Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon has unveiled a new National Shipbuilding Strategy which includes plans for the first batch of Type 31e frigates for the Royal Navy.
Today’s announcement is part of a new National Shipbuilding Strategy which meets the challenge set by Sir John Parker in 2016 whose independent report into British naval shipbuilding proposed far-reaching recommendations to transform the UK maritime industry.
Today’s Strategy sees the government accept Sir John’s recommendations. Building on the government’s industrial strategy, it outlines an ambition to transform the procurement of naval ships, make the UK’s maritime industry more competitive, grow the Royal Navy fleet by the 2030s, export British ships overseas, and boost innovation, skills, jobs, and productivity across the UK.
It also announces the government’s plan to procure new Type 31e General Purpose Frigates, with a price cap set at no more than £250m each for the first batch of five vessels that will be built in the UK.
Set to enter service by 2023, the frigates could be built in a way which could see them shared between yards and assembled at a central hub.
Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon said: “This new approach will lead to more cutting-edge ships for the growing Royal Navy that will be designed to maximise exports and be attractive to navies around the world.
“Backed up by a commitment to spend billions on new ships, our plan will help boost jobs, skills, and growth in shipyards and the supply chain across the UK.”
Sir John Parker said: “I am very impressed by the courage that the Secretary of State has shown – and the Government – in adopting my recommendations, which were very extensive, and will change the shape of naval shipbuilding over the country in the future.
“The next challenge is to come up with a world-leading design; one that can satisfy the needs of the Royal Navy and the export market. We have the capability to do that, the will is there and it is a tremendous opportunity for UK shipbuilding.”
Your questions answered: HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier
What a pity that we are committed by policy to sell machines for war to others, not vehicles for peace -and commerce: ie revenue earners, not revenue ‘black-holes? But Perfidious Albion does little else. Our conflict groups (the ones who still go to work in fancy dress) are incapable of anything else. Heavens, if we are not careful, we will start to believe our own publicity about how important this is. To change Fall-on to Fall-acy is one small step! (for mankind?)
“Perfidious Albion is an anglophobic pejorative ” what has this got to do with a UK national ship building strategy the comment is no more than self indulgent and grandstanding view, which would be better placed in some other but appropriate forum.
The past is irretrievably behind us but we should learn from the effects of allowing heavy industry to become the preserve of others and later reconsidering the need to reinstate it to some degree. The news is welcome in my view providing it has no nasty strings attached and it is not another short term move for an industry that needs long term vision to really become effective. If you get your ships built elsewhere then you stand in line. (while your enemies learn your secrets).
As an ex Royal Navy Communications person, I have always been at the incident control cutting edge. And have been perpetually saddened by the absolute lack of understanding shown by those who cut the RN back and then go on to regret it. Part of the problem is the effect of being “The Silent Service” as very few what we really did but easily imagined a sandy beach somewhere hot, etc. Good news about home growing our capability. Of course the work force will also have to play its part by not deciding that the weather is not quite good enough to go to work today. No good me saying that from a Battle Class Destroying, rolling its guts out inside the Arctic Circle!
in an imperfect world, home grown and developed kit for our armed services are a must have. I must register an interest as I work in a related field (dual use and military product) and the moral hazard of seeing “our” kit sold to regimes one personally finds objectionable is not lost on me – so i have some sympathy with the view of our esteemed colleague Mr.Blamey. Unfortunately we do not have a large internal market like the USA and one can only hope that our leaders and politicians use their softpower and diplomatic skills to help mould some of these regimes to be more considerate to humanity ( and avoid the nightmare of the Mig15/nene scenario) . What I am confident in is that, whatever the failings of our poitical class, our warfighting services are some of the most disciplined and restrained anywhere and deserve our support ( and i speak as a naturalised UK citizen here)