Planning for growth
After years of leaving industry to get on with it, the government finally has a plan. But is it the right one, and can it be maintained long-term?
Engineering doesn’t take place in a vacuum. Because it is so tied up in the development of products and processes, it’s intimately tangled up with the mechanisms of the economy — contributing to balance of payments; to the import and export of raw materials, equipment, products, information and talent; to national and international finance; and to the country’s place in the world community.
It’s hardly surprising, then, that engineering is the subject of a whole raft of laws, regulations and initiatives which have a major effect on how companies and individual engineers, particularly in the manufacturing and energy sectors, go about their business. Most of these are intended to help: to provide incentives for R&D, to help companies secure intellectual property rights for their inventions, and to help gain investment to grow companies.
This, however, is a relatively new development. For many years, since the late 1970s, industrial policy was almost a dirty word in the British political establishment. Laissez-faire economics was the order of the day: the best way to help industry, it was thought, was to interfere as little as possible and let it develop in its own way.
Register now to continue reading
Thanks for visiting The Engineer. You’ve now reached your monthly limit of premium content. Register for free to unlock unlimited access to all of our premium content, as well as the latest technology news, industry opinion and special reports.
Benefits of registering
-
In-depth insights and coverage of key emerging trends
-
Unrestricted access to special reports throughout the year
-
Daily technology news delivered straight to your inbox
UK Enters ‘Golden Age of Nuclear’
While I welcome the announcement of this project, I note that the original budget cost for Hinkley Point C was £18 billion and this has constantly...