The history of fibre-reinforced composite product development has shown an evolution from the classical laminate analysis approach through to modern techniques. This paper shows how finite elements can be used to create composite structures which perform better and provide enhanced safety in critical applications.
The paper shows how a structure can be made more robust by the analysis of failure through to ultimate load. Understanding how this failure occurs allows us to make a better assessment of the structures performance in extreme load conditions.
Failure prediction methods such as progressive failure analysis (PFA), virtual crack closure (VCCT) and cohesive zone modelling (CZM) have been available for years. This paper looks at the practical use of these methods and how material behaviour influences the results. It also looks at what material testing can be needed to make these new techniques more accurate.
These methods are illustrated with examples such as a plate with a hole. In this example we can change the behaviour of progressive failure by modifying FE solver settings for the way that the material degrades. Understanding this is important to ensure that we get better analysis results.
Practical comparison of analysis with theory and test of some typical L-sections from an aircraft structure is given. Of particular interest is the ability of structures to survive beyond initial failure. This can be due to loads being re-distributed due to the failure and also due to material non-linearity in certain failure modes. Using this practical example we can see how composite failure can involve a combination of different failures including resin cracking, delamination, buckling and fibre failure. A complete finite element solution needs to be capable of including all of these effects.
The conclusion suggests some questions which the analyst can ask of a design to ensure that it is safe, robust and damage tolerant.
April 1886: the Brunkebergs tunnel
First ever example of a ground source heat pump?