Wasted words?

The question of how the UK will dispose of its nuclear waste has been brought into the spotlight onceagain after a top adviser resigned from the body set up to find a solution. Helen Knight reports.

The Government has long faced criticism for stalling on the issue of the UK’s nuclear waste stockpile.

Nuclear energy is not a popular subject among voters at the best of times, so proposing to store highly radioactive material 300m or so below ground near their homes will be a hard sell.

If the UK had vast tracts of unpopulated land with the right geology for a deep storage facility people might be willing to take a back seat and allow engineers and scientists to make the decisions. But as one of the most population-dense countries in Europe, this is not likely to happen.

So how can government and industry get the right balance between consulting the public and making the right choice technically on something that will need to be stored safely underground for the next 100,000 years?

The issue is under the spotlight again following the resignation of Prof David Ball from the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM), the body set up to advise the government on the best option for disposing of the UK’s radioactive waste.

Register now to continue reading

Thanks for visiting The Engineer. You’ve now reached your monthly limit of premium content. Register for free to unlock unlimited access to all of our premium content, as well as the latest technology news, industry opinion and special reports. 

Benefits of registering

  • In-depth insights and coverage of key emerging trends

  • Unrestricted access to special reports throughout the year

  • Daily technology news delivered straight to your inbox