricity, but being dependent on natural processes they are not predictable and sometimes occur at periods diametrically opposed to when they are needed – for example, the sun shines during the day but we switch our lights on at night. Being able to store the energy in times of plenty – when it’s windy, sunny or the tide is coming in or going out – and then release it to the grid when it’s needed would allow renewables to be used to their full potential, and further reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
There are many ways to store energy. Pumped storage, where water held in a reservoir at a high altitude is allowed to run through a turbine flowing down to a lower reservoir, is among the most reliable and is used in the UK, Scandinavia and elsewhere. Compressed air storage is also increasingly scrutinised, as is using surplus electricity to liquefy air so that it can be allowed to evaporate through a turbine (Highview Power, a pioneer in this field, is a previous winner of an Engineer award for innovation). The so-called hydrogen economy, where surplus electricity is used to electrolyse water, and the resulting hydrogen stored to be converted back into electricity through a fuel cell, has been touted as a solution for decades. All of these systems have been covered by The Engineer.
The technology that is currently receiving the most innovative engineering attention is, however, the energy storage solution that electrified the Industrial Revolution and one we have all been familiar with from our childhoods: batteries. But these are not Triple-As. They are large and highly sophisticated devices capable of holding very high amounts of charge and releasing them in the way that is required for the grid.
The workhorse for grid-scale storage today is the lithium-ion battery; not just the same battery technology that is used to power electric cars, but literally the same battery. The best known large-scale grid storage facility in the world, built by Tesla in South Australia, is known simply as the Big Battery. This consists of a very large array of Tesla’s Powerwall units, based on the same type of battery that powers Tesla’s cars.
Properly known as the Hornsdale Power Reserve, it is rated at 100MW/129MWh and stores wind energy from the adjacent Hornsdale wind farm and solar energy from domestic photovoltaic panels across the state. According to Tesla, it stores enough energy to power more than 30,000 homes. “By allowing renewable energy to be dispatched during peak periods when the wind is not blowing and mitigating the need for expensive gas peaking generation, South Australian electricity prices will be both lowered and stabilised,” Tesla said
Tesla lithium-ion units at the Horsndale Power Reserve
Australian battery expansion
Elsewhere in Australia, in late March the Australian government announced that it would invest $25m (£13.5m), matching an investment from the State of Victoria, to fund large-scale grid-connected batteries, together providing 50MW of power and some 80MWh of energy storage. Both will be located near solar farms; one at Gannawarra, near Kerang, again using batteries supplied by Tesla, and one at Warrenheip, Ballarat, with batteries supplied by Fluence. “Both Victorian batteries will help demonstrate how large-scale batteries can provide different benefits to the electricity system, including improving grid stability and power quality, and how they can help integrate more variable renewable energy into the grid,” said the Australian Renewable Energy Agency.
But despite lithium-ion batteries being the current preferred option, according to Prof Clare Grey, a theoretical chemist and specialist in rechargeable battery chemistry at the University of Cambridge, they are not necessarily the best option for this application. “Lithium-ion is good for short-term storage,” she said. “But how are you going to store energy for the weeks and months you might need if you went for an all-wind scenario? You either have absolutely massive storage facilities or you shunt electricity around over large distances, even between countries. The other issue is whether battery packs are going to last for long enough for the really big-scale applications. Lithium-ion batteries last on average two to seven years, but a lot of utility companies work in 20- to 40-year timescales. That’s a challenge, and although it’s grossly straightforward to change out a spent battery, it will come with a cost.”
Redox flow cells
Grey pinpoints other battery technologies such as sodium-ion as a drop-in replacement for lithium-ion, even being potentially cheaper, along with so-called “beyond lithium” solutions such as lithium-sulphur. But she sees the ultimate solution as a different type of battery known as a redox flow cell (sometimes known as a vanadium flow cell). These are, in essence, a type of fuel cell rather than a traditional electrochemical battery. “They are much larger-scale batteries where you have vats of liquids of oxidised and reduced chemicals and you flow them in and out to recover power whenever you need it. In principle, they are completely scalable, but just as expensive as lithium-ion, if not more so.”
This will not necessarily always be the case. Redox flow cells are more like process engineering equipment than Tesla’s solid-state batteries, consisting in part of components like tanks and pumps, which have benefited from economies of manufacturing scale. “We are waiting for the price to come down,” Grey explained.
