Our website uses cookies to improve your user experience. If you continue browsing, we assume that you consent to our use of cookies. More information can be found in our Privacy & Cookies Policy

X
Skip to content
  • THE STUDENT ENGINEER
  • JOBS
  • Advanced Manufacturing
  • C2I
  • Latest Issue
  • NEWSLETTER SIGNUP
The Engineer
  • News
  • In-depth
  • Opinion
  • Sectors
  • Careers
  • Supplier Network
Search Login / Register Primary Menu
Close
or Register
News Civil & structural Energy & environment Manufacturing Materials CCS

Carbon capture and conversion project aims to turn CO2 into building materials

By Helen Knight 13th April 2018 4:29 pm 17th April 2018 3:03 pm

Greenhouse gas emissions could be converted into valuable products such as building materials, following the creation of a spin-out company to commercialise carbon capture and conversion technology.

carbon capture and conversion
The technology recently progressed to the semifinal of the Carbon X-Prize

The new company, called CCM, aims to commercialise technology developed by researchers at the University of Aberdeen. The technology is capable of converting carbon dioxide emissions into carbonates for use in products such as plastics, adhesives, cements, concretes and other construction materials, according to Dr Mohammed Imbabi from the university’s School of Engineering, who is leading the project.

“If you’re trying to deal with global CO2 emissions approaching 40 gigatonnes per annum, you need a sink in which to put these emissions that is big enough to accommodate them, and the construction industry is probably one of the few that can do that,” said Imbabi.

The technology dissolves the CO2 in dilute alkali, converting it into carbonate ions. The carbonate solution is then reacted with either calcium or magnesium brines to produce Precipitated Calcium Carbonate (PCC) or Precipitated Magnesium Carbonate (PMC).

The converted feedstocks, which are carbon negative, can be used in a range of industries. PCCs are already used in paper making, plastics, paints, and adhesives, for example, while the researchers have recently developed a cementised PMC for use in buildings. The material can be cast into its final shape and thermally cured at low temperatures.

Cementised PMCs have low density but high compressive strength. They are water resistant, non-toxic, fireproof, and have good thermal and acoustic insulation properties.

The technology can use waste calcium and magnesium brines from sources such as desalination plants, and oil and gas production.

Unlike many other proposed techniques, the technology can capture CO2 from any emission source, said Imbabi. Although the team are initially focusing on developing the technology for large industrial settings such as power stations, cement factories and breweries, it could ultimately be used to capture emissions from people’s homes and cars, he said.

“Our focus is on large CO2 emitters first of all, because we want to push down as quickly as we can on emissions, but we also have a development stream which is looking at miniaturising the technology, so for example you could have a carbon capture machine fitted to your home,” said Imbabi.

The technology recently progressed to the semi-finals of the $20 million NRG COSIA Carbon XPRIZE, which is designed to accelerate the development and commercialisation of technologies to convert CO2 into valuable products.

The project also includes Emeritus Professor Fred Glasser, Chair in Chemistry at the university, and Professor Zoe Morrison, previously of the University of Aberdeen Business School.

News

Constant illumination improves photovoltaic efficiency of hybrid perovskite crystal

9th April 2018 12:07 pm 9th April 2018 12:16 pm
Opinion Policy & business

Emerging technologies: disrupting the future

10th April 2018 8:30 am 10th April 2018 10:07 am
MACH 2018

HP takes printing expertise into the third dimension

11th April 2018 4:17 pm 16th April 2018 12:37 pm
Latest ArticlesComments (4)
News Aerospace

Preliminary findings point to metal fatigue on stricken Southwest Airlines flight

19th April 2018 10:44 am 19th April 2018 10:50 am
News Manufacturing

UK’s Vert Rotors hails portable air compressor breakthrough

19th April 2018 10:38 am 19th April 2018 10:38 am
biocompatible
News Medical & healthcare

Biocompatible nanotubes promise better cancer targeting

19th April 2018 10:34 am 19th April 2018 10:34 am
/b/u/w/EDF_Hinkley_Point_C_nuclear_power_station.jpg
Opinion Nuclear

Why the nuclear sector presents huge collaboration potential for UK plc

18th April 2018 3:38 pm 18th April 2018 3:38 pm
  • Dave 16th April 2018 at 2:39 pm

    I think the problem with any carbon capture process that actually converts CO2 into something else is that energy is required, e.g. to create the dilute alkali that this process uses, but more fundamentally to break the two C=O bonds and turn the carbon dioxide into something else. If there’s a clean energy source (e.g. tidal power, or wind, or solar) available to drive the process, surely it could be used more efficiently in displacing the CO2 emitter in the first place?

    Reply Link
  • Hugh Sharman 16th April 2018 at 3:45 pm

    Oh dear! I read the headline and my heart sank. Almost all cheap, common (read sodium, potasium, calcium) alkali metals are found in nature as carbonates….! Need I say more?

    If this what passes for university research in Aberdeen?

    By all means, point out what I have missed?

    By the way, “valuable” building products need to be cheap to be truly valuable to the building and civil engineering industries!

    Reply Link
  • Jack Broughton 16th April 2018 at 4:36 pm

    Subsidy and grants are the cause of this type of research: the benefits are as Hugh says, negligible.
    Surely, the best way to capture and store carbon is in trees and other high carbon crops. These can eventually be buried (to form coal possibly) or stored inertly at the poles for future use. All trees should be protected, not harvested for inefficient combustion (especially compared with coal).

    Reply Link
  • Steven Boyd 16th April 2018 at 5:32 pm

    If you react carbonic acid with brine you will release chlorine. Where does that go?
    Wouldn’t it just be better to stop re-cycling paper and bury it? The new trees you’d need to grow to replace the paper you’d buried would capture loads of atmospheric CO2!

    Reply Link
  • Cancel reply

    Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.

Explore

  • Supplier Network
  • JOBS
  • SECTORS
    • AEROSPACE
    • AUTOMOTIVE
    • CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL
    • DEFENCE AND SECURITY
    • ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS
    • ADVANCED MANUFACTURING
    • MEDICAL AND HEALTHCARE
    • RAIL AND MARINE
    • ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
      • NUCLEAR
      • COAL, OIL AND GAS
      • ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
      • RENEWABLES
  • SKILLS AND CAREERS
  • POLICY & BUSINESS
  • THE STUDENT ENGINEER
  • ARCHIVE
  • SALARY CALCULATOR
  • SALARY SURVEY 2017
  • C2I 2017
  • THE ENGINEER 160
  • VIDEOS
  • WEBINARS
  • BACK ISSUES
  • 160 SPECIAL
  • LATEST ISSUE
  • Advertising – Display and Supplier Network
  • EVENTS
  • NEWSLETTER SIGNUP
  • Twitter
  • Contact us
  • T&Cs
  • Privacy
  • Magazine subscription
  • Digital edition

© 2018. All rights reserved.

built by interconnect/it

Centaur Communications Ltd (a member of the Centaur Media plc group)

Wells Point, 79 Wells Street, London W1T 3QN. Registered in England No: 1595235