Seeing red on green taxes
Government needs to back emission-reducing technology not pile taxes with a green label on aviation, says Giovanni Bisignani

Airlines are in crisis. In five years fuel has gone from 14 per cent of operating costs to more than 34 per cent. If oil prices average $135 for the rest of the year, the industry bill will be $190bn (£99m). And next year it could be more than $250bn. There is no alternative to kerosene. Saving fuel not only reduces CO
emissions — it is a matter of survival.
IATA's environment leadership is delivering results after working with our members to implement best practice in fuel management. In 2007 this saved 6.7 million tonnes of CO
and $1.3bn. Our work with governments and air navigation service providers meant optimising 395 routes and procedures in 81 airports, saving 3.8 million tonnes of CO
and $831m in costs. With better air traffic management, up to 73 million tonnes of CO
could be saved but while painting themselves green to win votes governments are slow to deliver results.
Register now to continue reading
Thanks for visiting The Engineer. You’ve now reached your monthly limit of premium content. Register for free to unlock unlimited access to all of our premium content, as well as the latest technology news, industry opinion and special reports.
Benefits of registering
-
In-depth insights and coverage of key emerging trends
-
Unrestricted access to special reports throughout the year
-
Daily technology news delivered straight to your inbox
Construction industry lags in tech adoption
Are these the best people to ask "Insights from 2,000 Industry Leaders"? - what would their customers views be like (perhaps more...