Solutions you CAM afford

Just like their PLM counterparts, CAM vendors are beginning to focus on improving the process, as well as making it more affordable. Charles Clarke says now is the time to buy.

The mid-range modelling market was defined in 1995 by the introduction of SolidWorks, closely followed by Solid Edge and Inventor and a small handful of other modelling codes.

The critical characteristic of these developments was a major price drop in feature-based MCAD applications coupled with Windows ease of use. The initial idea was to offer about 80 per cent of the functionality of the higher-cost MCAD systems, such as Pro/ENGINEER, UG and CATIA, for about 20 per cent of the price.

The other key characteristic was the so-called ‘add-on’ applications — or partner products — enabled by the modeller’s API and Windows ‘plug and play’. These applications gave mid-range users integrated multi application CAx systems for the first time, for a fraction of the cost of the then current integrated (high-end) systems.

At the same time there was the beginnings of an ‘affordable’ CAM market, with independent vendors such as Pathtrace, Vero and Licom offering alternative Windows-based solutions to the high end offerings of PTC, UG and IBM/Dassault. These alternatives were brought into sharp focus and given extra impetus by the mid-range modelling market of the mid 1990s.

Register now to continue reading

Thanks for visiting The Engineer. You’ve now reached your monthly limit of news stories. Register for free to unlock unlimited access to all of our news coverage, as well as premium content including opinion, in-depth features and special reports.  

Benefits of registering

  • In-depth insights and coverage of key emerging trends

  • Unrestricted access to special reports throughout the year

  • Daily technology news delivered straight to your inbox