Inside Rognke Power’s vandium flow cell facility
But that hasn’t dissuaded China, one of the giants of the battery world. In Dalian, Rongke Power is operating a battery factory even larger than Elon Musk’s Gigafactory in Nevada, which produces Tesla’s batteries. Occupying an area larger than 20 football fields, the Rongke factory is producing components for what will take over from the Hornsdale Reserve as the world’s biggest battery: a 200MW, 800MWh facility serving China’s Liaoning province.
Writing in the American Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers journal, Spectrum, Z Gary Yang, who led a team at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the US which developed vanadium flow cells in the early 2000s, explains the origins of the technology at NASA in the early 1970s. Yang describes it as a possible technology to power deep space missions where solar energy would not be available and with no need to store the hydrogen that powered the fuel cells of the Apollo missions – and so nearly caused disaster on Apollo 13. Evolving through research at the University of New South Wales, near considerable vanadium deposits, Yang’s team created a new type of redox flow cell with a vanadium-based electrolyte relying on reactions in a chloride solution which doubled the energy density of previous generations of cells, because more vanadium ions remained stable in solution and were available during charging and discharging. This is more advanced than the type being deployed by Rongke Energy.
Yang now runs a Washington State-based company named UniEnergy Technologies (UET), which specialises in megawatt-scale battery installations that fit inside a standard shipping container. “We’ve also brought down the batteries’ cost,” he said. “A few years ago, the cost of a four-hour VRFB [vanadium reflux flow battery] system was about $800 [£565] per kWh. These days, it’s about half that, comparable to the cost of a stationary lithium-ion system. But that’s not an apples-to-apples comparison. Lithium-ion’s capacity degrades over time, and its life span is shorter. We’ve tested individual VRFBs through more than 14,000 cycles, fully charging and discharging each cycle, and they still perform at 100 per cent capacity. This should translate into a life span of 20 years or more.”
Today’s technology
Of course, batteries are not the only thing that you need in a grid-scale electrochemical storage facility. Prof Richard McMahon, an expert in power electronics at Warwick Manufacturing Group, specialises in the additional equipment needed for such facilities and is not so focused on the battery chemistry as Clare Grey. “There’s a difference in perception between a research chemist and an applications engineer, which is me,” he said. “I look at what I can get now and what I’m likely to be able to get in the foreseeable future because that’s what I’ve got to do projects on. So I can perfectly understand that Clare comes from a more theoretical research standpoint, and can say that there could be better battery chemistries, and that may well be true and probably is, but I’m not going to see those battery chemistries as commercial batteries in, say, under 10 years. My projects are to put batteries into static energy storage working with my industrial partners; we are looking at what we can buy today. I’d be delighted if the theoretical or research chemists can produce some wonderful battery in five years that can outperform lithium.”
There are two important factors to consider when designing a facility, McMahon explained. These are the total amount of energy you want to store, which is measured in kilowatt or megawatt hours, and the other is how fast you need to push the energy out, measured in kilowatts, megawatts or gigawatts. The nature of the energy going into the system is much less important. “One of the very important grid services is a very fast frequency response when there’s an increasing load on the system or a dropout in other generating capacity. National Grid would like some power pretty quickly, fractions of a second – it might want 100MW in the next few milliseconds.”
The ancillary equipment that is McMahon’s speciality varies according to what type of battery is being used. Lithium batteries, for example, need a battery management system to monitor the state of all the individual electrochemical cells in the battery. Electric vehicles are equipped with such systems, McMahon said, and static batteries need precisely the same monitoring. Moreover, he added, as batteries use direct current but the National Grid is alternating current, “a box of power electronics” is needed to convert DC to AC and vice versa.
In fact, with the increasing prevalence of DC electronics and equipment, McMahon believes that AC’s days might even be numbered. “We’ve started to see developments in the DC world. Solar generation, wind are all DC, and batteries of course are DC. At the top level we are also seeing DC gridlines like the one that comes from Scotland down to North Wales; the UK isn’t big enough really to have DC interconnectors, but of course we have the interconnectors to other countries: France, Holland, there is the Norway one in planning, and China’s got a lot of long-distance DC cables.”
The Dalian ‘gigafactory’
DC microgrids, supplying for example a large supermarket, industrial facility, a group of up to 50 houses or university campus, are a distinct possibility, he added. However, when asked if he were designing a whole new city, whether he would build a DC grid from scratch, McMahon chuckled. “We are just so used to AC, we can get the equipment at Screwfix. You can buy consumer units with AC circuit protection for very little money – you can’t buy those for DC – so it’s a bit of a brave step.”
