UK car output falls for eight consecutive month

October saw the eight consecutive decline in manufacturing output for Britain’s car manufacturers, according to figures published today (November 28, 2024) by the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.

In the year to date, UK car production has dropped 10.8 per cent to 670,346 units
In the year to date, UK car production has dropped 10.8 per cent to 670,346 units - AdobeStock

In total, 77,484 units left factories, 14,037 fewer than in the same month last year, with plants continuing their retooling for the production of zero emission vehicles.

24,719 battery electric, plug-in hybrid and hybrid electric cars were made, representing 31.9 per cent of output, despite a volume decline of 32.6 per cent. Since January, UK car makers have produced 239,773 electrified vehicles, with 71.8 per cent of them exported.

Volumes for domestic and export markets declined in October, down 4.7 per cent and 17.6 per cent respectively, with eight-in-10 cars exported and over half of these (32,170 units) heading into the EU, although total volumes fell by 34.6 per cent. The UK’s luxury and premium models accounted for a 96.2 per cent surge in exports to the US. .

In the year to date, UK car production has dropped 10.8 per cent to 670,346 units, which SMMT attributes to falling exports. While production for the UK is up 5.3 per cent to 159,125 units, exports are down 14.8 per cent to 511,221 units, equivalent to 89,095 fewer cars being shipped overseas in the first ten months.

SMMT’s latest figures follow announcements by manufacturers and suppliers in the UK and Europe that reflect challenging market conditions and a slowdown in the transition to electrification. 

In a statement, Mike Hawes, SMMT chief executive, said: “These are deeply concerning times for the automotive industry, with massive investments in plants and new zero emission products under intense pressure. Slowdowns in the global market – especially for EVs – are impacting production output, with the situation in the UK particularly acute given we have arguably the toughest targets and most accelerated timeline but without the consumer incentives necessary to drive demand.

“The cost of stimulating that demand and complying with those targets is huge and, as we are seeing, unsustainable. Urgent action is therefore needed, and we will work with government on its rapid review of the regulation and the development of an ambitious and comprehensive Industrial Strategy to assure our competitiveness.”

SMMT warned yesterday (November 27, 2024) that auto makers are struggling to fulfil the 22 per cent EV sales target set by the zero emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate, which is predicted to cost Britain’s automotive industry £6bn this year. On the same day, Stellantis announced the proposed closure of its Luton van making plant, stating the decision was ‘made within the context of the UK’s ZEV Mandate’.

Commenting, Johnathan Dudley, head of Manufacturing at Crowe UK, said: “Output is clearly linked to falling demand and there is little doubt the current economic outlook and mounting job uncertainty is affecting this situation. It's further frustrated by the effects of EV quota penalties which are now "under review", but this could be too late for the Luton van plant.

“The effect on the supply chain is huge: vehicle manufacturers work on "just in time" and therefore any reduction in component orders will immediately be passed down to businesses in the supply chain. Many of these suppliers are funded using receivables finance and so any sales downturn will suck cashflow out of their business - it's highly likely intervention through government support will be needed over the coming months to prop up the supply chain.

“The government’s recent green paper on the industrial strategy sets out a roadmap for growth. However, to achieve this, supply chain security and retention of skills is vital. In a world striving for growth, the business secretary needs closely monitor market movements and be ready and willing to respond in a way that is both bold and pragmatic. Otherwise, people's livelihoods, and the success of the industrial strategy, could be on the line.”