Certain professions have protected titles so why should engineering be any different? This is the question we put in last week’s poll and the results from over 700 votes indicate a bias to protecting the title of engineer.
In total, 31 per cent of respondents thought that only chartered engineer should use the title engineer; and 28 per cent agreed that industry associations should license practicing engineers .
Of the remaining 41 per cent, 26 per cent thought that engineering is too broad for protection to work, whilst 15 per cent couldn’t find a fit with the options presented to them.
Unsurprisingly, the poll led to a vigorous debate on whether engineering should have protected status, with one commentator writing to say: ‘The person with a spanner who fixes the washing machine has a title – technician, why are they calling themselves engineer? Does that mean because I took an applied science degree that I am a neurosurgeon by default? Hardly. Why would any young person good at STEM subjects aspire to fix washing machines?’
This comment is one of 72 generated so far by the poll, but what do you think? Let us know below.
Massive new Coventry campus targets 60GWh battery output
Where will all the raw materials come from for the manufacturing process? How will they be transported to the factory and what is going to be done with the various scrap and residues?