Optimistic investment
Profs Grey and McMahon are part of The Faraday Institution, an organisation set up in the wake of business secretary Greg Clark’s decision to identify energy storage as a key strategic strength for the UK that needs to be built up. The institution is part of a three-pronged initiative known as the Faraday battery challenge. Faraday Institution spokesman Matt Howard explained: “The idea was, can we identify that we have in the UK all the essential components, and can we maximise the opportunity space for making the UK a player on the world stage of batteries?”
In its initial phase, funded by a £42m grant, the institution is focusing on automotive batteries because of the strong UK automotive industry. “We have some of the best world-class researchers in the basic science here, and we have government interest in innovation and cleaner air, and there’s an opportunity to maximise all this now. And there is some urgency because I think the government has recognised the world is racing forward and we can be part of that solution,” Howard said.
The institution’s research projects will last for three years in the first phase, then this will be followed by a series of regional workshops to identify the top challenges in each area. Howard acknowledges that the UK has had a spotty history with battery development: for example, lithium-ion batteries were originally invented in Oxford, but some years ahead of the development of camcorders and mobile phones, by which time the batteries were commercialised in East Asia and the US.
But it would be wrong to see the Faraday Institution as an attempt to correct that. “I see it as a much more optimistic investment, as opposed to trying to reclaim a historic loss,” Howard said.
The transport technical press is today carrying an article about the long term cost effective and secure supply of battery materials for the automotive sector. This might potentially dilute the impact and timing of the rush to electric road vehicles and this is before any considerations of recharging passenger and freight vehicles in big numbers.
In 1966 (whilst an Engineer at a well known manufacturer of synthetic fibres based in Yorkshire) I had an interview with a well-known manufacturer of Chocolate in that county! The original owner/founder of that firm, a Quaker, had been a great one for technical innovation: and had specified -perhaps one of the first in the country- DC power to be generated on site and used throughout the factories and company housing. The problem was that by 1960s the installation was almost alone in the UK -everyone else was AC! The team of Engineers being assembled were tasked with assessing, and then designing and installing/making the substantial conversion(s) necessary for the future. I have often wondered how those recruited did!
I thought that the reason we changed to AC was for safety, AC will throw you off the conductor, DC will make you hold on.
No, it was because transformers work AC.
No, it’s the other way around. I have scars on both my hands to prove it. Not a pleasant experience and I was lucky to survive.
I’m waiting for the bunny that is still going when all others have gone flat!
I thought AC was adopted for the ease at which voltages could be stepped up and down using simple transformers – to enable more efficient power transmission.
Check out the MIT group and their liquid metals (and molten salt) battery now running at a mere 270 deg. C. The parasitic losses from high operating temperature of the early batteries have been thusly removed (by a high percentage), and these batteries never give up, and won’t back down.
They are extremely stable during cycling tests, and offer energy capacity and power density commensurate with the needs of the modern grid. Move over Lithium ion, the days of sodium-sodium-antimony (or bismuth) in molten lead, with molten salt electrolyte are almost here.
I also recently saw a presentation on large pumped hydro where the mass being lifted is essentially stone held sealed (with some neat O-ring tech) over an underground water reserve. This removes virtually all of the site requirements for pumped hydro (except the part where the underground strata must be a nearly monolithic stone formation with good mechanical strength, little cracking.)
Check out FWG Carbon Batteries no Lithium, Cobalt or Nickel and better energy density using a Graphene based ink and paper, could be easy to manufacture in the UK using existing printing technology and any carbon we have lying around in the ground 🙂
Unfortunately there wasn’t space in this feature to discuss this type of technology. Another feature will follow in the coming months.
Batteries are good for very short time period intervention or frequency response but not and probably never for 5 to 7 days (which happens occasionally in the UK) of low renewable wind in winter in an industrial economy. Whilst increased renewable pumped hydro, compressed air, cryogenic , etc. can take some strain they are costly. Gas, which scales well, preferably renewable and low carbon – methane, gasification, PTG power to gas, etc. can be used only occasionally but still keep us below CCC CO2 emission levels. Gas turbines OTC are relatively cheap, and existing CCGT (bought for peanuts by the state!) can be ramped up as wind does not drop off a cliff like a nuclear blackout (which requires instant massive infill – 3200MW in the case of the yet to be built EDF Hinkley Point C station).
Vanadium flow cells are apparently capable of the 5-7 day storage you mention.
Battery is a storage word -it is a way of holding some power that has been stored in plentiful times and released when needed -the United Kingdom has a natural storage system -unavailable to a lot of flat countries -if we were to develop water storage at an appropriate height it would be clean aesthetically beautiful -recharged by the sun – quiet -It just needs the long term planning that is now lacking to release the natural effect of gravity and drink the success .
