Last week's poll: Arctic hydrocarbons
Shell’s decision to stop its exploration efforts in Alaskan waters draws an expensive eight-year programme to a close. Which statement is closest to your feelings on extracting hydrocarbons from the Arctic?

THe resaonse to last week’s poll was relatively restrained, with 34 readers responding: somewhat down on previous polls. But the split of opinion was very interesting. No option received a majority of votes, but two dominated with very similar proportions of respondents: 45 per cent ascribed to what might be called a pure economics view, stating that despite the difficulties of extracting oil from the Arctic, industry will revive its efforts if the oil price rises high enough. Meanwhile 42 per cent went for an environmental viewpoint, choosing the option that the Arctic is such a sensitive and important habitat that it needs special protection against hydrocarbon extraction. In the smaller options, 5 percent thought the sheer difficulty amd expense of extraction was protection enough; 4 per cent thought oil extraction should continue in all environments and oil companies can be trusted to limit environmetal impact, and another 4 per cent declined to pick an option.
Register now to continue reading
Thanks for visiting The Engineer. You’ve now reached your monthly limit of news stories. Register for free to unlock unlimited access to all of our news coverage, as well as premium content including opinion, in-depth features and special reports.
Benefits of registering
-
In-depth insights and coverage of key emerging trends
-
Unrestricted access to special reports throughout the year
-
Daily technology news delivered straight to your inbox
UK not prepared for climate impacts, says CCC
Perhaps a Longtitude prize to solve railway line problems. "extreme heat causing further disruption through rail buckling and power line...