Bulk battery staorage of whatever form is not the solution because of their inheritent disadvantages too numerous to list. There’s a much, much better sustainable technology which is already well-known: high radius of gyration and mass and comparatively low RPM flywheels.
The recently installed Tesla Powerpack in South Australia mentioned above could have been delivered using about 400 x oneGJ flywheels 99x116MJ on same shaft giving the same storage capacity, in about the same area, without any of the serious disadvantages of using a battery based systems. This flywheel-based alternative could be used for hundreds of years with no loss of performance which would hugely reduce its comparative operating costs over time and would save the planet from the complexity, short-termism and toxicity of all these battery based proposals. I have already developed the casting drawings and the general circuit diagrams to support single or 3 phase delivery and I hope we build and operate an example in India soon.
Indeed flywheels are a component of the Hydro Tasmania island/isolated small grid solution that provide 60 to 70% annual renewables but capable of operating at 100% renewable when the (mostly wind) resource is available. The 60 to 70% is the current economically viable renewable input. If the infill generator was operated with biodiesel or renewable gas it would be 100% renewable.
https://www.kangarooisland.sa.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/4%20%20HydroTasmania_SimonGamble_Kangaroo%20Island%20Presentation.pdf
They have stated ;
“Hydro Tasmania: There is no reason that reliable, stable, low emission and economic renewable energy solutions will not dominate the future energy sector. Hydro Tasmania has already shown this is possible and at different scales. On our multi-MW scale hybrid systems on King and Flinders islands we are able to operate these systems for considerable periods with 100% renewable energy while enhancing system stability. The levels of renewable resource variability
managed in the King and Flinders systems is extreme, with the enabling technologies keeping the system safe and stable through swings in renewable generation of half the system load in a few seconds. This level of variability will decrease as systems get larger, meaning the techniques we have proved on small-scale systems will transfer to larger grids relatively easily. This proves that the traditional concept of baseload generation being needed for stability is a myth.”
http://www.ecogeneration.com.au/the-right-mix-the-hybrid-solutions-that-take-the-element-of-surprise-out-of-supply/
Outstanding and practical Engineering solution(s) to issues. “Engineers do for 10p what any fool can do for £1.00” -unlike fat too many others who claim to be professional but spend (other people’s money) as much as possible to achieve (and invariably after the event) to achieve the minimum to get by. As a mechanical Engineer my natural leanings are towards anything which has the minimum of electronic/electrical components and concrete/rocks weights and flywheels would seem to fit that directly.
These are interesting technologies, but this feature was specifically about batteries rather than other types of energy storage
Mike – thanks for your support – I’ve been banging on about flywheels for several years now, but as you so rightly sated: “Engineers do for 10p what any fool can do for £1.00”. Please find me on Linkedin and I’ll share everything with you.
The recent development of batteries is indeed impressive, and augurs well for the future.
However, as with most developments there are problem issues to be resolved that also need to be pointed-out to maintain a realistic sense of proportion. The pop-press reported that a Volvo hybrid car ignited outside a house and the family had a narrow escape.
When batteries charge they heat up and can become very hot, even small batteries have caused serious fires. Gas turbine “Black-start” battery packs used to have a full fire protection system: albeit they produced hydrogen that had to be safely ventilated.
Stewart -point taken: but such is my enthusiasm for the whole concept of stored power (like stored in good times anything else for use later in bad ones -a food warehouse for example)!) that I failed my own advice ( to read the question fully! ) …assisting my granddaughter with her GCSE revision!]
One of the S American cities (I want to say BA in Argentina?) had, in the 30s, a fly-wheel system of powering trams: totally pollution free! and no overhead wires . Wonder why it was scrapped?
Compared with pumped storage batteries are incredibly expensive and have tiny storage capacity. Anyway, simply managing the thermostats of electric storage heaters is a far better way of achieving the same objective. New Zealand once had the best system in the world but then the “electricity reforms” killed it off.
At a recent conference an Australian engineer told us of the enormous effort that they had to go into in S Australia to minimise the risk of one battery catching fire and setting all the others off. Their batteries were carefully spaced to achieve this.
Tidal energy is very predictable. (Unless someone runs off with the moon; which seems unlikely). Stating that tidal energy is unpredictable is laughable.
Owing to how the tides swirl around the UK strategically placed tidal stations can ensure continual power from the system (some sites have full flow while others have none and vice versa).
it isn’t unpredictable, but it is available at times that don’t coincide with demand, which is what I said in the feature (in a slightly clumsy way).